IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2312.03536.html

Revealing Sequential Rationality and Forward Induction

Author

Listed:
  • Pierfrancesco Guarino

Abstract

Given a dynamic ordinal game, we deem a strategy sequentially rational if there exist a Bernoulli utility function and a conditional probability system with respect to which the strategy is a maximizer. We establish a complete class theorem by characterizing sequential rationality via the new Conditional B-Dominance. Building on this notion, we introduce Iterative Conditional B-Dominance, which is an iterative elimination procedure that characterizes the implications of forward induction in the class of games under scrutiny and selects the unique backward induction outcome in dynamic ordinal games with perfect information satisfying a genericity condition. Additionally, we show that Iterative Conditional B-Dominance, as a `forward induction reasoning' solution concept, captures: $(i)$ the unique backward induction outcome obtained via sophisticated voting in binary agendas with sequential majority voting; $(ii)$ farsightedness in dynamic ordinal games derived from social environments; $(iii)$ a unique outcome in ordinal Money-Burning Games.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierfrancesco Guarino, 2023. "Revealing Sequential Rationality and Forward Induction," Papers 2312.03536, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.03536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.03536
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyle Bagwell & Garey Ramey, 1996. "Capacity, Entry, and Forward Induction," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 27(4), pages 660-680, Winter.
    2. Kin Chung Lo, 2000. "Rationalizability and the savage axioms," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 15(3), pages 727-733.
    3. Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 2003. "A derivation of expected utility maximization in the context of a game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 172-182, July.
    4. Dekel, Eddie & Siniscalchi, Marciano, 2015. "Epistemic Game Theory," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Damme, Eric, 2002. "Strategic equilibrium," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 41, pages 1521-1596, Elsevier.
    2. Catonini, Emiliano & De Vito, Nicodemo, 2024. "Cautious belief and iterated admissibility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Jean-Pierre Ponssard, 2008. "Short term entry barriers may be good for long term competition," Working Papers hal-00347663, HAL.
    4. Ziv Hellman & Miklós Pintér, 2022. "Charges and bets: a general characterisation of common priors," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 51(3), pages 567-587, November.
    5. Battigalli, Pierpaolo & Leonetti, Paolo & Maccheroni, Fabio, 2020. "Behavioral equivalence of extensive game structures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 533-547.
    6. Xiao Luo & Xuewen Qian & Chen Qu, 2020. "Iterated elimination procedures," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(2), pages 437-465, September.
    7. Castillo, Marco E. & Cross, Philip J., 2008. "Of mice and men: Within gender variation in strategic behavior," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 421-432, November.
    8. Ohnishi, Kazuhiro, 2019. "Capacity choice in an international mixed triopoly," MPRA Paper 94051, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Joseph Y. Halpern & Yoram Moses, 2017. "Characterizing solution concepts in terms of common knowledge of rationality," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 457-473, May.
    10. Shuige Liu, 2024. "Level-$k$ Reasoning, Cognitive Hierarchy, and Rationalizability," Papers 2404.19623, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    11. Pierfrancesco Guarino, 2025. "Topology-free type structures with conditioning events," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 79(4), pages 1107-1166, June.
    12. Ruqu Wang & Quan Wen, 1998. "Strategic Invasion in Markets with Switching Costs," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 521-549, December.
    13. Manili, Julien, 2024. "Order independence for rationalizability," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 152-160.
    14. Wickelgren, Abraham L., 2006. "The effect of exit on entry deterrence strategies," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 226-240, January.
    15. Gabriel Ziegler, 2021. "Informational Robustness of Common Belief in Rationality," Papers 2103.02402, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    16. De Vito, Nicodemo, 2024. "Complete conditional type structures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 427-448.
    17. Shuige Liu, 2018. "Characterizing Assumption of Rationality by Incomplete Information," Papers 1801.04714, arXiv.org.
    18. Perea, Andrés, 2025. "Dynamic consistency in games without expected utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Epstein, Larry G., 2000. "Are Probabilities Used in Markets ?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 86-90, March.
    20. Fabrizio Germano & Peio Zuazo-Garin, 2017. "Bounded rationality and correlated equilibria," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(3), pages 595-629, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.03536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.