IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2303.05888.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Distributionally Robust Random Utility Model

Author

Listed:
  • David Muller
  • Emerson Melo
  • Ruben Schlotter

Abstract

This paper introduces the distributionally robust random utility model (DRO-RUM), which allows the preference shock (unobserved heterogeneity) distribution to be misspecified or unknown. We make three contributions using tools from the literature on robust optimization. First, by exploiting the notion of distributionally robust social surplus function, we show that the DRO-RUM endogenously generates a shock distributionthat incorporates a correlation between the utilities of the different alternatives. Second, we show that the gradient of the distributionally robust social surplus yields the choice probability vector. This result generalizes the celebrated William-Daly-Zachary theorem to environments where the shock distribution is unknown. Third, we show how the DRO-RUM allows us to nonparametrically identify the mean utility vector associated with choice market data. This result extends the demand inversion approach to environments where the shock distribution is unknown or misspecified. We carry out several numerical experiments comparing the performance of the DRO-RUM with the traditional multinomial logit and probit models.

Suggested Citation

  • David Muller & Emerson Melo & Ruben Schlotter, 2023. "A Distributionally Robust Random Utility Model," Papers 2303.05888, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2303.05888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.05888
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fosgerau, Mogens & Melo, Emerson & Shum, Matthew & Sørensen, Jesper R.-V., 2021. "Some remarks on CCP-based estimators of dynamic models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Lixiong Li, 2018. "A General Method for Demand Inversion," Papers 1802.04444, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2018.
    3. V. Joseph Hotz & Robert A. Miller, 1993. "Conditional Choice Probabilities and the Estimation of Dynamic Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(3), pages 497-529.
    4. Karthik Natarajan & Miao Song & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2009. "Persistency Model and Its Applications in Choice Modeling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 453-469, March.
    5. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    6. Khai Xiang Chiong & Alfred Galichon & Matt Shum, 2016. "Duality in dynamic discrete‐choice models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 7(1), pages 83-115, March.
    7. Mogens Fosgerau & Julien Monardo & André de Palma, 2019. "The Inverse Product Differentiation Logit Model," Working Papers hal-02183411, HAL.
    8. A. Ben-Tal & M. Teboulle, 1987. "Penalty Functions and Duality in Stochastic Programming Via (phi)-Divergence Functionals," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 224-240, May.
    9. Jacob Marschak, 1959. "Binary Choice Constraints on Random Utility Indicators," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 74, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    10. Berry, Steven & Levinsohn, James & Pakes, Ariel, 1995. "Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 841-890, July.
    11. H.D. Block & Jacob Marschak, 1959. "Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Response," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 66, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    12. Timothy Christensen & Benjamin Connault, 2023. "Counterfactual Sensitivity and Robustness," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(1), pages 263-298, January.
    13. Guiyun Feng & Xiaobo Li & Zizhuo Wang, 2017. "Technical Note—On the Relation Between Several Discrete Choice Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1516-1525, December.
    14. Steven Berry & Ariel Pakes, 2007. "The Pure Characteristics Demand Model," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1193-1225, November.
    15. Vinit Kumar Mishra & Karthik Natarajan & Dhanesh Padmanabhan & Chung-Piaw Teo & Xiaobo Li, 2014. "On Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Marginal Distribution Choice Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1511-1531, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fosgerau, Mogens & Melo, Emerson & Shum, Matthew & Sørensen, Jesper R.-V., 2021. "Some remarks on CCP-based estimators of dynamic models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Roy Allen & John Rehbeck, 2020. "Identification of Random Coefficient Latent Utility Models," Papers 2003.00276, arXiv.org.
    3. Odran Bonnet & Alfred Galichon & Yu-Wei Hsieh & Keith O’Hara & Matt Shum, 2022. "Yogurts Choose Consumers? Estimation of Random-Utility Models via Two-Sided Matching [Unobserved Product Differentiation in Discrete-Choice Models: Estimating Price Elasticities and Welfare Effects," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(6), pages 3085-3114.
    4. Emerson Melo, 2021. "Learning in Random Utility Models Via Online Decision Problems," Papers 2112.10993, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    5. Alfred Galichon & Bernard Salani'e, 2021. "Cupid's Invisible Hand: Social Surplus and Identification in Matching Models," Papers 2106.02371, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    6. Sørensen, Jesper R.-V. & Fosgerau, Mogens, 2022. "How McFadden met Rockafellar and learned to do more with less," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Qi Feng & J. George Shanthikumar & Mengying Xue, 2022. "Consumer Choice Models and Estimation: A Review and Extension," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 847-867, February.
    8. Nicolai V. Kuminoff & V. Kerry Smith & Christopher Timmins, 2010. "The New Economics of Equilibrium Sorting and its Transformational Role for Policy Evaluation," NBER Working Papers 16349, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Nikhil Agarwal & Paulo J. Somaini, 2022. "Demand Analysis under Latent Choice Constraints," NBER Working Papers 29993, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Yi-Chun Chen & Velibor V. Mišić, 2022. "Decision Forest: A Nonparametric Approach to Modeling Irrational Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7090-7111, October.
    11. Liang Chen & Eugene Choo & Alfred Galichon & Simon Weber, 2023. "Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium with Substitutes, with Applications to Matching and Discrete Choice Models," Papers 2309.11416, arXiv.org.
    12. Steven T. Berry & Philip A. Haile, 2021. "Foundations of Demand Estimation," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2301, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    13. Andrew Ching & Susumu Imai & Masakazu Ishihara & Neelam Jain, 2012. "A practitioner’s guide to Bayesian estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 151-196, June.
    14. Zhenzhen Yan & Karthik Natarajan & Chung Piaw Teo & Cong Cheng, 2022. "A Representative Consumer Model in Data-Driven Multiproduct Pricing Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5798-5827, August.
    15. Aydın Alptekinoğlu & John H. Semple, 2016. "The Exponomial Choice Model: A New Alternative for Assortment and Price Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 79-93, February.
    16. Mogens Fosgerau & Emerson Melo & André de Palma & Matthew Shum, 2020. "Discrete Choice And Rational Inattention: A General Equivalence Result," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1569-1589, November.
    17. Ningyuan Chen & Guillermo Gallego & Zhuodong Tang, 2019. "The Use of Binary Choice Forests to Model and Estimate Discrete Choices," Papers 1908.01109, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    18. Steven T. Berry & Philip A. Haile, 2009. "Nonparametric Identification of Multinomial Choice Demand Models with Heterogeneous Consumers," NBER Working Papers 15276, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Daniel Ackerberg, 2009. "A new use of importance sampling to reduce computational burden in simulation estimation," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 343-376, December.
    20. Nikhil Agarwal & Eric Budish, 2021. "Market Design," NBER Working Papers 29367, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2303.05888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.