IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.16357.html

Two-Sided Market Design for Goods with Perishable Utility

Author

Listed:
  • Chengqi Zang
  • Gabriel P. Andrade

Abstract

We study two-sided market design for goods whose utility perishes if unconsumed. Motivated by decentralized compute markets, we propose a mechanism that decouples price discovery from allocation; a load-based posted-price rule determines a per-period market price, while a greedy matching algorithm with second-price payments handles job assignment. We prove existence and uniqueness of equilibria, and give sufficient conditions under which equilibria are admissible~(i.e., active supply covers demand without rationing). On the allocation side, we show that the welfare-optimal matching algorithm is not strategy-proof and introduce Cheapest-Feasible Matching with Second-Price Payment~(CFM-SP), under which myopic providers truthfully report costs while staking their full availability. CFM-SP achieves a tight $1/2$-competitive ratio for demand-side welfare under adversarial arrivals; when providers' costs are monotone in availability, the ratio improves to~$1$.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengqi Zang & Gabriel P. Andrade, 2025. "Two-Sided Market Design for Goods with Perishable Utility," Papers 2511.16357, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.16357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16357
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gisches, Eyran J. & Qi, Hang & Becker, William J. & Rapoport, Amnon, 2021. "Strategic retailers and myopic consumers: Competitive pricing of perishable goods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Dilip Mookherjee, 2006. "Decentralization, Hierarchies, and Incentives: A Mechanism Design Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(2), pages 367-390, June.
    3. Nicolas Figueroa & Vasiliki Skreta, 2006. "The Role of Outside Options in Auction Design," Levine's Bibliography 321307000000000140, UCLA Department of Economics.
    4. Vijay Krishna & Motty Perry, 1997. "Efficient Mechanism Design," Game Theory and Information 9703010, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Apr 1998.
    5. Guillermo Gallego & Ming Hu, 2014. "Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Assets Under Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1241-1259, May.
    6. Przemyslaw Rys & Maciej Sobolewski, 2020. "Two-sided platforms: dynamic pricing and multiple equilibria," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2020-14, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Harding, Matthew & Kettler, Kyle & Lamarche, Carlos & Ma, Lala, 2023. "The (alleged) environmental and social benefits of dynamic pricing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 574-593.
    8. Aaron L Bodoh-Creed & Jörn Boehnke & Brent Hickman, 2021. "How Efficient are Decentralized Auction Platforms?," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(1), pages 91-125.
    9. Huijie Peng & Yan Cheng & Xingyuan Li, 2023. "Real-Time Pricing Method for Spot Cloud Services with Non-Stationary Excess Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Ludwig Dierks & Sven Seuken, 2022. "Cloud Pricing: The Spot Market Strikes Back," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 105-122, January.
    11. Varun Gupta, 2024. "Technical Note—Greedy Algorithm for Multiway Matching with Bounded Regret," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1139-1155, May.
    12. Youyi Feng & Guillermo Gallego, 2000. "Perishable Asset Revenue Management with Markovian Time Dependent Demand Intensities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(7), pages 941-956, July.
    13. Paul L. Joskow & Catherine D. Wolfram, 2012. "Dynamic Pricing of Electricity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(3), pages 381-385, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Otero, Daniel F. & Escallón, Mariana & López, Cristina & Akhavan-Tabatabaei, Raha, 2019. "Optimal timing of airline promotions under dilution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 981-995.
    2. Hakim, Simon & Meehan, Brian, 2024. "Evaluation of public private partnerships in highways," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    4. Andrés Abeliuk & Gerardo Berbeglia & Pascal Van Hentenryck, 2015. "Bargaining Mechanisms for One-Way Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Régis Chenavaz & Corina Paraschiv & Gabriel Turinici, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing of New Products in Competitive Markets: A Mean-Field Game Approach," Working Papers hal-01592958, HAL.
    6. Jun Li & Serguei Netessine & Sergei Koulayev, 2018. "Price to Compete … with Many: How to Identify Price Competition in High-Dimensional Space," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4118-4136, September.
    7. William L. Cooper & Tito Homem-de-Mello & Anton J. Kleywegt, 2015. "Learning and Pricing with Models That Do Not Explicitly Incorporate Competition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 86-103, February.
    8. Spyros Arvanitis & Florian Seliger & Tobias Stucki, 2013. "The Relative Importance of Human Resource Management Practices for a Firm's Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 13-341, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    9. Demougin, Dominique M. & Fabel, Oliver, 2006. "The division of ownership in new ventures," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2006-047, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    10. Stefan Ambec & Michel Poitevin, 2016. "Decision-making in organizations: when to delegate and whom to delegate," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 20(2), pages 115-143, June.
    11. Antweiler, Werner & Muesgens, Felix, 2024. "The new merit order: The viability of energy-only electricity markets with only intermittent renewable energy sources and grid-scale storage," Ruhr Economic Papers 1064, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    12. Vasiliki Skreta & Nicolas Figueroa, 2007. "What to Put on the Table," Levine's Bibliography 843644000000000374, UCLA Department of Economics.
    13. Jorge Aseff & Hector Chade, 2008. "An optimal auction with identity‐dependent externalities," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(3), pages 731-746, September.
    14. Qi Chen & Qi Xu & Wenjie Wang, 2019. "Optimal Policies for the Pricing and Replenishment of Fashion Apparel considering the Effect of Fashion Level," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, February.
    15. Liu, Jing & Gao, Wei & Zhang, Xuewen & Zhang, Jie, 2026. "Identification and dynamic simulation of electric-vehicle charging demand drivers: a high-order hybrid method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    16. Jehiel, Philippe & Lamy, Laurent, 2014. "On discrimination in procurement auctions," CEPR Discussion Papers 9790, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Helm, Carsten & Mier, Mathias, 2021. "Steering the energy transition in a world of intermittent electricity supply: Optimal subsidies and taxes for renewables and storage," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Martin Dhaussy & Nandeeta Neerunjun & Hubert Stahn, 2025. "Optimal electricity consumption and storage under short-term renewable supply variability," Working Papers hal-05214514, HAL.
    19. Ryan Donnelly & Zi Li, 2022. "Dynamic Inventory Management with Mean-Field Competition," Papers 2210.17208, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    20. Nolan Ritter & Julia Anna Bingler, 2021. "Do homo sapiens know their prices? Insights on dysfunctional price mechanisms from a large field experiment," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 21/348, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.16357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.