IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.15796.html

Penalized Maximum Likelihood Inference of Core-Periphery Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Mosca
  • Piero Mazzarisi

Abstract

Likelihood-based network models are often fitted under links' independence and low-order constraints, while empirical networks frequently exhibit systematic higher-order structures such as triangles and wedges, characterizing the observed clustering patterns. Real-world core-periphery networks such as the interbank market or the air transportation system represent key examples, with cores displaying complex and nonlinear features. We formalize Penalized Likelihood with Structural Discrepancies (PLSD) as an inference-level correction that trades likelihood fit for agreement with targeted motifs. PLSD augments the negative log-likelihood with a penalty on standardized wedge and triangle discrepancies, yielding a controlled distortion of the likelihood surface that can be interpreted through a linear response analysis. A calibration approach for the unique tuning hyperparameter is introduced to turn off the penalization term when the model is correctly specified, thereby recovering maximum-likelihood estimation in that case. We then introduce a mixed-constraint maximum-entropy core-periphery Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM), derive unconditional semi-closed motif formulas under Pareto-distributed core fitness, and interpret sparse-regime scaling through a big-jump mechanism for heavy-tailed distributions. We finally corroborate the PLSD inference methodology both with Monte Carlo simulations of a toy stochastic block model and by applying the novel core-periphery ERGM to weekly eMID interbank networks (2009-2015) and monthly US air traffic networks (1991-2000). We show that PLSD describes cores that are not only dense but also higher-order-rich and captures the observed heterogeneous degree distributions and the overexpression of wedges and triangles, at a link-level cost proportional to the model misspecification.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Mosca & Piero Mazzarisi, 2026. "Penalized Maximum Likelihood Inference of Core-Periphery Networks," Papers 2609.15796, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.15796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.15796
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Lars Peter, 1982. "Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 1029-1054, July.
    2. Bagler, Ganesh, 2008. "Analysis of the airport network of India as a complex weighted network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(12), pages 2972-2980.
    3. Xu, Tao & He, Jianmin & Li, Shouwei, 2016. "A dynamic network model for interbank market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 463(C), pages 131-138.
    4. Craig, Ben & von Peter, Goetz, 2014. "Interbank tiering and money center banks," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 322-347.
    5. Paolo Barucca & Fabrizio Lillo, 2018. "The organization of the interbank network and how ECB unconventional measures affected the e-MID overnight market," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 33-53, January.
    6. Tiziano Squartini & Iman van Lelyveld & Diego Garlaschelli, 2013. "Early-warning signals of topological collapse in interbank networks," Papers 1302.2063, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2013.
    7. Barucca, Paolo & Lillo, Fabrizio, 2016. "Disentangling bipartite and core-periphery structure in financial networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 244-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marnix Van Soom & Milan van den Heuvel & Jan Ryckebusch & Koen Schoors, 2019. "Loan maturity aggregation in interbank lending networks obscures mesoscale structure and economic functions," Papers 1906.08617, arXiv.org.
    2. Macchiati, Valentina & Mazzarisi, Piero & Garlaschelli, Diego, 2024. "Interbank network reconstruction enforcing density and reciprocity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Sadamori Kojaku & Giulio Cimini & Guido Caldarelli & Naoki Masuda, 2018. "Structural changes in the interbank market across the financial crisis from multiple core-periphery analysis," Papers 1802.05139, arXiv.org.
    4. Valentina Macchiati & Piero Mazzarisi & Diego Garlaschelli, 2024. "Interbank network reconstruction enforcing density and reciprocity," Papers 2402.11136, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    5. Kobayashi, Teruyoshi & Takaguchi, Taro, 2018. "Identifying relationship lending in the interbank market: A network approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 20-36.
    6. Tiziano Squartini & Guido Caldarelli & Giulio Cimini & Andrea Gabrielli & Diego Garlaschelli, 2018. "Reconstruction methods for networks: the case of economic and financial systems," Papers 1806.06941, arXiv.org.
    7. León, Carlos & Miguélez, Javier, 2021. "Interbank relationship lending: A network perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    8. Alessandro Ferracci & Giulio Cimini, 2021. "Systemic risk in interbank networks: disentangling balance sheets and network effects," Papers 2109.14360, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
    9. Carlos León & Javier Miguélez, 2020. "Interbank relationship lending in Colombia," Borradores de Economia 1118, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    10. Fabio Caccioli & Paolo Barucca & Teruyoshi Kobayashi, 2018. "Network models of financial systemic risk: a review," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 81-114, January.
    11. Thorben Funke & Till Becker, 2019. "Stochastic block models: A comparison of variants and inference methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-40, April.
    12. Anastasios Demertzidis, 2019. "Interbank transactions on the intraday frequency: -Different market states and the effects of the financial crisis-," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201932, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    13. L. Bargigli & G. di Iasio & L. Infante & F. Lillo & F. Pierobon, 2015. "The multiplex structure of interbank networks," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 673-691, April.
    14. Caceres-Santos, Jonnathan & Rodriguez-Martinez, Anahi & Caccioli, Fabio & Martinez-Jaramillo, Serafin, 2020. "Systemic risk and other interdependencies among banks in Bolivia," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    15. Morteza Alaeddini & Philippe Madiès & Paul J. Reaidy & Julie Dugdale, 2023. "Interbank money market concerns and actors’ strategies—A systematic review of 21st century literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 573-654, April.
    16. Iori, Giulia & Mantegna, Rosario N. & Marotta, Luca & Miccichè, Salvatore & Porter, James & Tumminello, Michele, 2015. "Networked relationships in the e-MID interbank market: A trading model with memory," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 98-116.
    17. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Alexandre, Michel da Silva & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda, 2018. "Bank lending and systemic risk: A financial-real sector network approach with feedback," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 98-118.
    18. Yan, Chun & Ding, Yi & Liu, Wei & Liu, Xinhong & Liu, Jiahui, 2023. "Multilayer interbank networks and systemic risk propagation: Evidence from China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 628(C).
    19. Andre R. Neveu, 2018. "A survey of network-based analysis and systemic risk measurement," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 13(2), pages 241-281, July.
    20. Linardi, Fernando & Diks, Cees & van der Leij, Marco & Lazier, Iuri, 2020. "Dynamic interbank network analysis using latent space models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.15796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.