IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.15511.html

Some general results on risk budgeting portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Fassino
  • Pierpaolo Uberti

Abstract

Given a reference risk measure, the risk budgeting is the portfolio where each asset contributes a predetermined amount to the total risk. We propose a novel approach, alternative to the ones proposed in the literature, for the calculation of the risk budgeting portfolio. This different perspective on the problem has several interesting consequences. For the calculation of the portfolio, we define a Cauchy sequence within the simplex of R^n, whose limit corresponds to the risk budgeting portfolio. This construction allows for the straightforward implementation of an efficient algorithm, avoiding the need to solve auxiliary, equivalent optimization problems, which may be computationally challenging and hard to interpret in the decision theory context. We compare our algorithm with the standard optimization-based methods proposed in the literature. From a theoretical point of view, starting from the Cauchy sequence, we define a function for which the risk budgeting portfolio is a fixed point. Therefore, sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the fixed point can be used. The methodology is developed for general risk measures and implemented in detail in the case of standard deviation.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Fassino & Pierpaolo Uberti, 2026. "Some general results on risk budgeting portfolios," Papers 2603.15511, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.15511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.15511
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Çağın Ararat & Francesco Cesarone & Mustafa Çelebi Pınar & Jacopo Maria Ricci, 2024. "MAD risk parity portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(1), pages 899-924, May.
    2. Gelmini, Matteo & Uberti, Pierpaolo, 2024. "The equally weighted portfolio still remains a challenging benchmark," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    4. Raymond Kan & Daniel R. Smith, 2008. "The Distribution of the Sample Minimum-Variance Frontier," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(7), pages 1364-1380, July.
    5. Best, Michael J & Grauer, Robert R, 1991. "On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 315-342.
    6. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    7. Bellini, Fabio & Cesarone, Francesco & Colombo, Christian & Tardella, Fabio, 2021. "Risk parity with expectiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1149-1163.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4688 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Adil Rengim Cetingoz & Jean‐David Fermanian & Olivier Guéant, 2024. "Risk Budgeting portfolios: Existence and computation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 896-924, July.
    10. c{C}au{g}{i}n Ararat & Francesco Cesarone & Mustafa c{C}elebi P{i}nar & Jacopo Maria Ricci, 2021. "MAD Risk Parity Portfolios," Papers 2110.12282, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    11. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    12. Yuan, Ming & Zhou, Guofu, 2024. "Why Naive $ 1/N $ Diversification Is Not So Naive, and How to Beat It?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(8), pages 3601-3632, December.
    13. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Cesarone & Rosella Giacometti & Manuel L. Martino & Fabio Tardella, 2025. "A return-diversification approach to portfolio selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Maria-Laura Torrente & Pierpaolo Uberti, 2025. "The reasons why maximum diversification is better than minimum risk, including in terms of risk," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(6), pages 642-675, October.
    3. Kolm, Petter N. & Tütüncü, Reha & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2014. "60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 356-371.
    4. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M. & Yan, Shu, 2017. "Portfolio selection with mental accounts and estimation risk," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 161-186.
    5. Li, Bo & Chen, Yu, 2025. "Uncertainty-driven portfolio selection via a multi-strategy modified sparrow search algorithm approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P3).
    6. Kourtis, Apostolos & Dotsis, George & Markellos, Raphael N., 2012. "Parameter uncertainty in portfolio selection: Shrinking the inverse covariance matrix," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2522-2531.
    7. Fu, Yufen & Blazenko, George W., 2017. "Normative portfolio theory," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 240-251.
    8. Garg, Divyanee & Khan, Ahmad Zaman & Mehra, Aparna, 2026. "Enhanced indexing using cumulative prospect theory utility function with expectile risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    9. Adil Rengim Cetingoz & Jean‐David Fermanian & Olivier Guéant, 2024. "Risk Budgeting portfolios: Existence and computation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 896-924, July.
    10. Napat Rujeerapaiboon & Daniel Kuhn & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2016. "Robust Growth-Optimal Portfolios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 2090-2109, July.
    11. Cirulli, Antonello & Walker, Patrick S., 2025. "Outperforming equal weighting," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    12. Jonathan Fletcher, 2009. "Risk Reduction and Mean-Variance Analysis: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7-8), pages 951-971.
    13. Zhu, Bo & Zhang, Tianlun, 2021. "Long-term wealth growth portfolio allocation under parameter uncertainty: A non-conservative robust approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Meade, N. & Beasley, J.E. & Adcock, C.J., 2021. "Quantitative portfolio selection: Using density forecasting to find consistent portfolios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 1053-1067.
    15. Fassino, Claudia & Torrente, Maria-Laura & Uberti, Pierpaolo, 2022. "A singular value decomposition based approach to handle ill-conditioning in optimization problems with applications to portfolio theory," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    16. Harris, Richard D.F. & Stoja, Evarist & Tan, Linzhi, 2017. "The dynamic Black–Litterman approach to asset allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1085-1096.
    17. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    18. Yao, Haixiang & Huang, Jinbo & Li, Yong & Humphrey, Jacquelyn E., 2021. "A general approach to smooth and convex portfolio optimization using lower partial moments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    19. Juan F. Monge & Mercedes Landete & Jos'e L. Ruiz, 2016. "Sharpe portfolio using a cross-efficiency evaluation," Papers 1610.00937, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
    20. Imma Lory Aprea & Gianni Bosi & Gabriele Sbaiz & Salvatore Scognamiglio, 2025. "Bi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Under ESG Volatility via a MOPSO-Deep Learning Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-31, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.15511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.