IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2203.13740.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A generalized precision matrix for t-Student distributions in portfolio optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Karoline Bax
  • Emanuele Taufer
  • Sandra Paterlini

Abstract

The Markowitz model is still the cornerstone of modern portfolio theory. In particular, when focusing on the minimum-variance portfolio, the covariance matrix or better its inverse, the so-called precision matrix, is the only input required. So far, most scholars worked on improving the estimation of the input, however little attention has been given to the limitations of the inverse covariance matrix when capturing the dependence structure in a non-Gaussian setting. While the precision matrix allows to correctly understand the conditional dependence structure of random vectors in a Gaussian setting, the inverse of the covariance matrix might not necessarily result in a reliable source of information when Gaussianity fails. In this paper, exploiting the local dependence function, different definitions of the generalized precision matrix (GPM), which holds for a general class of distributions, are provided. In particular, we focus on the multivariate t-Student distribution and point out that the interaction in random vectors does not depend only on the inverse of the covariance matrix, but also on additional elements. We test the performance of the proposed GPM using a minimum-variance portfolio set-up by considering S\&P 100 and Fama and French industry data. We show that portfolios relying on the GPM often generate statistically significant lower out-of-sample variances than state-of-art methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Karoline Bax & Emanuele Taufer & Sandra Paterlini, 2022. "A generalized precision matrix for t-Student distributions in portfolio optimization," Papers 2203.13740, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2203.13740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.13740
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2004. "A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 365-411, February.
    2. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    3. Sreenivasa Rao Jammalamadaka & Emanuele Taufer & Gyorgy H. Terdik, 2021. "On Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 607-644, August.
    4. Peng Ding, 2016. "On the Conditional Distribution of the Multivariate Distribution," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 293-295, July.
    5. Bloomfield, Ted & Leftwich, Richard & Long, John Jr., 1977. "Portfolio strategies and performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 201-218, November.
    6. R. Cont, 2001. "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 223-236.
    7. Jones, M. C., 1998. "Constant Local Dependence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 148-155, February.
    8. Guy V. G. Stevens, 1998. "On the Inverse of the Covariance Matrix in Portfolio Analysis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 53(5), pages 1821-1827, October.
    9. A. Capitanio & A. Azzalini & E. Stanghellini, 2003. "Graphical models for skew‐normal variates," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 30(1), pages 129-144, March.
    10. Saralees Nadarajah & Kosto Mitov & Samuel Kotz, 2003. "Local dependence functions for extreme value distributions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(10), pages 1081-1100.
    11. Jones, M. C., 2002. "A dependent bivariate t distribution with marginals on different degrees of freedom," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 163-170, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Coqueret, 2016. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02088097, HAL.
    2. Nathan Lassance & Frédéric Vrins, 2021. "Minimum Rényi entropy portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 23-46, April.
    3. Vincent Tan & Stefan Zohren, 2020. "Estimation of Large Financial Covariances: A Cross-Validation Approach," Papers 2012.05757, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    4. Torri, Gabriele & Giacometti, Rosella & Tichý, Tomáš, 2021. "Network tail risk estimation in the European banking system," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Lassance, Nathan & Vanderveken, Rodolphe & Vrins, Frédéric, 2022. "On the optimal combination of naive and mean-variance portfolio strategies," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2022006, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    6. Guillaume Coqueret, 2017. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02000726, HAL.
    7. Guillaume Coqueret, 2017. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02312186, HAL.
    8. Ruili Sun & Tiefeng Ma & Shuangzhe Liu & Milind Sathye, 2019. "Improved Covariance Matrix Estimation for Portfolio Risk Measurement: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, March.
    9. Coqueret, Guillaume, 2017. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 180-201.
    10. Oikonomou, Ioannis & Platanakis, Emmanouil & Sutcliffe, Charles, 2018. "Socially responsible investment portfolios: Does the optimization process matter?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 379-401.
    11. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Sandra Paterlini, 2020. "Developing new portfolio strategies by aggregation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 933-971, September.
    12. Tae-Hwy Lee & Ekaterina Seregina, 2020. "Optimal Portfolio Using Factor Graphical Lasso," Papers 2011.00435, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    13. Fernandez-Perez, Adrian & Fuertes, Ana-Maria & Miffre, Joëlle, 2019. "A comprehensive appraisal of style-integration methods," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 134-150.
    14. Ding, Wenliang & Shu, Lianjie & Gu, Xinhua, 2023. "A robust Glasso approach to portfolio selection in high dimensions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 22-37.
    15. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    16. Liusha Yang & Romain Couillet & Matthew R. McKay, 2015. "A Robust Statistics Approach to Minimum Variance Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1503.08013, arXiv.org.
    17. Yugo Fujimoto & Kei Nakagawa & Kentaro Imajo & Kentaro Minami, 2022. "Uncertainty Aware Trader-Company Method: Interpretable Stock Price Prediction Capturing Uncertainty," Papers 2210.17030, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    18. McDowell, Shaun, 2018. "An empirical evaluation of estimation error reduction strategies applied to international diversification," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-13.
    19. Kei Nakagawa & Yusuke Uchiyama, 2020. "GO-GJRSK Model with Application to Higher Order Risk-Based Portfolio," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Hongxin Zhao & Yilun Jiang & Yizhou Yang, 2023. "Robust and Sparse Portfolio: Optimization Models and Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2203.13740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.