IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.11831.html

A weighted approach to identifying key team contributors: Individual productivity in professional road cycling

Author

Listed:
  • Aitor Calo-Blanco

Abstract

Assessing an individual's contribution within a team remains a fundamental challenge across many domains, particularly when recognition for collective achievements is limited to only a few members. This issue is especially important in professional road cycling, where personal success depends on both individual talent and group effort. Existing points-based ranking systems tend to disproportionately reward high-scoring team leaders while undervaluing domestiques - riders who sacrifice personal success to support group performance. To better capture a rider's impact on the team, we propose a weighted measure of cycling productivity that factors in race points, a redistribution metric, and an adapted version of the CoScore formula. This formula assesses an individual's productivity relative to their teammates' performance. Using data from the 2023 season, we show that our approach offers a comprehensive evaluation of professional cyclists, addressing key limitations of existing ranking systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Aitor Calo-Blanco, 2026. "A weighted approach to identifying key team contributors: Individual productivity in professional road cycling," Papers 2602.11831, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.11831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.11831
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bram Janssens & Matthias Bogaert & Mathijs Maton, 2023. "Predicting the next Pogačar: a data analytical approach to detect young professional cycling talents," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 557-588, June.
    2. McHale, Ian G. & Relton, Samuel D., 2018. "Identifying key players in soccer teams using network analysis and pass difficulty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 339-347.
    3. Timothy Anderson & Gunter Sharp, 1997. "A new measure of baseball batters using DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 73(0), pages 141-155, October.
    4. Rodolfo Metulini & Giorgio Gnecco, 2023. "Measuring players’ importance in basketball using the generalized Shapley value," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 441-465, June.
    5. Ausloos, Marcel, 2024. "Hierarchy selection: New team ranking indicators for cyclist multi-stage races," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 807-816.
    6. Sean Barnes & Margrét Bjarnadóttir & Daniel Smolyak & Aurélie Thiele, 2024. "A data-driven optimization approach to baseball roster management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(1), pages 33-58, April.
    7. David Van Bulck & Arthur Vande Weghe & Dries Goossens, 2023. "Result-based talent identification in road cycling: discovering the next Eddy Merckx," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 539-556, June.
    8. Dorit S. Hochbaum & Asaf Levin, 2006. "Methodologies and Algorithms for Group-Rankings Decision," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(9), pages 1394-1408, September.
    9. Karol Flores-Szwagrzak & Rafael Treibich, 2020. "Teamwork and Individual Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2523-2544, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ausloos, Marcel, 2024. "Hierarchy selection: New team ranking indicators for cyclist multi-stage races," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 807-816.
    2. Felix Fritz & Stefano Moretti & Jochen Staudacher, 2023. "Social Ranking Problems at the Interplay between Social Choice Theory and Coalitional Games," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Yeawon Yoo & Adolfo R. Escobedo, 2021. "A New Binary Programming Formulation and Social Choice Property for Kemeny Rank Aggregation," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 296-320, December.
    4. Tasnádi, Attila & Puppe, Clemens, 2025. "Violin Virtuosi: Do their Performances Fade over Time?," Corvinus Economics Working Papers (CEWP) 2025/01, Corvinus University of Budapest.
    5. Manuel Espitia-Escuer & Lucia Isabel Garcia-Cebrián, 2010. "Measurement of the efficiency of football teams in the Champions League," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 373-386.
    6. Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Kounetas Kostas & Antonakis Theodor, 2022. "Salary Cap, Organizational Gap, and Catch-up in the Performance of NBA Teams: A Two-Stage DEA Model Under Heterogeneity," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 123-155, February.
    7. Gong, Zaiwu & Guo, Weiwei & Słowiński, Roman, 2021. "Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    8. Torben Tiedemann & Tammo Francksen & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2011. "Assessing the performance of German Bundesliga football players: a non-parametric metafrontier approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(4), pages 571-587, December.
    9. Feng Li & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang, 2019. "A new data envelopment analysis based approach for fixed cost allocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 347-372, March.
    10. Roemer, Thomas A. & Ahmadi, Reza, 2010. "Models for concurrent product and process design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 601-613, June.
    11. Lang, Ningning & Wang, Lin & Zha, Quanbo, 2026. "Network game in group decision making: Managing consensus with incentive and interaction interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(3), pages 950-965.
    12. Plácido Moreno & Sebastián Lozano, 2014. "A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 214(1), pages 99-124, March.
    13. Arnab Adhikari & Adrija Majumdar & Gaurav Gupta & Arnab Bisi, 2020. "An innovative super-efficiency data envelopment analysis, semi-variance, and Shannon-entropy-based methodology for player selection: evidence from cricket," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(1), pages 1-32, January.
    14. Antonin Mac'e, 2017. "The Limits of Citation Counts," Papers 1711.02695, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    15. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2020. "Sharing the Revenues from Broadcasting Sport Events," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2417-2431, June.
    16. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2025. "Revenue Sharing at Music Streaming Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8319-8335, October.
    17. Li-Ching Ma, 2018. "Discovering Consensus Preferences Visually Based on Gower Plots," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 741-761, May.
    18. Bas J. Dietzenbacher & Aleksei Y. Kondratev, 2023. "Fair and Consistent Prize Allocation in Competitions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3319-3339, June.
    19. Josep Freixas & Roger Hoerl & William S. Zwicker, 2023. "Nash's bargaining problem and the scale-invariant Hirsch citation index," Papers 2309.01192, arXiv.org.
    20. Rahman, Shimanto & Janssens, Bram & Bogaert, Matthias, 2025. "Profit-driven pre-processing in B2B customer churn modeling using fairness techniques," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.11831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.