IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1907.05037.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proportional Dynamics in Exchange Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Simina Br^anzei
  • Nikhil R. Devanur
  • Yuval Rabani

Abstract

We study the Proportional Response dynamic in exchange economies, where each player starts with some amount of money and a good. Every day, the players bring one unit of their good and submit bids on goods they like, each good gets allocated in proportion to the bid amounts, and each seller collects the bids received. Then every player updates the bids proportionally to the contribution of each good in their utility. This dynamic models a process of learning how to bid and has been studied in a series of papers on Fisher and production markets, but not in exchange economies. Our main results are as follows: - For linear utilities, the dynamic converges to market equilibrium utilities and allocations, while the bids and prices may cycle. We give a combinatorial characterization of limit cycles for prices and bids. - We introduce a lazy version of the dynamic, where players may save money for later, and show this converges in everything: utilities, allocations, and prices. - For CES utilities in the substitute range $[0,1)$, the dynamic converges for all parameters. This answers an open question about exchange economies with linear utilities, where tatonnement does not converge to market equilibria, and no natural process leading to equilibria was known. We also note that proportional response is a process where the players exchange goods throughout time (in out-of-equilibrium states), while tatonnement only explains how exchange happens in the limit.

Suggested Citation

  • Simina Br^anzei & Nikhil R. Devanur & Yuval Rabani, 2019. "Proportional Dynamics in Exchange Economies," Papers 1907.05037, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1907.05037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.05037
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William C. Brainard & Herbert E. Scarf, 2005. "How to Compute Equilibrium Prices in 1891," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 57-83, January.
    2. Daskalakis, Constantinos & Deckelbaum, Alan & Kim, Anthony, 2015. "Near-optimal no-regret algorithms for zero-sum games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 327-348.
    3. M. Florig, 2004. "Equilibrium Correspondence of Linear Exchange Economies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 97-109, January.
    4. Mertens, J. F., 2003. "The limit-price mechanism," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(5-6), pages 433-528, July.
    5. Gale, David, 1976. "The linear exchange model," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 205-209, July.
    6. Devanur, Nikhil R. & Garg, Jugal & Végh, László A., 2016. "A rational convex program for linear Arrow-Debreu markets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69224, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Scarf, Herbert E., 1993. "The computation of equilibrium prices: An exposition," Handbook of Mathematical Economics, in: K. J. Arrow & M.D. Intriligator (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, edition 4, volume 2, chapter 21, pages 1007-1061, Elsevier.
    8. David Gale, 1963. "A note on global instability of competitive equilibrium," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 81-87, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simina Br^anzei, 2019. "Tit-for-Tat Dynamics and Market Volatility," Papers 1911.03629, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devanur, Nikhil R. & Garg, Jugal & Végh, László A., 2016. "A rational convex program for linear Arrow-Debreu markets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69224, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Jean-Marc Bonnisseau & Michael Florig, 2003. "Existence and optimality of oligopoly equilibria in linear exchange economies," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 22(4), pages 727-741, November.
    3. J. M. Bonnisseau & M. Florig & A. Jofré, 2001. "Continuity and Uniqueness of Equilibria for Linear Exchange Economies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 237-263, May.
    4. M. Florig, 2004. "Equilibrium Correspondence of Linear Exchange Economies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 97-109, January.
    5. Konovalov, Alexander & Marakulin, Valeri, 2006. "Equilibria without the survival assumption," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 198-215, April.
    6. Konovalov, A. & Marakulin, V., 2001. "Equilibria Without the Survival Assumption : A Non-Standard Analysis Approach," Discussion Paper 2001-34, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    7. Florig, Michael & Rivera, Jorge, 2019. "Walrasian equilibrium as limit of competitive equilibria without divisible goods," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Konovalov, A. & Marakulin, V., 2002. "Generalized equilibrium in an economy without the survival assumption," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-49, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Florig, Michael, 2001. "Hierarchic competitive equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 515-546, July.
    10. K. Vela Velupillai & Stefano Zambelli, 2010. "Computation in Economics," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1001, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    11. Simina Br^anzei & Fedor Sandomirskiy, 2019. "Algorithms for Competitive Division of Chores," Papers 1907.01766, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    12. Dubey, Pradeep & Sondermann, Dieter, 2009. "Perfect competition in an oligopoly (including bilateral monopoly)," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 124-141, January.
    13. Bottazzi, Jean-Marc & De Meyer, Bernard, 2003. "A market game for assets and taxed investors," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(5-6), pages 657-675, July.
    14. Gaël Giraud & Céline Rochon, 2010. "Transition to Equilibrium in International Trades," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00657038, HAL.
    15. Gaël Giraud & Céline Rochon, 2007. "Natural rate of unemployment and efficiency: a dynamic analysis with flexible prices and increasing returns," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00155739, HAL.
    16. Michael Florig & Jorge Rivera Cayupi, 2015. "Walrasian equilibrium as limit of a competitive equilibrium without divisible goods," Working Papers wp404, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    17. Arnab Bhattacharjee & Sudipto Roy, 2019. "Abnormal Returns or Mismeasured Risk? Network Effects and Risk Spillover in Stock Returns," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Nikhil Garg & Ashish Goel & Benjamin Plaut, 2021. "Markets for public decision-making," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 755-801, May.
    19. Weyers, Sonia, 2003. "A strategic market game with limit prices," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(5-6), pages 529-558, July.
    20. Jean-Marc Bonnisseau & Michael Florig, 2005. "Non-existence of Duopoly Equilibria: A Simple Numerical Example," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 65-71, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1907.05037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.