IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.09488.html

Two Margins in Difference-in-Differences with a Continuous Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Fangzhou Yu

Abstract

This paper studies difference-in-differences with staggered adoption and a continuous, time-invariant dose. Each cohort-time comparison contains two margins. The level margin is the average treatment effect at realized doses. Under level parallel trends it equals the level contrast between the treated cohort and not-yet-treated controls. The response margin is the within-cohort slope of the outcome change on dose. It uses no controls, and its causal interpretation requires a response parallel trends assumption and a restriction on selection on gains. We show that the continuous-dose OLS coefficient in each cohort-time comparison is a convex combination of the response index and the level contrast per unit of mean dose, with a mixing weight that depends on the not-yet-treated share. We provide estimators of both margins, joint inference across cohort-time comparisons and event-time aggregates, and a covariate-adjusted extension. In an application to hydraulic fracturing, the level leads reject a joint zero restriction, whereas the response-index leads do not. The continuous-dose OLS coefficient draws primarily on the level margin. We report the level and response margin separately.

Suggested Citation

  • Fangzhou Yu, 2026. "Two Margins in Difference-in-Differences with a Continuous Treatment," Papers 2609.09488, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.09488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.09488
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashesh Rambachan & Jonathan Roth, 2023. "A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(5), pages 2555-2591.
    2. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2026. "Estimating Causal Effects With Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 356-382, June.
    2. Sun, Yucheng & Li, Jiaolong & Shen, Xiuheng & Pan, Zhewen, 2025. "Early-life access to primary healthcare and educational attainment: Evidence from community health centers in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 380(C).
    3. Cocco, Valentin & Chakir, Raja & Mouysset, Lauriane, 2025. "Guilty or scapegoat? Land consolidation and hedgerow decline," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Wang, Yimin, 2025. "Links between COVID-19 lockdowns and drug overdose deaths, evidence from panel data," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Kaleb Abreha & Raymond Robertson, 2025. "Revisiting the Effects of Regional Trade Agreements Using Staggered Adoption Design," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 53(3), pages 113-124, September.
    6. Craig S Wright, 2026. "Design-Robust Event-Study Estimation under Staggered Adoption Diagnostics, Sensitivity, and Orthogonalisation," Papers 2601.18801, arXiv.org.
    7. Ben Deaner & Chen-Wei Hsiang & Andrei Zeleneev, 2025. "Simple Specification-Free Causal Inference in Large Panels," Papers 2503.20769, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
    8. Robert Reinhardt, 2024. "Shaking up Foreign Finance: FDI in a Post-Disaster World," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 317-348, July.
    9. Li, Daiyue & Jin, Yanhong & Cheng, Mingwang, 2024. "Unleashing the power of industrial robotics on firm productivity: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 500-520.
    10. Lee, Sunyoung, 2025. "Did recreational marijuana legalization increase crime in the long run?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Burton, Anne M. & Churchill, Brandyn F., 2025. "Supply-side opioid restrictions and the retail pharmacy market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    12. Rottner, Elisa, 2023. "Do climate policies lead to outsourcing? Evidence from firm-level imports," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-070, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Alice Bonaimé & Ye (Emma) Wang, 2024. "Mergers, Product Prices, and Innovation: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(3), pages 2195-2236, June.
    14. Jader Velásquez & Shon Ferguson, 2026. "From Meat to Plant‐Based Products? The Enduring Impact of BSE on Beef Consumption," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 57(4), July.
    15. Ohyun Kwon & Hao Zhao & Min Qiang Zhao, 2025. "The reallocation effect of emissions cap‐and‐trade: Evidence from China," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 1311-1337, November.
    16. Philipp Barteska & Jay Euijung Lee, 2024. "Bureaucrats and the Korean export miracle," Discussion Papers 2024-11, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).
    17. Anna Laura Baraldi & Claudia Cantabene & Alessandro De Iudicibus & Giovanni Fosco & Erasmo Papagni, 2025. "Shocks and Selection: How Earthquakes Shape Local Political Representation," EERI Research Paper Series EERI RP 2025/06, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    18. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Giulio Fusco & Mario Intini & Gianluca Monturano, 2026. "Digital divide and income inequality: causal evidence from Italian provinces," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 75(1), pages 1-45, March.
    19. Xiaohui Guo & Lizhong Peng & Xuezhu Shi, 2026. "The Impact of Unemployment Insurance Benefit Cuts on Mental Health: Evidence From Early Pandemic Program Expirations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(9), pages 1382-1396, September.
    20. Isabelle Chort & Berk Öktem, 2024. "Agricultural shocks, coping policies and deforestation: Evidence from the coffee leaf rust epidemic in Mexico," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1020-1057, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.09488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.