IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1012.0249.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Robust Estimation of Operational Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Nataliya Horbenko
  • Peter Ruckdeschel
  • Taehan Bae

Abstract

According to the Loss Distribution Approach, the operational risk of a bank is determined as 99.9% quantile of the respective loss distribution, covering unexpected severe events. The 99.9% quantile can be considered a tail event. As supported by the Pickands-Balkema-de Haan Theorem, tail events exceeding some high threshold are usually modeled by a Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD). Estimation of GPD tail quantiles is not a trivial task, in particular if one takes into account the heavy tails of this distribution, the possibility of singular outliers, and, moreover, the fact that data is usually pooled among several sources. Moreover, if, as is frequently the case, operational losses are pooled anonymously, relevance of the fitting data for the respective bank is not self-evident. In such situations, robust methods may provide stable estimates when classical methods already fail. In this paper, optimally-robust procedures MBRE, OMSE, RMXE are introduced to the application domain of operational risk. We apply these procedures to parameter estimation of a GPD at data from Algorithmics Inc. To better understand these results, we provide supportive diagnostic plots adjusted for this context: influence plots, outlyingness plots, and QQ plots with robust confidence bands.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataliya Horbenko & Peter Ruckdeschel & Taehan Bae, 2010. "Robust Estimation of Operational Risk," Papers 1012.0249, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1012.0249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.0249
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:gam:jrisks:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:49-:d:111862 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1012.0249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.