IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uidaer/140530.html

The Economic Impact Of Technological Change On U.S. Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Araji, A.A.
  • White, Fred C.

Abstract

Several quantitative methods have been developed to evaluate the Impacts of technological change on U.S. agriculture. The major weakness of prevailing models is that they consider the impact of technology on supply alone and are based on partial equilibrium analysis in one market. The use of partial equilibrium analysis ignores cross-market effect. For most goods, a supply shift directly affects quantity demanded by reducing the price of the commodity along a given demand curve. The resulting change in the equilibrium price may affect demand for substitute and complimentary goods, which in turn affect demand for the commodity being considered. The primary objective of this paper is to analyze price effects and substitution effects of technological change in interrelated markets. An econometric model was developed and applied to the beef and pork industries to measure the social impacts of technological change. The multimarket supply-demand model developed in this paper includes technology variables in the specification of supply functions and the model explicitly accounts for the fact that technological change in one market influences demand for related products This paper evaluates the welfare impact of technological change through the consumer-producer surplus model that incorporates the interaction of demand relationships for beef and pork. The results indicate that total returns for technological change in beef and pork are high. Technological change in beef affects economic surpluses in the pork market and technological change in pork affects economic surpluses in the beef market. The actual allocation of expenditures for technological development over the study period (1960-1988) was 70% for beef and 30% for pork. However, the optimal allocation would have been a 40-60 split between beef and pork.

Suggested Citation

  • Araji, A.A. & White, Fred C., 1991. "The Economic Impact Of Technological Change On U.S. Agriculture," A.E. Research Series 140530, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uidaer:140530
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.140530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/140530/files/ui-91-9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.140530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zvi Griliches, 1958. "Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(5), pages 419-419.
    2. Glenn Fox, 1985. "Is the United States Really Underinvesting in Agricultural Research?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 806-812.
    3. Enrique R. Arzac & Maurice Wilkinson, 1979. "A Quarterly Econometric Model of United States Livestock and Feed Grain Markets and Some of Its Policy Implications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(2), pages 297-308.
    4. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    5. Jurg Bieri & Alain De Janvry & Schmitz Andrew, 1972. "Agricultural Technology and the Distribution of Welfare Gains," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(5), pages 801-808.
    6. Richard A. King, 1979. "Choices and Consequences," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(5), pages 839-848.
    7. E. Pasour & Marc Johnson, 1982. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research revisited," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 301-317, January.
    8. George, P.S. & King, Gordon A., 1971. "Consumer Demand for Food Commodities in the United States with Projections for 1980," Monographs, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation, number 11936.
    9. Diewert, W. E., 1976. "Exact and superlative index numbers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 115-145, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Araji, A. A. & White, F. C., 1991. "The Economic Impact Of Technological Change On U.S. Agriculture," A.E. Research Series 305084, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    2. Roseboom, Johannes, 2002. "A New Perspective On Underinvestment In Agricultural R&D," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19648, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Fox, Glenn, 1985. "Social Rates Of Return To Public Investment In Agricultural Research And The Underinvestment Hypothesis: An Agnostic View," Staff Papers 14054, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Technical Change and Productivity Growth in the U.K. Agricultural Sector," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232790, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    5. Cornell, Laurence D. & Sorenson, Vernon L., 1986. "Implications of Structural Change in U.S. Demand for Meat on U.S. Livestock and Grain Markets," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201355, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    6. Gardner, Bruce L., 1997. "Returns to Policy-Related Social Science Research in Agriculture," Working Papers 197845, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    7. Lyon, Charles C. & Thompson, Gary D., 1991. "Model Selection With Temporal And Spatial Aggregation: Alternative Marketing Margin Models," Staff Papers 13253, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Fuglie, Keith & Ballenger, Nicole & Rubenstein, Kelly Day & Klotz, Cassandra & Ollinger, Michael & Reilly, John & Vasavada, Utpal & Yee, Jet, "undated". "Agricultural Research and Development: Public and Private Investments Under Alternative Markets and Institutions," Agricultural Economic Reports 262031, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Lamm, R. McFall Jr., 1980. "Effects of Government Policy on Agriculture: An Empirical Analysis," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 329209, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Thirtle, C. & Bottomley, P., 1988. "Explaining Total Factor Productivity Change: Returns to R & D in U.K. Agricultural Research," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232809, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    11. Blisard, Noel & Blayney, Donald P. & Chandran, Ram & Allshouse, Jane E., 1999. "Analyses of Generic Dairy Advertising, 1984-97," Technical Bulletins 33554, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M. & Ruttan, Vernon W., 2010. "The Economics of Innovation and Technical Change in Agriculture," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 939-984, Elsevier.
    13. Fertő, Imre, 1996. "A mezőgazdaság a piacgazdaságban [Agriculture in a market economy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 114-127.
    14. Alston, Julian M. & Marra, Michele C. & Pardey, Philip G. & Wyatt, T.J., 2000. "Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(2), pages 1-31.
    15. Vernon Ruttan, 1982. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research revisited — A rejoinder," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 319-329, January.
    16. Blaylock, James R. & Blisard, William N., 1990. "Effects of Advertising on the Demand for Cheese, January 1982-June 1989," Staff Reports 278346, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Cooke, Stephen C. & Sundquist, W. Burt, 1987. "Cost Structures, Productivities and the Distribution of Technology Benefits Among Producers for Major U.S. Field Crops," Evaluating Agricultural Research and Productivity, Proceedings of a Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia, January 29-30, 1987, Miscellaneous Publication 52 50020, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    18. Seldon, Barry J., 1987. "Economic Evaluation of Forestry Research: Synthesis and Methodology," Evaluating Agricultural Research and Productivity, Proceedings of a Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia, January 29-30, 1987, Miscellaneous Publication 52 50027, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    19. Eswaramoorthy, K., 1991. "U.S. livestock production and factor demand: a multiproduct dynamic dual approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000010523, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Thomas, Greg & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George L. & Oxley, Jamie & Gill, Ravinderpal & Junkins, Bruce, 2000. "An Economic Analysis Of The Return To Canadian Swine Research - 1974-1997," Working Papers 34113, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uidaer:140530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeuidus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.