IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2512.18342.html

The Emergency-Care Consequences of Disrupted Prevention: Evidence from Mammography Screening Pathway

Author

Listed:
  • Moslem Rashidi
  • Luke B. Connelly
  • Gianluca Fiorentini

Abstract

Do disruptions to organized preventive-care pathways increase the likelihood of downstream overnight emergency hospitalizations? We study this question using the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment. Using SHARE Wave~9 data on women aged 50--69 in eight European countries, we instrument for mammography uptake -- an observable indicator of access to organized preventive-care pathways -- with the interaction between country-level pandemic restriction intensity and SHARE interview-month cohort. This variation is plausibly exogenous because fieldwork timing shifted the portion of the 2020 restriction period that fell within each respondent's two-year recall window, generating differential disruption to screening access across cohorts within countries. The OLS estimates are close to zero, consistent with selection based on health status. However, the IV results imply that mammography uptake reduces the probability of overnight emergency hospitalization by approximately 6 percentage points among compliers. LIML produces a statistically significant estimate of $-0.114$. Women aged 70 and above, who are outside organized screening programs in all eight countries, show no first-stage and no reduced-form evidence of an effect on overnight emergency hospitalization. A decomposition exercise confirms that the breast-cancer detection channel accounts for at most 6 percent of the estimate, pointing instead to broader preventive-pathway disruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Moslem Rashidi & Luke B. Connelly & Gianluca Fiorentini, 2025. "The Emergency-Care Consequences of Disrupted Prevention: Evidence from Mammography Screening Pathway," Papers 2512.18342, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.18342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.18342
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Belloni & D. Chen & V. Chernozhukov & C. Hansen, 2012. "Sparse Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments With an Application to Eminent Domain," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(6), pages 2369-2429, November.
    2. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769, December.
    3. Mogstad, Magne & Torgovitsky, Alexander, 2024. "Instrumental variables with unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    4. Magne Mogstad & Alexander Torgovitsky, 2024. "Instrumental Variables with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Treatment Effects," NBER Working Papers 32927, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Bekker, Paul A, 1994. "Alternative Approximations to the Distributions of Instrumental Variable Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 657-681, May.
    6. Jacob M. Montgomery & Brendan Nyhan & Michelle Torres, 2018. "How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(3), pages 760-775, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing, Kecen & Liao, Wen-Chi, 2026. "Expressways, market access, and industrial development in China: Using walled-city panel instrumental variables of minimum spanning tree," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Abadie, Alberto & Gu, Jiaying & Shen, Shu, 2024. "Instrumental variable estimation with first-stage heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    3. Zhaonan Qu & Yongchan Kwon, 2024. "Distributionally Robust Instrumental Variables Estimation," Papers 2410.15634, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    4. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Christian Hansen & Kengo Kato, 2018. "High-dimensional econometrics and regularized GMM," CeMMAP working papers CWP35/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2026. "Estimating Causal Effects With Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 356-382, June.
    6. Christoph Dworschak, 2024. "Bias mitigation in empirical peace and conflict studies: A short primer on posttreatment variables," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(3), pages 462-476, May.
    7. Caballero, Julián, 2021. "Corporate dollar debt and depreciations: All’s well that ends well?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Chen, Jiafeng, 2026. "Nonparametric treatment effect identification in school choice," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    9. Frank Windmeijer & Helmut Farbmacher & Neil Davies & George Davey Smith, 2019. "On the Use of the Lasso for Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(527), pages 1339-1350, July.
    10. Liyu Dou & Pengjin Min & Wenjie Wang & Yichong Zhang, 2025. "An Improved Inference for IV Regressions," Papers 2506.23816, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    11. Marine Carrasco & Guy Tchuente, 2016. "Efficient Estimation with Many Weak Instruments Using Regularization Techniques," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8-10), pages 1609-1637, December.
    12. Federico Crudu & Giovanni Mellace & Zsolt S'andor, 2026. "Jackknife Instrumental Variable Inference," Papers 2604.15437, arXiv.org.
    13. Bakhitov, Edvard, 2025. "On machine learning instrumental variable estimators," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    14. Gyuhyeong Goh & Jisang Yu, 2022. "Causal inference with some invalid instrumental variables: A quasi‐Bayesian approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(6), pages 1432-1451, December.
    15. Qingliang Fan & Yaqian Wu, 2020. "Endogenous Treatment Effect Estimation with some Invalid and Irrelevant Instruments," Papers 2006.14998, arXiv.org.
    16. Guy Tchuente, 2021. "A Note on the Topology of the First Stage of 2SLS with Many Instruments," Papers 2106.15003, arXiv.org.
    17. Tom Boot & Didier Nibbering, 2024. "Inference on LATEs with covariates," Papers 2402.12607, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    18. Michal Kolesár & Raj Chetty & John Friedman & Edward Glaeser & Guido W. Imbens, 2015. "Identification and Inference With Many Invalid Instruments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 474-484, October.
    19. Imbens, Guido W., 2014. "Instrumental Variables: An Econometrician's Perspective," IZA Discussion Papers 8048, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Dovonon, Prosper & Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Aguessy, Michael, 2024. "Relevant Moment Selection Under Mixed Identification Strength," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(5), pages 1003-1064, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.18342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.