IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/usdami/347311.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Farming Seagrasses and Seaweeds: Responsible Restoration & Revenue Generation

Author

Listed:
  • Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences
  • Interagency Working Group for Farming Seaweeds and Seagrasses
  • Editors:
  • Price, Nichole N.
  • Rexroad, Caird
  • Quigley, Charlotte
  • Stamieszkin, Karen
  • Langton, Richard
  • Sipler, Rachel

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: In 2019, the United States Congress charged the Secretary of Agriculture, in coordination with the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to establish a working group to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of U.S. seaweeds and seagrass farming, describing its current state, its potential to drive economic growth through production of livestock feeds and other commercial applications, and improve ocean health through deacidification. USDA partnered with Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences (BLOS), a global research institution located in East Boothbay, Maine, for assistance in collecting public input, providing subject matter expertise, and drafting a report to fulfill the Congressional mandate. In accordance with the fiscal year (FY) 2019 U.S. congressional appropriations bill, section 770, this document reports on (1) how kelp and seagrasses could help deacidify the oceans; (2) how emerging ocean farming practices could use seaweeds and seagrasses to provide a feedstock for agriculture and other commercial and industrial seaweeds and seagrasses that study (A) ocean deacidification; (B) the production of a feedstock for agriculture; and (C) how to develop scalable commercial applications to support a blue economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences & Interagency Working Group for Farming Seaweeds and Seagrasses & Editors: & Price, Nichole N. & Rexroad, Caird & Quigley, Charlotte & Stamieszkin, Karen & Langto, 2024. "Farming Seagrasses and Seaweeds: Responsible Restoration & Revenue Generation," USDA Miscellaneous 347311, United States Department of Agriculture.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:347311
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/347311/files/FarmingSeagrassSeaweed2024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.347311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos M. Duarte & Annette Bruhn & Dorte Krause-Jensen, 2022. "A seaweed aquaculture imperative to meet global sustainability targets," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 185-193, March.
    2. Maria del Rosario Uribe & Michael T. Coe & Andrea D. A. Castanho & Marcia N. Macedo & Denis Valle & Paulo M. Brando, 2023. "Net loss of biomass predicted for tropical biomes in a changing climate," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(3), pages 274-281, March.
    3. Michelle Dias Hornes da Rosa & Cristina Jansen Alves & Felipe Nardo dos Santos & Alexander Ossanes de Souza & Elessandra da Rosa Zavareze & Ernani Pinto & Miguel Daniel Noseda & Daniela Ramos & Cláudi, 2023. "Macroalgae and Microalgae Biomass as Feedstock for Products Applied to Bioenergy and Food Industry: A Brief Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Scott Spillias & Hugo Valin & Miroslav Batka & Frank Sperling & Petr Havlík & David Leclère & Richard S. Cottrell & Katherine R. O’Brien & Eve McDonald-Madden, 2023. "Reducing global land-use pressures with seaweed farming," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 380-390, April.
    5. Adam J. Liska & Haishun S. Yang & Virgil R. Bremer & Terry J. Klopfenstein & Daniel T. Walters & Galen E. Erickson & Kenneth G. Cassman, 2009. "Improvements in Life Cycle Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn‐Ethanol," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(1), pages 58-74, February.
    6. Mohr, Alison & Raman, Sujatha, 2013. "Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 114-122.
    7. Edward Hingha Foday Jr & Bai Bo & Xiaohui Xu, 2021. "Removal of Toxic Heavy Metals from Contaminated Aqueous Solutions Using Seaweeds: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Yining Chen & Lan Lan & Jing Zhang & Qiaohan Wang & Yan Liu & Huiru Li & Qingli Gong & Xu Gao, 2023. "Physiological Impacts of Nitrogen Starvation and Subsequent Recovery on the Red Seaweed Grateloupia turuturu (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Rachael Wade & Simona Augyte & Maddelyn Harden & Sergey Nuzhdin & Charles Yarish & Filipe Alberto, 2020. "Macroalgal germplasm banking for conservation, food security, and industry," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-10, February.
