IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/quedwp/274628.html

Bene ˇ Efit Charges for Firms and Households for Maintenance of The Legal System

Author

Listed:
  • Hartwick, John

Abstract

We present an aggregate four good model (consumption, in- vestment and two government goods) in which the current flows of one government good are in part pure public intermediate goods. The other public goods has "final" services for house- holds. We are interested in a benefit approach to charging for government services that includes government services flowing directly to firms. The legal system is our representative inter- mediate public good and benefit charges to firms should include part of the maintenance of the legal system.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartwick, John, 2013. "Bene ˇ Efit Charges for Firms and Households for Maintenance of The Legal System," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 274628, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274628
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274628/files/qed_wp_1305.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manning, Richard & Markusen, James R & McMillan, John, 1985. "Paying for Public Inputs," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 235-238, March.
    2. Sandmo, Agnar, 1972. "Optimality rules for the provision of collective factors of production," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 149-157, April.
    3. R. Manning & J. McMillan, 1979. "Public Intermediate Goods, Production Possibilities, and International Trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 243-257, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Hartwick, 2013. "Benefit Charges For Firms And Households For Maintenance Of The Legal System," Working Paper 1305, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    2. Robert Scherf & Matthew Weinzierl, 2020. "Understanding Different Approaches to Benefit‐Based Taxation," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 385-410, June.
    3. Akihiko Yanase & Makoto Tawada, 2012. "History‐Dependent Paths And Trade Gains In A Small Open Economy With A Public Intermediate Good," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 53(1), pages 303-314, February.
    4. Craig Brett & John A. Weymark, 2009. "Comparative Statics of Optimal Nonlinear Income Taxation in the Presence of a Publicly Provided Input," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0910, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    5. Grimaud, André, 2002. "Non Convexities, Imperfect Competition and Growth," IDEI Working Papers 150, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    6. Sajid Anwar, 1993. "International transmission of government spending on industries," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 287-301, September.
    7. Grimaud, Andre & Tournemaine, Frederic, 2007. "Why can an environmental policy tax promote growth through the channel of education?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 27-36, April.
    8. Makoto Tawada & Akihiko Yanase, 2021. "Production possibilities and trade in a one-primary factor economy with public infrastructure," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 169-189, February.
    9. Anwar, Sajid, 2001. "Government spending on public infrastructure, prices, production and international trade," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 19-31.
    10. Suga, Nobuhito & Tawada, Makoto & Yanase, Akihiko, 2025. "A sufficient condition for symmetry-breaking under policy-guided comparative advantage," Discussion paper series. A 382, Graduate School of Economics and Business Administration, Hokkaido University.
    11. Tirelli, Mario, 2006. "The evaluation of public investments under uncertainty," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 188-198, December.
    12. James B. Davies & Al Slivinski, 2005. "The Public Role in Provision of Scientific Information: An Economic Approach," University of Western Ontario, Economic Policy Research Institute Working Papers 20051, University of Western Ontario, Economic Policy Research Institute.
    13. Christian Ewerhart, 2015. "Contest success functions: the common-pool perspective," ECON - Working Papers 195, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    14. Richard H. Clarida & Ronald Findlay, 1991. "Endogenous Comparative Advantage, Government, and the Pattern of Trade," NBER Working Papers 3813, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Cadot, Olivier & Roller, Lars-Hendrik & Stephan, Andreas, 2006. "Contribution to productivity or pork barrel? The two faces of infrastructure investment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(6-7), pages 1133-1153, August.
    16. Diego Martinez-Lopez, 2004. "The optimal provision of public inputs in a second best scenario," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9.
    17. Gray, Elie & Grimaud, André, 2014. "The Lindahl equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models: Knowledge diffusion, social value of innovations and optimal R&D incentives," IDEI Working Papers 821, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    18. Tapiero, Charles S. & Kogan, Konstantin, 2008. "Sustainable infrastructure investment with labor-only production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 876-886, June.
    19. Mamuneas, Theofanis P. & Ishaq Nadiri, M., 1996. "Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 57-81, December.
    20. Makoto Tawada & Nobuhito Suga & Akihiko Yanase, 2022. "Government, trade and comparative advantage, revisited," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 1135-1165, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.