IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2209.00197.html

Switchback Experiments under Geometric Mixing

Author

Listed:
  • Yuchen Hu
  • Stefan Wager

Abstract

The switchback is an experimental design that measures treatment effects by repeatedly turning an intervention on and off for a whole system. Switchback experiments are a robust way to overcome cross-unit spillover effects; however, they are vulnerable to bias from temporal carryovers. In this paper, we consider properties of switchback experiments in Markovian systems that mix at a geometric rate. We find that, in this setting, standard switchback designs suffer considerably from carryover bias: Their estimation error decays as $T^{-1/3}$ in terms of the experiment horizon $T$, whereas in the absence of carryovers a faster rate of $T^{-1/2}$ would have been possible. We also show, however, that judicious use of burn-in periods can considerably improve the situation, and enables errors that decay as $\log(T)^{1/2}T^{-1/2}$. Our formal results are mirrored in an empirical evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuchen Hu & Stefan Wager, 2022. "Switchback Experiments under Geometric Mixing," Papers 2209.00197, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2209.00197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.00197
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinran Li & Peng Ding, 2017. "General Forms of Finite Population Central Limit Theorems with Applications to Causal Inference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(520), pages 1759-1769, October.
    2. Charles F. Manski, 2013. "Identification of treatment response with social interactions," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Michael P. Leung, 2022. "Causal Inference Under Approximate Neighborhood Interference," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 267-293, January.
    4. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luofeng Liao & Christian Kroer, 2023. "Statistical Inference and A/B Testing for First-Price Pacing Equilibria," Papers 2301.02276, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    2. Shuze Chen & David Simchi-Levi & Chonghuan Wang, 2024. "Improving the Estimation of Lifetime Effects in A/B Testing via Treatment Locality," Papers 2407.19618, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    3. Li, Ting & Shi, Chengchun & Lu, Zhaohua & Li, Yi & Zhu, Hongtu, 2024. "Evaluating dynamic conditional quantile treatment effects with applications in ridesharing," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122488, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Evan Munro & David Jones & Jennifer Brennan & Roland Nelet & Vahab Mirrokni & Jean Pouget-Abadie, 2023. "Causal Estimation of User Learning in Personalized Systems," Papers 2306.00485, arXiv.org.
    5. Luofeng Liao & Christian Kroer, 2024. "Statistical Inference and A/B Testing in Fisher Markets and Paced Auctions," Papers 2406.15522, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    6. Nian Si, 2023. "Tackling Interference Induced by Data Training Loops in A/B Tests: A Weighted Training Approach," Papers 2310.17496, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    7. Ruohan Zhan & Shichao Han & Yuchen Hu & Zhenling Jiang, 2024. "Estimating Treatment Effects under Algorithmic Interference: A Structured Neural Networks Approach," Papers 2406.14380, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    8. Han, Kevin & Basse, Guillaume & Bojinov, Iavor, 2024. "Population interference in panel experiments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    9. Ke Sun & Linglong Kong & Hongtu Zhu & Chengchun Shi, 2024. "ARMA-Design: Optimal Treatment Allocation Strategies for A/B Testing in Partially Observable Time Series Experiments," Papers 2408.05342, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    10. Shan Huang & Chen Wang & Yuan Yuan & Jinglong Zhao & Brocco & Zhang, 2023. "Estimating Effects of Long-Term Treatments," Papers 2308.08152, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Kevin & Basse, Guillaume & Bojinov, Iavor, 2024. "Population interference in panel experiments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    2. Haoge Chang, 2023. "Design-based Estimation Theory for Complex Experiments," Papers 2311.06891, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    3. Yuehao Bai & Azeem M. Shaikh & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2024. "A Primer on the Analysis of Randomized Experiments and a Survey of some Recent Advances," Papers 2405.03910, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    4. Jinglong Zhao, 2024. "Experimental Design For Causal Inference Through An Optimization Lens," Papers 2408.09607, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    5. Zhexiao Lin & Peng Ding, 2025. "Unifying regression-based and design-based causal inference in time-series experiments," Papers 2510.22864, arXiv.org.
    6. Sadegh Shirani & Mohsen Bayati, 2025. "On Evolution-Based Models for Experimentation Under Interference," Papers 2511.21675, arXiv.org.
    7. Gao, Mengsi & Ding, Peng, 2025. "Causal inference in network experiments: Regression-based analysis and design-based properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PA).
    8. Nicolas Debarsy & Julie Le Gallo, 2025. "Identification of Spatial Spillovers: Do's and Don'ts," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 2152-2173, December.
    9. Zihan Zhang & Lianyan Fu & Dehui Wang, 2026. "Difference-in-Differences using Double Negative Controls and Graph Neural Networks for Unmeasured Network Confounding," Papers 2601.00603, arXiv.org.
    10. repec:hal:journl:hal-04549691 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Tadao Hoshino & Takahide Yanagi, 2024. "Causal Inference with Noncompliance and Unknown Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(548), pages 2869-2880, October.
    12. Michael P. Leung, 2021. "Rate-Optimal Cluster-Randomized Designs for Spatial Interference," Papers 2111.04219, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    13. Tadao Hoshino, 2021. "Estimating a Continuous Treatment Model with Spillovers: A Control Function Approach," Papers 2112.15114, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    14. Clément de Chaisemartin, 2022. "Trading-off Bias and Variance in Stratified Experiments and in Staggered Adoption Designs, Under a Boundedness Condition on the Magnitude of the Treatment Effect," Working Papers hal-03873919, HAL.
    15. Julius Owusu, 2023. "Randomization Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Network Interference," Papers 2308.00202, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    16. Hao, Shiming, 2021. "True structure change, spurious treatment effect? A novel approach to disentangle treatment effects from structure changes," MPRA Paper 108679, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Susan Athey & Dean Eckles & Guido W. Imbens, 2018. "Exact p-Values for Network Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(521), pages 230-240, January.
    18. Mariluz Mate, 2026. "What Is a Causal Effect When Firms Interact? Counterfactuals and Interdependence," Papers 2601.00279, arXiv.org.
    19. Graham, Bryan S. & Imbens, Guido W. & Ridder, Geert, 2025. "Measuring the effects of segregation in the presence of social spillovers: A nonparametric approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PB).
    20. Denis Fougère & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2020. "Policy Evaluation Using Causal Inference Methods," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03455978, HAL.
    21. Peter Z. Schochet, 2018. "Design-Based Estimators for Average Treatment Effects for Multi-Armed RCTs," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(5), pages 568-593, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2209.00197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.