IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1809.02362.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A proof that artificial neural networks overcome the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of Black-Scholes partial differential equations

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Grohs
  • Fabian Hornung
  • Arnulf Jentzen
  • Philippe von Wurstemberger

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have very successfully been used in numerical simulations for a series of computational problems ranging from image classification/image recognition, speech recognition, time series analysis, game intelligence, and computational advertising to numerical approximations of partial differential equations (PDEs). Such numerical simulations suggest that ANNs have the capacity to very efficiently approximate high-dimensional functions and, especially, indicate that ANNs seem to admit the fundamental power to overcome the curse of dimensionality when approximating the high-dimensional functions appearing in the above named computational problems. There are a series of rigorous mathematical approximation results for ANNs in the scientific literature. Some of them prove convergence without convergence rates and some even rigorously establish convergence rates but there are only a few special cases where mathematical results can rigorously explain the empirical success of ANNs when approximating high-dimensional functions. The key contribution of this article is to disclose that ANNs can efficiently approximate high-dimensional functions in the case of numerical approximations of Black-Scholes PDEs. More precisely, this work reveals that the number of required parameters of an ANN to approximate the solution of the Black-Scholes PDE grows at most polynomially in both the reciprocal of the prescribed approximation accuracy $\varepsilon > 0$ and the PDE dimension $d \in \mathbb{N}$. We thereby prove, for the first time, that ANNs do indeed overcome the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of Black-Scholes PDEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Grohs & Fabian Hornung & Arnulf Jentzen & Philippe von Wurstemberger, 2018. "A proof that artificial neural networks overcome the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of Black-Scholes partial differential equations," Papers 1809.02362, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1809.02362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.02362
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masaaki Fujii & Akihiko Takahashi & Masayuki Takahashi, 2017. "Asymptotic Expansion as Prior Knowledge in Deep Learning Method for high dimensional BSDEs," Papers 1710.07030, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    2. Masaaki Fujii & Akihiko Takahashi & Masayuki Takahashi, 2017. "Asymptotic Expansion as Prior Knowledge in Deep Learning Method for high dimensional BSDEs," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1069, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    3. David Silver & Aja Huang & Chris J. Maddison & Arthur Guez & Laurent Sifre & George van den Driessche & Julian Schrittwieser & Ioannis Antonoglou & Veda Panneershelvam & Marc Lanctot & Sander Dieleman, 2016. "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 484-489, January.
    4. Masaaki Fujii & Akihiko Takahashi & Masayuki Takahashi, 2017. "Asymptotic Expansion as Prior Knowledge in Deep Learning Method for high dimensional BSDEs," CARF F-Series CARF-F-423, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aurélien Alfonsi & Bernard Lapeyre & Jérôme Lelong, 2023. "How Many Inner Simulations to Compute Conditional Expectations with Least-square Monte Carlo?," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Marc Sabate-Vidales & David v{S}iv{s}ka & Lukasz Szpruch, 2020. "Solving path dependent PDEs with LSTM networks and path signatures," Papers 2011.10630, arXiv.org.
    3. Aurélien Alfonsi & Bernard Lapeyre & Jérôme Lelong, 2023. "How many inner simulations to compute conditional expectations with least-square Monte Carlo?," Post-Print hal-03770051, HAL.
    4. Lukas Gonon, 2022. "Deep neural network expressivity for optimal stopping problems," Papers 2210.10443, arXiv.org.
    5. Xiaofei Shi & Daran Xu & Zhanhao Zhang, 2021. "Deep Learning Algorithms for Hedging with Frictions," Papers 2111.01931, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    6. Marlon Azinovic & Luca Gaegauf & Simon Scheidegger, 2022. "Deep Equilibrium Nets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1471-1525, November.
    7. Stefan Kremsner & Alexander Steinicke & Michaela Szölgyenyi, 2020. "A Deep Neural Network Algorithm for Semilinear Elliptic PDEs with Applications in Insurance Mathematics," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Marc Sabate Vidales & David Siska & Lukasz Szpruch, 2018. "Unbiased deep solvers for linear parametric PDEs," Papers 1810.05094, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    9. Ashley Davey & Michael Monoyios & Harry Zheng, 2020. "Duality for optimal consumption with randomly terminating income," Papers 2011.00732, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    10. Philipp Grohs & Arnulf Jentzen & Diyora Salimova, 2022. "Deep neural network approximations for solutions of PDEs based on Monte Carlo algorithms," Partial Differential Equations and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1-41, August.
    11. Alfonsi, Aurélien & Cherchali, Adel & Infante Acevedo, Jose Arturo, 2021. "Multilevel Monte-Carlo for computing the SCR with the standard formula and other stress tests," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 234-260.
    12. Ashley Davey & Harry Zheng, 2022. "Deep Learning for Constrained Utility Maximisation," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 661-692, June.
