IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.23402.html

An Agnostic Approach to Sustainability: From Capitals Substitutability to Non-Collapse Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Pirrone
  • Stefano Fricano
  • Gioacchino Fazio

Abstract

We construct a stochastic dynamical systems theory in which sustainability is a structural boundary property of a fully coupled Earth--Human--Production system. Each subsystem is modelled as a vector-valued process governed by stochastic differential equations with multiplicative noise and absolute bidirectional cross-subsystem flows. Biodiversity is endogenous, and societal evaluation is represented by a reflexive functional whose weights depend on evolving human capabilities. Sustainability, development, and sustainable development are defined as trajectory properties. Sustainability corresponds to boundary non-attainment with positive or unit probability; development corresponds to local ascent in the evaluation functional; sustainable development requires directional alignment under strictly positive survival probability. No optimisation problem is imposed. Necessary and sufficient conditions are derived using Feller boundary classification and stochastic Lyapunov methods. A central result identifies the sign of the net absolute cross-subsystem flow on each component as a phase-transition parameter: if negative near zero, the boundary is of exit type and almost-sure persistence is structurally impossible, independent of intrinsic regeneration, capability accumulation, or productivity parameters. Because flows are absolute, any perturbation diffuses through the entire coupled system without requiring correlated exogenous shocks. The reflexive evaluation structure generically induces non-transitive development relations, providing a formal mechanism for path-dependent welfare comparisons. Sustainability emerges as a geometric property of boundary structure and vector-field alignment, not as a corollary of intertemporal optimality.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Pirrone & Stefano Fricano & Gioacchino Fazio, 2026. "An Agnostic Approach to Sustainability: From Capitals Substitutability to Non-Collapse Dynamics," Papers 2602.23402, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.23402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.23402
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Arrow & Partha Dasgupta & Lawrence Goulder & Gretchen Daily & Paul Ehrlich & Geoffrey Heal & Simon Levin & Karl-Göran Mäler & Stephen Schneider & David Starrett & Brian Walker, 2004. "Are We Consuming Too Much?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(3), pages 147-172, Summer.
    2. Samuel Bowles, 1998. "Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 75-111, March.
    3. Pezzey, J., 1992. "Sustainable Development Concepts; An Economic Analysis," Papers 2, World Bank - The World Bank Environment Paper.
    4. John Hartwick, 1977. "Intergenerational Equity and the Investment of Rents from Exhaustible Resources in a Two Sector Model," Working Paper 281, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    5. Hartwick, John M, 1977. "Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(5), pages 972-974, December.
    6. Drupp, Moritz A. & Baumgärtner, Stefan & Meyer, Moritz & Quaas, Martin F. & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2020. "Between Ostrom and Nordhaus: The research landscape of sustainability economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eoin McLaughlin & Cristián Ducoing & Les Oxley, 2024. "Tracing Sustainability in the Long Run: Genuine Savings Estimates, 1850–2018," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring and Accounting for Environmental Public Goods: A National Accounts Perspective, pages 63-100, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Pearson, Leonie J. & Kashima, Yoshihisa & Pearson, Craig J., 2012. "Clarifying protected and utilitarian values of critical capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 206-210.
    3. Martinet, Vincent & Del Campo, Stellio & Cairns, Robert D., 2022. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue forthcomi.
    4. McLaughlin, Eoin & Moro, Mirko & de Vries, Frans P., 2025. "Competition policy, sustainability, and inclusive wealth," Accountancy, Economics, and Finance Working Papers 2025-04, Heriot-Watt University, Department of Accountancy, Economics, and Finance, revised 2025.
    5. Rintaro Yamaguchi & Masayuki Sato & Kazuhiro Ueta, 2016. "Measuring Regional Wealth and Assessing Sustainable Development: An Application to a Disaster-Torn Region in Japan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 365-389, October.
    6. Damien Bazin & Emna Omri & Nouri Chtourou, 2015. "Solar Thermal Energy for Sustainable Development in Tunisia," Post-Print halshs-01070616, HAL.
    7. Parks, Sarah & Gowdy, John, 2013. "What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Lindmark, Magnus & Acar, Sevil, 2013. "Sustainability in the making? A historical estimate of Swedish sustainable and unsustainable development 1850–2000," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 176-187.
    9. Bosi, Stefano & Camacho, Carmen & Le Van, Cuong, 2024. "A model of growth with living capital," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    10. Paul Ekins, 2014. "Strong sustainability and critical natural capital," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 4, pages 55-71, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. "Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Kovacs, Kent & Durand-Morat, Alvaro, 2020. "Lateral flows in an aquifer and groundwater valuation," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304219, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Bohringer, Christoph & Jochem, Patrick E.P., 2007. "Measuring the immeasurable -- A survey of sustainability indices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-8, June.
    14. Hepburn, Cameron & Teytelboym, Alexander & Cohen, Francois, 2018. "Is Natural Capital Really Substitutable?," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-12, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    15. Dobra, John & Dobra, Matt & Ouedraogo, Abdoulaye, 2018. "Does mineral development provide a basis for sustainable economic development?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 71-76.
    16. Natina Yaduma, 2018. "Investigating the oil curse in OECD and Non-OECD oil-exporting economies using green measures of income," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 2725-2745, December.
    17. Adrian Boos & Karin Holm‐Müller, 2012. "A theoretical overview of the relationship between the resource curse and genuine savings as an indicator for “weak” sustainability," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 36(3), pages 145-159, August.
    18. Adrian Boos, 2015. "Genuine Savings as an Indicator for “Weak” Sustainability: Critical Survey and Possible Ways forward in Practical Measuring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-37, April.
    19. Eleftheriou, Konstantinos & Nijkamp, Peter & Polemis, Michael L., 2025. "A global analysis of asymmetric sustainability effects of human and natural capital resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.23402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.