    10. ALBERTI Valentina & ALONSO RAPOSO Maria & ATTARDO Carmelo & AUTERI Davide & RIBEIRO BARRANCO Ricardo & BATISTA E SILVA Filipe & BENCZUR Peter & BERTOLDI Paolo & BONO Flavio & BUSSOLARI Ioris & LOURO C, 2019. "The Future of Cities: Opportunities, challenges and the way forward," JRC Research Reports JRC116711, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Oort, P.A.J. & Verhagen, A. & van der Werf, A.K., 2023. "Can seaweeds feed the world? Modelling world offshore seaweed production potential," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    2. Jingjing Wu & Shane W. Rogers & Rebekah Schaummann & Nichole N. Price, 2023. "A Comparison of Multiple Macroalgae Cultivation Systems and End-Use Strategies of Saccharina latissima and Gracilaria tikvahiae Based on Techno-Economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Wang, Qing & Sun, Xian & Lin, Senjie & Dong, Yahong & Shen, Hongtao & He, Zhili & Luo, Hongtian & Zou, Ligong & Chung, Ik Kyo & Yang, Yufeng, 2025. "Large-scale seaweed cultivation as a nature solution for carbon-negative economy and restorative environmental stewardship: Lessons from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Monteleone, Massimo & Cammerino, Anna Rita Bernadette & Libutti, Angela, 2018. "Agricultural “greening” and cropland diversification trends: Potential contribution of agroenergy crops in Capitanata (South Italy)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 591-600.
    6. Stefan Arens & Sunke Schlüters & Benedikt Hanke & Karsten von Maydell & Carsten Agert, 2020. "Sustainable Residential Energy Supply: A Literature Review-Based Morphological Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, January.
    7. repec:lic:licosd:37115 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Natalia Stefania Piotrowska & Stanisław Zbigniew Czachorowski & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2020. "Ground Beetles ( Carabidae ) in the Short-Rotation Coppice Willow and Poplar Plants—Synergistic Benefits System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Arcigni, Francesco & Friso, Riccardo & Collu, Maurizio & Venturini, Mauro, 2019. "Harmonized and systematic assessment of microalgae energy potential for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 614-624.
    10. Ribeiro, Barbara E. & Quintanilla, Miguel A., 2015. "Transitions in biofuel technologies: An appraisal of the social impacts of cellulosic ethanol using the Delphi method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 53-68.
    11. Gamborg, Christian & Anker, Helle Tegner & Sandøe, Peter, 2014. "Ethical and legal challenges in bioenergy governance: Coping with value disagreement and regulatory complexity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 326-333.
    12. Iyabo Adeola Olanrele & Adedoyin I. Lawal & Ezekiel Oseni & Ahmed Oluwatobi Adekunle & Bukola, B. Lawal-Adedoyin & Crystal O. Elleke & Racheal Ojeka-John & Henry Nweke-Love, 2020. "Accessing the Impacts of Contemporary Development in Biofuel on Agriculture, Energy and Domestic Economy: Evidence from Nigeria," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 469-478.
    13. Piroli, Giuseppe & Rajcaniova, Miroslava & Ciaian, Pavel & Kancs, d׳Artis, 2015. "From a rise in B to a fall in C? SVAR analysis of environmental impact of biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 921-930.
    14. Fedorova, Elena & Pongrácz, Eva, 2019. "Cumulative social effect assessment framework to evaluate the accumulation of social sustainability benefits of regional bioenergy value chains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1073-1088.
    15. Lorenzo Di Lucia & Barbara Ribeiro, 2018. "Enacting Responsibilities in Landscape Design: The Case of Advanced Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Huang, Jiangfeng & Khan, Muhammad Tahir & Perecin, Danilo & Coelho, Suani T. & Zhang, Muqing, 2020. "Sugarcane for bioethanol production: Potential of bagasse in Chinese perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Baral, Anil & Bakshi, Bhavik R., 2010. "Emergy analysis using US economic input–output models with applications to life cycles of gasoline and corn ethanol," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(15), pages 1807-1818.
    18. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of PLA Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Nicodème, Thibault & Berchem, Thomas & Jacquet, Nicolas & Richel, Aurore, 2018. "Thermochemical conversion of sugar industry by-products to biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 151-159.
    20. Piotr Gradziuk & Krzysztof Jończyk & Barbara Gradziuk & Adrianna Wojciechowska & Anna Trocewicz & Marcin Wysokiński, 2021. "An Economic Assessment of the Impact on Agriculture of the Proposed Changes in EU Biofuel Policy Mechanisms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    21. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:347311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.usda.gov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.