IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.09944.html

GAGI: A Gini-Adjusted GDP-per-Capita Index for Distribution-Aware Macroeconomic Welfare Monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Sivasathivel Kandasamy

Abstract

GDP per capita is the default lens through which governibng bodies track the economic prosperity and consequences of economic events , yet it is blind to two first-order determinants of lived prosperity: income/wealth distribution and inflation impact. Inequality-adjusted income measures are themselves not new but What is missing from the macroeconomic monitoring toolkit specifically is not a welfare concept but an operational monitoring trigger: a statistic minimal enough to compute annually from public data, transparent enough to audit without modelling assumptions, and normalised so that year-on-year, cross-country change ? the quantity a regulator needs to act on? is legible. We assemble such an instrument, the Gini- Adjusted GDP per Capita Index (GAGI): a reproducible, publicly computable formulation that rescales each country's GDP per capita by its inequality-adjustment factor (1-G) and its price level, normalised to a 2010 baseline. GAGI is a general-purpose welfare index, not inherently specific to AI automation, applicable wherever welfare-adjusted prosperity needs tracking. Applying GAGI to the G7 economies over 2010-2026, we show that welfare-adjusted prosperity has diverged persistently and increasingly from headline GDP growth, that the divergence widens sharply after 2022, temporally coincident with, though not, on this evidence alone, demonstrated to be caused by the after effects of COVID and the acceleration of generative-AI deployment. We argue that GAGI is a necessary complement to GDP-based monitoring: any macroeconomic monitoring instrument that tracks only aggregate output will systematically miss the distributional harm that automation can cause even while reported growth remains strong.

Suggested Citation

  • Sivasathivel Kandasamy, 2026. "GAGI: A Gini-Adjusted GDP-per-Capita Index for Distribution-Aware Macroeconomic Welfare Monitoring," Papers 2606.09944, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.09944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.09944
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    2. Daron Acemoglu, 2025. "The simple macroeconomics of AI," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 40(121), pages 13-58.
    3. Loukas Karabarbounis, 2024. "Perspectives on the Labor Share," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 38(2), pages 107-136, Spring.
    4. Brent Neiman, 2014. "The Global Decline of the Labor Share," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(1), pages 61-103.
    5. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1279-1333.
    6. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue nov.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaime Arellano-Bover & Carolina Bussotti & Matteo Paradisi & Liangjie Wu, 2026. "The Labor Demand Implications of Brand Capital: Evidence from Trademark Transactions," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26079, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    2. David Autor & Caroline Chin & Anna M. Salomons & Bryan Seegmiller, 2026. "What Makes New Work Different from More Work?," NBER Working Papers 34986, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Kudoh, Noritaka & Miyamoto, Hiroaki, 2025. "Robots, AI, and unemployment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. David Kunst, 2019. "Deskilling among Manufacturing Production Workers," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-050/VI, Tinbergen Institute, revised 30 Dec 2020.
    5. Lee Ohanian & Musa Orak & Shihan Shen, 2023. "Revisiting Capital-Skill Complementarity, Inequality, and Labor Share," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 479-505, December.
    6. Lingdi Zhao & Shuo Zhang, 2025. "Employment Effects of Technological Progress in U.S. Healthcare: Evidence from Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Qiao, Xiaole & He, Yang & Du, Qiang, 2025. "How does the urban digital economy drive labor allocation in China?—A perspective of factor mobility between digital and non-digital enterprises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1159-1175.
    8. Shi, Huaizhi, 2024. "Managerial ownership and labor income share," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    9. Georgios A. Tritsaris, 2025. "Occupational Tasks, Automation, and Economic Growth: A Modeling and Simulation Approach," Papers 2512.16261, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    10. Florent Bordot & Andre Lorentz, 2021. "Automation and labor market polarization in an evolutionary model with heterogeneous workers," LEM Papers Series 2021/32, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Scavino Alfaro, Vicenzo, 2025. "Automation, market power, and the citizen dividend: a DSGE-HANK with antitrust and a citizen sovereign wealth fund," MPRA Paper 127515, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Xue, Kunkun & Cui, Ziyi & Sun, Zepeng & Sun, Peipei, 2026. "Does digital technology increase the labor income share of enterprises?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Ajay K. Agrawal & John McHale & Alexander Oettl, 2026. "AI in Science," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Science: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Izabela Sobiech Pellegrini & Rafał Chmura & Jakub Sawulski & Tymoteusz Mętrak, 2025. "Can the improvements in human capital quality mitigate the negative impact of ageing on growth? Evidence from selected EU countries," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 253-274, April.
    15. Auyon Siddiq & Niuniu Zhang, 2026. "Human Capital, AI, and Labor Commoditization," Papers 2606.21880, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    16. Xiliu He & Haoxiang Zhao & Mingyi Ma & Edward Wen Chuan Lai & Koei Enomoto & Anni Hu & Jiatong Li & Lingyun Chu & Yuan Lai, 2026. "Generative AI impacts on intra-urban inequality and skill premium in Beijing," Papers 2605.25505, arXiv.org.
    17. Vahagn Jerbashian, 2026. "On the elasticity of substitution between labor and ICT and IP capital and traditional capital," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 60, April.
    18. Meng, Ting & Yang, Yuqi & Xie, E. & Xie, Yuxiang, 2025. "The dual effects of digitization: An enterprise perspective," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Vardanyan, David, 2024. "Technologies and Labour : A Theoretical Model of Task-based Production in Labour Market with Search Frictions," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 79, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.
    20. Anderton, Robert & Jarvis, Valerie & Labhard, Vincent & Morgan, Julian & Petroulakis, Filippos & Vivian, Lara, 2020. "Virtually everywhere? Digitalisation and the euro area and EU economies," Occasional Paper Series 244, European Central Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.09944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.