IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.20609.html

Strategy-proof Market Segmentation against Price Discrimination

Author

Listed:
  • Zhonghong Kuang
  • Sanxi Li
  • Yi Liu
  • Yang Yu

Abstract

Data regulations increasingly enable consumers to switch among market segments, making segmentation an endogenous outcome of strategic interaction. We study a model in which consumers choose segments before a monopolist sets segment-specific prices, and define a segmentation as strategy-proof when no consumer with positive measure can profitably deviate. Our main result provides a complete welfare characterization: in every strategy-proof segmentation, producer surplus is pinned at the uniform monopoly profit, consumer surplus ranges from the uniform monopoly level to the buyer-optimal level, and every consumer is weakly better off. We construct strategy-proof segmentations attaining every feasible outcome in this range. A finite-consumer model microfounds our solution concept, with equilibrium outcomes converging to our characterization as the population grows large.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhonghong Kuang & Sanxi Li & Yi Liu & Yang Yu, 2026. "Strategy-proof Market Segmentation against Price Discrimination," Papers 2603.20609, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.20609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20609
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gehrig, Thomas & Stenbacka, Rune, 2007. "Information sharing and lending market competition with switching costs and poaching," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 77-99, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costello, Anna M. & Down, Andrea K. & Mehta, Mihir N., 2020. "Machine + man: A field experiment on the role of discretion in augmenting AI-based lending models," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    2. Wolfgang Pointner & Burkhard Raunig, 2018. "A primer on peer-to-peer lending: immediate financial intermediation in practice," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/18, pages 36-51.
    3. Marcela Eslava & Xavier Freixas, 2021. "Public Development Banks and Credit Market Imperfections," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 53(5), pages 1121-1149, August.
    4. Baah Aye Kusi & Elikplimi Komla Agbloyor & Vera Ogeh Fiador & Kofi Achampong Osei, 2016. "Does Information Sharing Promote or Detract from Bank Returns: Evidence from Ghana," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 28(3), pages 332-343, September.
    5. Bruno Carballa Smichowski & Yassine Lefouili & Andrea Mantovani & Carlo Reggiani, 2025. "Data Sharing or Analytics Sharing ?," Working Papers hal-04956937, HAL.
    6. Ahn, Jung-Hyun & Breton, Régis, 2014. "Securitization, competition and monitoring," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 195-210.
    7. repec:bof:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201603021033 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Simon C. Parker, 2024. "Democracy, corruption, and endogenous entrepreneurship policy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 361-376, March.
    9. Laptieva, Nataliia, 2016. "Information sharing and the volume of private credit in transition: Evidence from Ukrainian bank-level panel dataAuthor-Name: Grajzl, Peter," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 434-449.
    10. Ghosh, Saibal, 2019. "Loan delinquency in banking systems: How effective are credit reporting systems?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 220-236.
    11. Koffi Elitcha, 2021. "The moderating role of stock markets in the bank competition-entrepreneurship relationship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1333-1360, April.
    12. Cheng, X. & Degryse, H.A., 2010. "Information Sharing and Credit Rationing : Evidence from the Introduction of a Public Credit Registry," Discussion Paper 2010-34S, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Brown, Martin & Zehnder, Christian, 2010. "The emergence of information sharing in credit markets," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 255-278, April.
    14. De Nijs, Romain, 2017. "Behavior-based price discrimination and customer information sharing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 319-334.
    15. Boyd, John & Hakenes, Hendrik & Heitz, Amanda, 2018. "The Effects of Creditor Rights and Bank Information Sharing on Borrower Behavior: Theory and Evidence," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181565, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Ronen Gradwohl & Moshe Tennenholtz, 2023. "Selling Data to a Competitor (Extended Abstract)," Papers 2307.05078, arXiv.org.
    17. de Janvry, Alain & McIntosh, Craig & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2010. "The supply- and demand-side impacts of credit market information," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 173-188, November.
    18. Karapetyan, Artashes & Stacescu, Bogdan, 2014. "Does information sharing reduce the role of collateral as a screening device?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 48-57.
    19. EL Fakir, Adil & Fairchild, Richard & Tkiouat, Mohamed, 2019. "A hybrid profit and loss sharing model using interest free-debt and equity financing: An application of game theory as a decision tool," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 352-360.
    20. Brown, Martin & Jappelli, Tullio & Pagano, Marco, 2009. "Information sharing and credit: Firm-level evidence from transition countries," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 151-172, April.
    21. Li, Shaofang & Marinč, Matej, 2018. "Economies of scale and scope in financial market infrastructures," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-49.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.20609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.