IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.00998.html

Portfolio Choice under General Utility with Transaction Costs and Search Frictions

Author

Listed:
  • Tae Ung Gang
  • Donghan Kim

Abstract

We study finite-horizon portfolio optimization with proportional transaction costs and trading opportunities arriving at the jump times of a Cox process. Borrowing and short-selling are prohibited, while utility functions need not be concave, increasing, or differentiable. The admissible class includes differentiable utilities with asymptotic elasticity greater than or equal to one. The associated Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman equation is semi-linear and nonlocal, with control entering only through a zeroth-order term. We show that the normalized equation admits a unique bounded solution that is continuous in all state variables and classical in time and log-price. The proof combines a contraction argument with interior Schauder estimates, and verification identifies the value function and yields an optimal Markovian feedback strategy. Numerical examples with non-concave utilities exhibit, at fixed time and pre-trade wealth, multiple intervals associated with the same trading action, departures from the usual buy--no-trade--sell ordering, and abrupt switches in the optimal post-trade risky weight.

Suggested Citation

  • Tae Ung Gang & Donghan Kim, 2026. "Portfolio Choice under General Utility with Transaction Costs and Search Frictions," Papers 2610.00998, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.00998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.00998
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandra Cretarola & Fausto Gozzi & Huyên Pham & Peter Tankov, 2011. "Optimal consumption policies in illiquid markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 85-115, January.
    2. Peter Diesinger & Holger Kraft & Frank Seifried, 2010. "Asset allocation and liquidity breakdowns: what if your broker does not answer the phone?," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 343-374, September.
    3. Agostino Capponi & Yuchong Zhang, 2024. "A Continuous Time Framework for Sequential Goal-Based Wealth Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7664-7691, November.
    4. Milton Friedman & L. J. Savage, 1948. "The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 279-279.
    5. Enrico Diecidue & Jeroen van de Ven, 2008. "Aspiration Level, Probability Of Success And Failure, And Expected Utility," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 49(2), pages 683-700, May.
    6. Koichi Matsumoto, 2006. "Optimal portfolio of low liquid assets with a log-utility function," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 121-145, January.
    7. Shefrin, Hersh & Statman, Meir, 2000. "Behavioral Portfolio Theory," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 127-151, June.
    8. Merton, Robert C., 1971. "Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 373-413, December.
    9. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Hanqing Jin & Xun Yu Zhou, 2008. "Behavioral Portfolio Selection In Continuous Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 385-426, July.
    11. Enrico Diecidue & Jeroen Van De Ven, 2008. "Aspiration Level, Probability Of Success And Failure, And Expected Utility," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 49(2), pages 683-700, May.
    12. Huyên Pham & Peter Tankov, 2008. "A Model Of Optimal Consumption Under Liquidity Risk With Random Trading Times," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 613-627, October.
    13. Karel Janeček & Steven Shreve, 2004. "Asymptotic analysis for optimal investment and consumption with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 181-206, May.
    14. M. H. A. Davis & A. R. Norman, 1990. "Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 676-713, November.
    15. Stefan Gerhold & Paolo Guasoni & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Walter Schachermayer, 2014. "Transaction costs, trading volume, and the liquidity premium," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, January.
    16. Andrew Ang & Dimitris Papanikolaou & Mark M. Westerfield, 2014. "Portfolio Choice with Illiquid Assets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2737-2761, November.
    17. Paul Gassiat & Huyên Pham & Mihai Sîrbu, 2011. "Optimal Investment On Finite Horizon With Random Discrete Order Flow In Illiquid Markets," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 17-40.
    18. L.C.G. Rogers, 2001. "The relaxed investor and parameter uncertainty," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 131-154.
    19. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "The Utility of Wealth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(2), pages 151-151.
    20. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    21. Min Dai & Steven Kou & Shuaijie Qian & Xiangwei Wan, 2022. "Nonconcave Utility Maximization with Portfolio Bounds," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8368-8385, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Hyuk Choi & Tae Ung Gang, 2021. "Optimal investment in illiquid market with search frictions and transaction costs," Papers 2101.09936, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    2. Tae Ung Gang & Jin Hyuk Choi, 2024. "Unified Asymptotics For Investment Under Illiquidity: Transaction Costs And Search Frictions," Papers 2407.13547, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    3. Shuaijie Qian & Chen Yang, 2023. "Non-Concave Utility Maximization with Transaction Costs," Papers 2307.02178, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    4. Michael Ludkovski & Hyekyung Min, 2010. "Illiquidity Effects in Optimal Consumption-Investment Problems," Papers 1004.1489, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2010.
    5. Bi, Xiuchun & Cui, Zhenyu & Fan, Jiacheng & Yuan, Lvning & Zhang, Shuguang, 2023. "Optimal investment problem under behavioral setting: A Lagrange duality perspective," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Soren Christensen & Marc Wittlinger, 2012. "Optimal relaxed portfolio strategies for growth rate maximization problems with transaction costs," Papers 1209.0305, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    7. Mark Broadie & Weiwei Shen, 2016. "High-Dimensional Portfolio Optimization With Transaction Costs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(04), pages 1-49, June.
    8. L. Rüschendorf & Steven Vanduffel, 2020. "On the construction of optimal payoffs," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(1), pages 129-153, June.
    9. Aristidou, Andreas & Giga, Aleksandar & Lee, Suk & Zapatero, Fernando, 2025. "Aspirational utility and investment behavior," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    10. Li, Shuang & Meng, Hui & Zhou, Ming, 2025. "Optimal consumption-leisure-investment and retirement choices with nonconcave aspirational utility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Sudeep Bhatia & Graham Loomes & Daniel Read, 2021. "Establishing the laws of preferential choice behavior," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(6), pages 1324-1369, November.
    12. Wang, Ning & Siu, Tak Kuen, 2024. "Investment–consumption optimization with transaction cost and learning about return predictability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 877-891.
    13. Jing Peng & Pengyu Wei & Zuo Quan Xu, 2022. "Relative growth rate optimization under behavioral criterion," Papers 2211.05402, arXiv.org.
    14. Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2013. "The General Structure of Optimal Investment and Consumption with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1303.3148, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    15. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Michel Kschonnek & Rudi Zagst, 2022. "Portfolio optimization: not necessarily concave utility and constraints on wealth and allocation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(1), pages 101-140, February.
    16. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    17. Xinfu Chen & Min Dai & Wei Jiang & Cong Qin, 2022. "Asymptotic analysis of long‐term investment with two illiquid and correlated assets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1133-1169, October.
    18. Junkee Jeon & Takwon Kim & Jinwan Park & A. Max Reppen, 2026. "Finite-Horizon Reversible Investment under Multi-Factor Dynamics," Papers 2609.36405, arXiv.org.
    19. Baojun Bian & Xinfu Chen & Min Dai & Shuaijie Qian, 2021. "Penalty method for portfolio selection with capital gains tax," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1013-1055, July.
    20. Dai, Min & Wang, Hefei & Yang, Zhou, 2012. "Leverage management in a bull–bear switching market," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1585-1599.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.00998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.