IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.11761.html

Cost Transparency of Enterprise AI Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Soogand Alavi
  • Salar Nozari
  • Andrea Luangrath

Abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have dramatically improved performance on a wide range of tasks, driving rapid enterprise adoption. Yet, the cost of adopting these AI services is understudied. Unlike traditional software licensing in which costs are predictable before usage, commercial LLM services charge per token of input text in addition to generated output tokens. Crucially, while firms can control the input, they have limited control over output tokens, which are effectively set by generation dynamics outside of business control. This research shows that subtle shifts in linguistic style can systematically alter the number of output tokens without impacting response quality. Using an experiment with OpenAI's API, this study reveals that non-polite prompts significantly increase output tokens leading to higher enterprise costs and additional revenue for OpenAI. Politeness is merely one instance of a broader phenomenon in which linguistic structure can drive unpredictable cost variation. For enterprises integrating LLM into applications, this unpredictability complicates budgeting and undermines transparency in business-to-business contexts. By demonstrating how end-user behavior links to enterprise costs through output token counts, this work highlights the opacity of current pricing models and calls for new approaches to ensure predictable and transparent adoption of LLM services.

Suggested Citation

  • Soogand Alavi & Salar Nozari & Andrea Luangrath, 2025. "Cost Transparency of Enterprise AI Adoption," Papers 2511.11761, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.11761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.11761
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Goli & Amandeep Singh, 2024. "Frontiers: Can Large Language Models Capture Human Preferences?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 709-722, July.
    2. Akshina Banerjee & Oleg Urminsky, 2025. "The Language That Drives Engagement: A Systematic Large-scale Analysis of Headline Experiments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 566-592, May.
    3. Peiyao Li & Noah Castelo & Zsolt Katona & Miklos Sarvary, 2024. "Frontiers: Determining the Validity of Large Language Models for Automated Perceptual Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 254-266, March.
    4. Xi Li, 2025. "Endogenous Costs, Market Competition, and Disclosure," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 374-389, March.
    5. Bhavya Mohan & Ryan W. Buell & Leslie K. John, 2020. "Lifting the Veil: The Benefits of Cost Transparency," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1105-1121, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herhausen, Dennis & Ludwig, Stephan & Abedin, Ehsan & Haque, Nasim Ul & de Jong, David, 2025. "From words to insights: Text analysis in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Yuan Gao & Dokyun Lee & Gordon Burtch & Sina Fazelpour, 2024. "Take Caution in Using LLMs as Human Surrogates: Scylla Ex Machina," Papers 2410.19599, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    3. Dhruv Grewal & Cinthia B. Satornino & Thomas Davenport & Abhijit Guha, 2025. "How generative AI Is shaping the future of marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 702-722, May.
    4. Kiwoong Yoo & Michael Haenlein & Kelly Hewett, 2025. "A whole new world, a new fantastic point of view: Charting unexplored territories in consumer research with generative artificial intelligence," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 723-759, May.
    5. Jürgensmeier, Lukas & Skiera, Bernd, 2024. "Generative AI for scalable feedback to multimodal exercises," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 468-488.
    6. Qiang Chen & Tianyang Han & Jin Li & Ye Luo & Zigan Wang & Yuxiao Wu & Xiaowei Zhang & Tuo Zhou, 2025. "Can AI Master Econometrics? Evidence from Econometrics AI Agent on Expert-Level Tasks," Papers 2506.00856, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    7. Jan Ole Krugmann & Jochen Hartmann, 2024. "Sentiment Analysis in the Age of Generative AI," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Jiangbo Yu & Graeme McKinley, 2024. "Synthetic Participatory Planning of Shared Automated Electric Mobility Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-32, June.
    9. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 2022. "Supply chain fairness," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4304-4318, December.
    10. Shu Wang & Zijun Yao & Shuhuai Zhang & Jianuo Gai & Tracy Xiao Liu & Songfa Zhong, 2025. "When Experimental Economics Meets Large Language Models: Evidence-based Tactics," Papers 2505.21371, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    11. Kwanho Suk & Triza Mudita, 2021. "Charitable Organizations’ Cost Disclosure Mitigates Overhead Aversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Avinadav, Tal & Shamir, Noam, 2025. "Truth, trust, and trade-offs: When blockchain in supply chains backfires," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(3), pages 467-480.
    13. Xi Li & Xinlong Li, 2023. "The Bright Side of Inequity Aversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 4210-4227, July.
    14. Matthew O. Jackson & Qiaozhu Me & Stephanie W. Wang & Yutong Xie & Walter Yuan & Seth Benzell & Erik Brynjolfsson & Colin F. Camerer & James Evans & Brian Jabarian & Jon Kleinberg & Juanjuan Meng & Se, 2025. "AI Behavioral Science," Papers 2509.13323, arXiv.org.
    15. George Gui & Seungwoo Kim, 2025. "Leveraging LLMs to Improve Experimental Design: A Generative Stratification Approach," Papers 2509.25709, arXiv.org.
    16. Fasheng Xu & Jing Hou & Wei Chen & Karen Xie, 2025. "Generative AI and Organizational Structure in the Knowledge Economy," Papers 2506.00532, arXiv.org.
    17. Lessassy, Léopold, 2023. "Investigating a three-way interaction of manufacturer control, retail control and dependence on salesforce performance. Does the role of frontline employees matters ?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Leif Nelson & Duncan Simester & K. Sudhir, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Marketing Science and Field Experiments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1033-1038, November.
    19. Michael Ahearne & Yashar Atefi & Son K. Lam & Mohsen Pourmasoudi, 2022. "The future of buyer–seller interactions: a conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 22-45, January.
    20. Shuaiyu Chen & T. Clifton Green & Huseyin Gulen & Dexin Zhou, 2024. "What Does ChatGPT Make of Historical Stock Returns? Extrapolation and Miscalibration in LLM Stock Return Forecasts," Papers 2409.11540, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.11761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.