IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2310.11472.html

The Sponge Cake Dilemma over the Nile: Achieving Fairness in Resource Allocation with Cake Cutting Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Dwayne Woods

Abstract

This article explores the intricate dynamics of the Nile Basin dispute, a complex conflict involving Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan. Our central argument is that we can gain unique insights into this dispute by employing the principles of game theory and the Steinhaus cake-cutting problem - a mathematical model of fair division. These theoretical frameworks offer a novel perspective to understand the motivations and potential actions of the involved nations. More importantly, these concepts can illuminate potential pathways toward a resolution that ensures equitable resource allocation and maintains regional stability. We will analyze the conflict and explore potential solutions to this enduring dispute through this lens.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwayne Woods, 2023. "The Sponge Cake Dilemma over the Nile: Achieving Fairness in Resource Allocation with Cake Cutting Algorithms," Papers 2310.11472, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.11472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.11472
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marian J. Patrick, 2014. "The Cycles and Spirals of Justice in water-allocation decision making," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 63-80, January.
    2. Jeroen Warner & Neda Zawahri, 2012. "Hegemony and asymmetry: multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 215-229, September.
    3. Haileyesus Belay Lakew & Semu Ayalew Moges & Emmanouil N. Anagnostou & Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos & Dereje Hailu Asfaw, 2020. "Evaluation of Global Water Resources Reanalysis Runoff Products for Local Water Resources Applications: Case Study-Upper Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(7), pages 2157-2177, May.
    4. Kyropoulou, Maria & Ortega, Josué & Segal-Halevi, Erel, 2022. "Fair cake-cutting in practice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 28-49.
    5. Zeray Yihdego & Alistair Rieu-Clarke, 2016. "An exploration of fairness in international law through the Blue Nile and GERD," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 528-549, June.
    6. Thomson, William, 2015. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-59.
    7. Ramzi Suleiman, 2022. "Economic Harmony—A Rational Theory of Fairness and Cooperation in Strategic Interactions," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Kevin G. Wheeler & Mohammed Basheer & Zelalem T. Mekonnen & Sami O. Eltoum & Azeb Mersha & Gamal M. Abdo & Edith A. Zagona & Jim W. Hall & Simon J. Dadson, 2016. "Cooperative filling approaches for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 611-634, June.
    9. Ana Elisa Cascão & Alan Nicol, 2016. "GERD: new norms of cooperation in the Nile Basin?," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 550-573, June.
    10. Maria Kyropoulou & Josu'e Ortega & Erel Segal-Halevi, 2018. "Fair Cake-Cutting in Practice," Papers 1810.08243, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josué Ortega & Erel Segal-Halevi, 2022. "Obvious manipulations in cake-cutting," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(4), pages 969-988, November.
    2. Hadi Hosseini, 2023. "The Fairness Fair: Bringing Human Perception into Collective Decision-Making," Papers 2312.14402, arXiv.org.
    3. Takuma Wakayama, 2017. "Bribe-proofness for single-peaked preferences: characterizations and maximality-of-domains results," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(2), pages 357-385, August.
    4. Liu, Peng & Xu, Sijia, 2024. "Packaging for allocation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Wulf Gaertner & Richard Bradley & Yongsheng Xu & Lars Schwettmann, 2019. "Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
    7. Monyei, Chukwuka G. & Akpeji, Kingsley O. & Oladeji, Olamide & Babatunde, Olubayo M. & Aholu, Okechukwu C. & Adegoke, Damilola & Imafidon, Justus O., 2022. "Regional cooperation for mitigating energy poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: A context-based approach through the tripartite lenses of access, sufficiency, and mobility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & António Osório & Josep E. Peris, 2015. "From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, March.
    9. Sanchez-Soriano, Joaquin, 2021. "Families of sequential priority rules and random arrival rules with withdrawal limits," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 136-148.
    10. Pan Liu & Yang Zheng & Yukun Yang & Hao Wang & Xuefeng Sang & Siqi Zhang, 2025. "Exploration of Equity Cooperation Concepts in Water Resource Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(1), pages 473-502, January.
    11. Tamas Solymosi & Balazs Sziklai, 2015. "Universal Characterization Sets for the Nucleolus in Balanced Games," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1512, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    12. Paula Hanasz, 2017. "A Little Less Conversation? Track II Dialogue and Transboundary Water Governance," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 296-309, May.
    13. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2018. "Bankruptcy games with nontransferable utility," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-21.
    14. Siddig, Khalid & Basheer, Mohammed & Luckmann, Jonas & Grethe, Harald, 2019. "Long-term economy-wide impacts of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on Sudan," Conference papers 333118, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Sherien Abdel Aziz & Martina Zeleňáková & Peter Mésároš & Pavol Purcz & Hany Abd-Elhamid, 2019. "Assessing the Potential Impacts of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on Water Resources and Soil Salinity in the Nile Delta, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Csóka, Péter & Illés, Ferenc & Solymosi, Tamás, 2022. "On the Shapley value of liability games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 378-386.
    17. Sylvain Ferrières, 2017. "Nullified equal loss property and equal division values," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 385-406, October.
    18. Flores-Szwagrzak, Karol & Treibich, Rafael, 2025. "How much can you claim?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    19. Thomson, William, 2016. "A new characterization of the proportional rule for claims problems," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 255-257.
    20. Jaume García-Segarra & Miguel Ginés-Vilar, 2023. "Additive adjudication of conflicting claims," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 93-116, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.11472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.