IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Economic Impacts of Farm Program Payment Limits

Listed author(s):
  • Knutson, Ronald D.
  • Richardson, James W.
  • Smith, Edward G.
  • Rister, M. Edward
  • Grant, Warren R.
  • Lippke, Lawrence A.
  • Israelsen, Craig L.

The high levels of government payments to farmers resulting from the 1985 farm bill have once again led the Congress to examine the payment limit issue. Payment limits were initially established in 1970 and have since been revised several times. In this report, policy and farm management economists analyze the consequences of alternative payment limits on economic efficiency, economic viability of family-size farms, international competitiveness, and consumer food costs. Effective payment limits encourage reduced farm size and in the presence of economies of size, tend to increase production costs for program crops. The Agricultural and Food Policy Center is charged with evaluating economic impacts of policy alternatives -- not recommending, advocating, or opposing particular policies. The Center's orientation is toward Texas agriculture -- evaluating policy impacts on its producers and consumers. Farm prices and income, however, are determined in world markets that are influenced by national economic policy and farm programs. Texas impacts, therefore, must be evaluated in a much broader national and international market and policy context.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center in its series Working Papers with number 42717.

in new window

Date of creation: Feb 2002
Handle: RePEc:ags:tamfwp:42717
Contact details of provider: Postal:
450 Blocker Building, 2124 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2124

Phone: (979) 845-5913
Fax: (979) 845-3140
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Smith, Edward G. & Richardson, James W. & Knutson, Ronald D., 1985. "Impact Of Alternative Farm Programs On Different Size Cotton Farms In The Texas Southern High Plains: A Simulation Approach," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(02), December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:tamfwp:42717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.