IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/usdami/337549.html

Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Federal Crop Insurance Cause of Loss Data: A Roadmap for Research and Outreach Efforts

Author

Listed:
  • Reyes, Julian
  • Williamson, Jeb
  • Elias, Emile

Abstract

Federal crop insurance provides a financial safety net for farmers against insured perils such as drought, heat, and freeze. In 2016 over $100 billion dollars of crops were insured through the Federal crop insurance program administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency. In this white paper, we analyze publicly-available Federal crop insurance data to understand how weather and climate-related perils, or causes of loss (COL), change over time and spatial areas. We find that over 75% of all weather/climate-related indemnities (i.e., crop losses) from 2001 to 2016 are due to three COL: drought, excess moisture, and hail. However, the extent to which these top COL and others impact indemnities is highly dependent on the time period, temporal scale, and spatial scale of analysis. Moreover, we identify what COL are region- or season-specific, and visualize COL trends over time. Finally, we offer a road map of research applications to quantify such trends in indemnities, as well as outreach and extension efforts that include an online data portal.

Suggested Citation

  • Reyes, Julian & Williamson, Jeb & Elias, Emile, 2018. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Federal Crop Insurance Cause of Loss Data: A Roadmap for Research and Outreach Efforts," USDA Miscellaneous 337549, United States Department of Agriculture.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:337549
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.337549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/337549/files/CropInsuranceLossData2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.337549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan A. Foley & Navin Ramankutty & Kate A. Brauman & Emily S. Cassidy & James S. Gerber & Matt Johnston & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Christine O’Connell & Deepak K. Ray & Paul C. West & Christian Balz, 2011. "Solutions for a cultivated planet," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7369), pages 337-342, October.
    2. W. Botzen & J. Bergh & L. Bouwer, 2010. "Climate change and increased risk for the insurance sector: a global perspective and an assessment for the Netherlands," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 52(3), pages 577-598, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reyes, Julian & Williamson, Jeb & Elias, Emile, 2018. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Federal Crop Insurance Cause of Loss Data: A Roadmap for Research and Outreach Efforts," USDA Miscellaneous 347664, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. Xiaocui Dong & Hongguang Liu, 2023. "Sustainable evaluation of agroecosystem in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China based on the Emergy Theory," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 13471-13494, November.
    3. Emily L. Pakhtigian & Subhrendu K. Pattanayak & Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo, 2024. "Forest Fires, Smoky Kitchens, and Human Health in Indonesia," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(8), pages 2115-2141, August.
    4. McCartney, Matthew P. & Whiting, L. & Makin, Ian & Lankford, B. A. & Ringler, C., 2019. "Rethinking irrigation modernisation: realising multiple objectives through the integration of fisheries," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 70(9):1201-.
    5. Siegmeier, Torsten & Möller, Detlev, 2013. "Mapping research at the intersection of organic farming and bioenergy — A scientometric review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 197-204.
    6. Dench, William E. & Morgan, Leanne K., 2021. "Unintended consequences to groundwater from improved irrigation efficiency: Lessons from the Hinds-Rangitata Plain, New Zealand," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    7. Pingarroni, Aline & Castro, Antonio J. & Gambi, Marcos & Bongers, Frans & Kolb, Melanie & García-Frapolli, Eduardo & Balvanera, Patricia, 2022. "Uncovering spatial patterns of ecosystem services and biodiversity through local communities' preferences and perceptions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    8. Anton Strokov & Ekatherine Yakubovich & Pavel Krasilnikov, 2017. "Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change: Evidence from Karelia," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 422-433.
    9. Clay, Nathan & King, Brian, 2019. "Smallholders’ uneven capacities to adapt to climate change amid Africa’s ‘green revolution’: Case study of Rwanda’s crop intensification program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Krishna Bahadur KC & Iftekharul Haque & Alexander F. Legwegoh & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2016. "Strategies to Reduce Food Loss in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, June.
    11. Zhong, Chao & Du, Jiaxin & Cai, Hongbo & Fan, Qi, 2025. "Does China's overseas agricultural aids contribute to global food security?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Nathan Pelletier & Maurice Doyon & Bruce Muirhead & Tina Widowski & Jodey Nurse-Gupta & Michelle Hunniford, 2018. "Sustainability in the Canadian Egg Industry—Learning from the Past, Navigating the Present, Planning for the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Wilhelm, Jennifer A. & Smith, Richard G. & Jolejole-Foreman, Maria Christina & Hurley, Stephanie, 2020. "Resident and stakeholder perceptions of ecosystem services associated with agricultural landscapes in New Hampshire," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    14. Kuisma, Miia & Kahiluoto, Helena, 2017. "Biotic resource loss beyond food waste: Agriculture leaks worst," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 129-140.
    15. Marco Letta & Pierluigi Montalbano & Richard S.J. Tol, 2017. "Temperature shocks, growth and poverty thresholds: evidence from rural Tanzania," Working Papers 13/17, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    16. Vera Samarina & Tatiana Skufina & ?lexander Samarin & Denis Ushakov, 2018. "Alternative energy sources: opportunities, experience and prospects of the Russian regions in the context of global trends," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 140-147.
    17. S. Surminski & J. Aerts & W. Botzen & P. Hudson & J. Mysiak & C. Pérez-Blanco, 2015. "Reflections on the current debate on how to link flood insurance and disaster risk reduction in the European Union," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1451-1479, December.
    18. Bryngelsson, David K. & Lindgren, Kristian, 2013. "Why large-scale bioenergy production on marginal land is unfeasible: A conceptual partial equilibrium analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 454-466.
    19. Aparna Gupta & Abena Owusu & Jue Wang, 2024. "Assessing U.S. insurance firms' climate change impact and response," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 49(3), pages 571-604, July.
    20. Rommel, Jens & Anggraini, Eva, 2018. "Spatially explicit framed field experiments on ecosystem services governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 201-205.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:337549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.usda.gov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.