    13. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Adel Cherchali & Jose Arturo Infante Acevedo, 2020. "Multilevel Monte-Carlo for computing the SCR with the standard formula and other stress tests," Papers 2010.12651, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    14. Glau, Kathrin & Wunderlich, Linus, 2022. "The deep parametric PDE method and applications to option pricing," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 432(C).
    15. Maximilien Germain & Huyên Pham & Xavier Warin, 2021. "Neural networks-based algorithms for stochastic control and PDEs in finance ," Post-Print hal-03115503, HAL.
    16. Nikolas Nüsken & Lorenz Richter, 2021. "Solving high-dimensional Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman PDEs using neural networks: perspectives from the theory of controlled diffusions and measures on path space," Partial Differential Equations and Applications, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-48, August.
    17. Ashley Davey & Harry Zheng, 2020. "Deep Learning for Constrained Utility Maximisation," Papers 2008.11757, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    18. Lukas Gonon & Christoph Schwab, 2021. "Deep ReLU Network Expression Rates for Option Prices in high-dimensional, exponential L\'evy models," Papers 2101.11897, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    19. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Bernard Lapeyre & J'er^ome Lelong, 2022. "How many inner simulations to compute conditional expectations with least-square Monte Carlo?," Papers 2209.04153, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    20. Jorino van Rhijn & Cornelis W. Oosterlee & Lech A. Grzelak & Shuaiqiang Liu, 2021. "Monte Carlo Simulation of SDEs using GANs," Papers 2104.01437, arXiv.org.
    21. Kathrin Glau & Linus Wunderlich, 2020. "The Deep Parametric PDE Method: Application to Option Pricing," Papers 2012.06211, arXiv.org.
    22. Stefan Kremsner & Alexander Steinicke & Michaela Szolgyenyi, 2020. "A deep neural network algorithm for semilinear elliptic PDEs with applications in insurance mathematics," Papers 2010.15757, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    23. Aurélien Alfonsi & Bernard Lapeyre & Jérôme Lelong, 2022. "How many inner simulations to compute conditional expectations with least-square Monte Carlo?," Working Papers hal-03770051, HAL.
    24. Lukas Gonon, 2021. "Random feature neural networks learn Black-Scholes type PDEs without curse of dimensionality," Papers 2106.08900, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masafumi Nakano & Akihiko Takahashi & Soichiro Takahashi, 2018. "Bitcoin technical trading with artificial neural network," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1078, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    2. Masafumi Nakano & Akihiko Takahashi & Soichiro Takahashi, 2018. "Bitcoin technical trading with artificial neural network," CARF F-Series CARF-F-430, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    3. Nakano, Masafumi & Takahashi, Akihiko & Takahashi, Soichiro, 2018. "Bitcoin technical trading with artificial neural network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 587-609.
    4. Martin Hutzenthaler & Arnulf Jentzen & Thomas Kruse & Tuan Anh Nguyen, 2020. "A proof that rectified deep neural networks overcome the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of semilinear heat equations," Partial Differential Equations and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-34, April.
    5. Masafumi Nakano & Akihiko Takahashi & Soichiro Takahashi, 2018. "Bitcoin Technical Trading with Articial Neural Network," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1090, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    6. Warin Xavier, 2018. "Nesting Monte Carlo for high-dimensional non-linear PDEs," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 24(4), pages 225-247, December.
    7. Andrew Na & Justin Wan, 2023. "Efficient Pricing and Hedging of High Dimensional American Options Using Recurrent Networks," Papers 2301.08232, arXiv.org.
    8. Yangang Chen & Justin W. L. Wan, 2019. "Deep Neural Network Framework Based on Backward Stochastic Differential Equations for Pricing and Hedging American Options in High Dimensions," Papers 1909.11532, arXiv.org.
    9. Tian Zhu & Merry H. Ma, 2022. "Deriving the Optimal Strategy for the Two Dice Pig Game via Reinforcement Learning," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio Execution in a Regime-switching Market with Non-linear Impact Costs: Combining Dynamic Program and Neural Network," Papers 2306.08809, arXiv.org.
    11. Pedro Afonso Fernandes, 2024. "Forecasting with Neuro-Dynamic Programming," Papers 2404.03737, arXiv.org.
    12. Nathan Companez & Aldeida Aleti, 2016. "Can Monte-Carlo Tree Search learn to sacrifice?," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 783-813, December.
    13. Yuchen Zhang & Wei Yang, 2022. "Breakthrough invention and problem complexity: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2510-2544, December.
    14. Yassine Chemingui & Adel Gastli & Omar Ellabban, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning-Based School Energy Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    16. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    17. JinHyo Joseph Yun & EuiSeob Jeong & Xiaofei Zhao & Sung Deuk Hahm & KyungHun Kim, 2019. "Collective Intelligence: An Emerging World in Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2019. "Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 216-237, March.
    19. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    20. Alessandro Gnoatto & Athena Picarelli & Christoph Reisinger, 2020. "Deep xVA solver -- A neural network based counterparty credit risk management framework," Papers 2005.02633, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1809.02362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.