IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2310.11987.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Framework for Treating Model Uncertainty in the Asset Liability Management Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios I. Papayiannis

Abstract

The problem of asset liability management (ALM) is a classic problem of the financial mathematics and of great interest for the banking institutions and insurance companies. Several formulations of this problem under various model settings have been studied under the Mean-Variance (MV) principle perspective. In this paper, the ALM problem is revisited under the context of model uncertainty in the one-stage framework. In practice, uncertainty issues appear to several aspects of the problem, e.g. liability process characteristics, market conditions, inflation rates, inside information effects, etc. A framework relying on the notion of the Wasserstein barycenter is presented which is able to treat robustly this type of ambiguities by appropriate handling the various information sources (models) and appropriately reformulating the relevant decision making problem. The proposed framework can be applied to a number of different model settings leading to the selection of investment portfolios that remain robust to the various uncertainties appearing in the market. The paper is concluded with a numerical experiment for a static version of the ALM problem, employing standard modelling approaches, illustrating the capabilities of the proposed method with very satisfactory results in retrieving the true optimal strategy even in high noise cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios I. Papayiannis, 2023. "A Framework for Treating Model Uncertainty in the Asset Liability Management Problem," Papers 2310.11987, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.11987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.11987
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci & Aldo Rustichini, 2006. "Ambiguity Aversion, Robustness, and the Variational Representation of Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(6), pages 1447-1498, November.
    2. Leippold, Markus & Trojani, Fabio & Vanini, Paolo, 2004. "A geometric approach to multiperiod mean variance optimization of assets and liabilities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1079-1113, March.
    3. Jian Pan & Qingxian Xiao, 2017. "Optimal mean–variance asset-liability management with stochastic interest rates and inflation risks," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 85(3), pages 491-519, June.
    4. Zhang, Miao & Chen, Ping, 2016. "Mean–variance asset–liability management under constant elasticity of variance process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 11-18.
    5. Chiu, Mei Choi & Li, Duan, 2006. "Asset and liability management under a continuous-time mean-variance optimization framework," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 330-355, December.
    6. Lars Peter Hansen & Thomas J Sargent, 2014. "Robust Control and Model Uncertainty," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: UNCERTAINTY WITHIN ECONOMIC MODELS, chapter 5, pages 145-154, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. G. I. Papayiannis & A. N. Yannacopoulos, 2018. "Convex risk measures for the aggregation of multiple information sources and applications in insurance," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2018(9), pages 792-822, October.
    8. Chen, Ping & Yang, Hailiang & Yin, George, 2008. "Markowitz's mean-variance asset-liability management with regime switching: A continuous-time model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 456-465, December.
    9. Wei, J. & Wong, K.C. & Yam, S.C.P. & Yung, S.P., 2013. "Markowitz’s mean–variance asset–liability management with regime switching: A time-consistent approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 281-291.
    10. Chiu, Mei Choi & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2014. "Mean–variance asset–liability management with asset correlation risk and insurance liabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 300-310.
    11. G. I. Papayiannis & G. N. Galanis & A. N. Yannacopoulos, 2018. "Model aggregation using optimal transport and applications in wind speed forecasting," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(8), December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Danping & Shen, Yang & Zeng, Yan, 2018. "Dynamic derivative-based investment strategy for mean–variance asset–liability management with stochastic volatility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 72-86.
    2. Yumo Zhang, 2023. "Robust Optimal Investment Strategies for Mean-Variance Asset-Liability Management Under 4/2 Stochastic Volatility Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Esfandi, Elaheh & Mousavi, Mir Hossein & Moshrefi, Rassam & Farhang-Moghaddam, Babak, 2020. "Insurer Optimal Asset Allocation in a Small and Closed Economy: The Case of Iran’s Social Security Organization," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 15(4), pages 445-461, October.
    4. Wei, Jiaqin & Wang, Tianxiao, 2017. "Time-consistent mean–variance asset–liability management with random coefficients," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 84-96.
    5. Jian Pan & Qingxian Xiao, 2017. "Optimal mean–variance asset-liability management with stochastic interest rates and inflation risks," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 85(3), pages 491-519, June.
    6. Yuanyuan Zhang & Xiang Li & Sini Guo, 2018. "Portfolio selection problems with Markowitz’s mean–variance framework: a review of literature," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 125-158, June.
    7. Zhang, Miao & Chen, Ping, 2016. "Mean–variance asset–liability management under constant elasticity of variance process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 11-18.
    8. Zhang, Miao & Chen, Ping & Yao, Haixiang, 2017. "Mean-variance portfolio selection with only risky assets under regime switching," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 35-42.
    9. Yao, Haixiang & Li, Zhongfei & Chen, Shumin, 2014. "Continuous-time mean–variance portfolio selection with only risky assets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 244-251.
    10. Yao, Haixiang & Zeng, Yan & Chen, Shumin, 2013. "Multi-period mean–variance asset–liability management with uncontrolled cash flow and uncertain time-horizon," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 492-500.
    11. Qian Zhao & Jiaqin Wei & Rongming Wang, 2013. "Mean-Variance Asset-Liability Management with State-Dependent Risk Aversion," Papers 1304.7882, arXiv.org.
    12. Yao, Haixiang & Lai, Yongzeng & Li, Yong, 2013. "Continuous-time mean–variance asset–liability management with endogenous liabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 6-17.
    13. Wei, J. & Wong, K.C. & Yam, S.C.P. & Yung, S.P., 2013. "Markowitz’s mean–variance asset–liability management with regime switching: A time-consistent approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 281-291.
    14. Yan, Tingjin & Han, Jinhui & Ma, Guiyuan & Siu, Chi Chung, 2023. "Dynamic asset-liability management with frictions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 57-83.
    15. Georgios I. Papayiannis, 2022. "Static Hedging of Freight Risk under Model Uncertainty," Papers 2207.00862, arXiv.org.
    16. Yao, Haixiang & Li, Zhongfei & Li, Duan, 2016. "Multi-period mean-variance portfolio selection with stochastic interest rate and uncontrollable liability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 837-851.
    17. Hansen, Lars Peter & Sargent, Thomas J., 2022. "Structured ambiguity and model misspecification," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2011. "Economic Models as Analogies," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-001, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    19. repec:esx:essedp:770 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Junyi Chai & Zhiquan Weng & Wenbin Liu, 2021. "Behavioral Decision Making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    21. Marciano Siniscalchi, 2009. "Vector Expected Utility and Attitudes Toward Variation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 801-855, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.11987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.