IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saeasm/34856.html

The Impacts of GM Seed Technology on Cotton: Cost of Production in Mississippi, 1996 - 2005

Author

Listed:
  • Ibendahl, Gregory A.
  • Anderson, John D.
  • Thompson, W. Michael, II
  • Hudson, Darren

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) cotton varieties have changed many aspects of cotton production in the United States. The rapid adoption of GM cotton varieties in Mississippi has allowed producers to alter certain production practices because of added benefits gained from GM varieties. This study analyses some of the effects of certain changes in some of the most relevant components of cotton production on yield that stem from the adoption of GM varieties in Mississippi by comparing production functions from 1996 and 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibendahl, Gregory A. & Anderson, John D. & Thompson, W. Michael, II & Hudson, Darren, 2007. "The Impacts of GM Seed Technology on Cotton: Cost of Production in Mississippi, 1996 - 2005," 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama 34856, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:saeasm:34856
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.34856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/34856/files/sp07th01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.34856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morrison Paul, Catherine J. & Nehring, Richard F. & Banker, David E. & Breneman, Vincent E., 2001. "Productivity Growth, Technological Progress, and Technical Efficiency in the Heartland and Southern Cotton States:1996-1999," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20679, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G., 1999. "A Farm Level Perspective On Agrobiotechnology," Agricultural Outlook Forum 1999 32913, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    3. Ziv Bar-Shira & Israel Finkelshtain, 1999. "Simple Nonparametric Tests of Technological Change: Theory and Application to U.S. Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(4), pages 850-864.
    4. Banerjee, Swagata (Ban) & Martin, Steven W. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 2005. "Farm Profits from Stochastic and On-Farm Yields of Bt and Non-Bt Cotton in the Mississippi Delta," 2005 Annual Meeting, February 5-9, 2005, Little Rock, Arkansas 35653, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. repec:cup:jagaec:v:28:y:1996:i:01:p:57-66_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lin, William W. & Price, Gregory K. & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 2001. "Estimating Farm-Level Effects Of Adopting Biotechnology," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20484, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maud Roucan-Kane & Allan Gray, 2009. "The U.S. Seed Industustustry: An Exploration of Statistics Highlighting the Economic Cctivity of the U.S. Row Crop Seed Industry," Working Papers 09-08, Purdue University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, John D. & Thompson, W. Michael, II & Ibendahl, Gregory A. & Laughlin, David H., 2006. "The Effects of Changing Technology: The Impacts of a Changing Cost Structure on Land Tenure Arrangements in the Mississippi Delta, 1996 - 2004," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21178, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Natalia Aldaz & Joaquín A. Millán, 2003. "A Comparison of Agricultural Productivity in the European Union Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa03p223, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Parcell, Joseph L., 2002. "Emerging Ip Markets: The Tokyo Grain Exchange Non-Gmo Soybean Contract," Working Papers 26038, University of Missouri Columbia, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    4. Hennessy, David A. & Saak, Alexander E., 2002. "On The Demand For A State-Contingent, Cost-Saving Seed Trait," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18515, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    5. Joaquín Millán & Natalia Aldaz, 2004. "Efficiency and Technical Change in Intertemporal Intersectoral DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 7-23, January.
    6. Onyango, Benjamin M. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 2004. "Consumer Acceptance of Nutritionally Enhanced Genetically Modified Food: Relevance of Gene Transfer Technology," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Wossink, Ada & Denaux, Zulal S., 2006. "Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-3), pages 312-328, October.
    8. Aldaz, Natalia & Millan, Joaquin A., 2003. "Analisis Malmquist y DEA intertermporal de las agriculturas de la Union Europea," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 3(06), pages 1-20.
    9. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2001. "Uncertainties Of Estimating The Welfare Effects Of Agricultural Biotechnology In The European Union," Working Papers 31828, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    10. Parcell, Joseph L. & Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G., 2001. "The Response Of Corn Futures Markets To Agro-Biotechnology News," 2001 Annual Meeting, July 8-11, 2001, Logan, Utah 36124, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    11. Araji, A. A. & Guenthner, J., 2002. "Genetically Modified (Gm) Foods: Consumers' And Producers' Perceptions And The Economic - Environmental Benefits," A.E. Research Series 305032, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    12. Wesseler, Justus & Scatasta, Sara & Nillesen, Eleonora, 2007. "The maximum incremental social tolerable irreversible costs (MISTICs) and other benefits and costs of introducing transgenic maize in the EU-15," MPRA Paper 33229, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Mundlak, Yair, 1999. "Production and Supply (Revised)," Working Papers 232819, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Center for Agricultural Economic Research.
    14. McNew, Kevin & Smith, Vincent H., 2003. "Segregation of Grain Markets: Consequences for Price Behavior," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(01), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Shi, Guanming, 2006. "Intellectual Property Rights, Genetic Use Restriction Technologies (GURTs), and Strategic Behavior," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21434, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Shi, Guanming, 2004. "Bundling And Licensing Of Genes In Agricultural Biotechnology," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19913, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Aldaz, Natalia & Millán, Joaquín, 2002. "An Inter-Country Comparison of Agricultural Productivity with Intertemporal DEA," Efficiency Series Papers 2002/09, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    18. Banerjee, Swagata (Ban) & Martin, Steven W., 2006. "Certainty Equivalent Farm Returns from Bt and Non-Bt Cotton," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35383, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    19. Yacob Abrehe Zereyesus & Allen M. Featherstone & Michael R. Langemeier, 2021. "Are Kansas farms profit maximizers? A stochastic additive error approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(1), pages 37-50, January.
    20. Hennessy, David A. & Saak, Alexander E., 2003. "State-Contingent Demand for Herbicide-Tolerance Seed Trait," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(01), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saeasm:34856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.