IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331015.html

Trade Policy, Factor Markets and Social Structures in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Kerkelä, Leena
  • Niemi, Janne

Abstract

Different reciprocal and non-reciprocal trade arrangements are under evaluation for African countries, including regional trade arrangements (SADC) and EU’s initiatives ("Everything but Arms", Cotonou agreement). In this paper we present simulations with GTAP5 database of these interacting trade policy shocks for SADC countries. A detailed regional disaggregation makes it possible to formulate case studies for a range of countries when adverse impacts are an outcome of symmetric shocks or asymmetric shocks produce different impacts for different countries. As an asymmetric shock we formulate the EBA initiative, which treats LDC countries more favorably compared to the GSP treatment. In this paper the main results are presented and the basis for deeper analysis on the transmission of trade policy to the capacity building level are laid out. In the ex-post analysis we assume that the description of economies in GTAP 5 database and model are a starting point for the analysis when country specific observations on imperfections in the market are necessary to get a picture of how the social structures are conditioned the outcome and how they are affected by the structural changes due to the trade policy reforms. Additionally, the GTAP database has been improved regarding preferential treatment imposed by e.g. GSP system and, for countries included in Lomé Convention, by European Union. For this purpose, we use tariff data obtained from the TRAINS database. The economy wide effects seem to be negative for many African economies in scenarios representing free trade area between EU and SADC and different changes in EU's protection policy. The pure free trade area between SADC countries turns out to generate negative welfare effects for some of the participating countries. Effects are mainly due to strong model specific terms of trade effects but resource allocation varies also between countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerkelä, Leena & Niemi, Janne, 2002. "Trade Policy, Factor Markets and Social Structures in Africa," Conference papers 331015, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331015/files/1360.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dixon, Peter B. & Parmenter, B.R., 1996. "Computable general equilibrium modelling for policy analysis and forecasting," Handbook of Computational Economics, in: H. M. Amman & D. A. Kendrick & J. Rust (ed.), Handbook of Computational Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 3-85, Elsevier.
    2. David P. Vincent & Peter B. Dixon & B.R. Parmenter & D.C. Sams, 1979. "The Short‐Term Effect Of Domestic Oil Price Increases On The Australian Economy With Special Reference To The Agricultural Sector," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 23(2), pages 79-101, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yih-chyi Chuang & Chun-yuan Lee, 2004. "Industry-specific human capital and the wage profile: Evidence from Taiwan," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 140(1), pages 110-124, March.
    2. Tien Duc Pham & Son Nghiem & Larry Dwyer, 2018. "The economic impacts of a changing visa fee for Chinese tourists to Australia," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(1), pages 109-126, February.
    3. Yang, Anton, 2021. "Structural Estimation of a Gravity Model of Trade with the Constant-Difference-of-Elasticities," Conference papers 333297, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Chang, Ching-Cheng & Lin, Kuo-Jung & Lin, Hsing-Chun & Liou, Ruey-Wan & Hsu, Sheng-Ming & Hsieh, De-Yan & Hsu, Shih-Hsun, 2016. "An Economy-wide Analysis of Trade Liberalization Impacts on Rural Household Income in Taiwan," Conference papers 330222, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Eduardo Amaral Haddad & Michael L. Lahr & Dina N. Elshahawany & Moisés Vassallo, 2016. "Regional analysis of domestic integration in Egypt: an interregional CGE approach," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 5(1), pages 1-33, December.
    6. Eduardo Haddad & Alexandre A. Porsse & Eduardo P. Ribeiro, 2006. "Modeling Interjurisdictional Tax Competition in a Federal System," ERSA conference papers ersa06p359, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Mario Larch & Yoto V. Yotov, 2016. "General Equilibrium Trade Policy Analysis with Structural Gravity," CESifo Working Paper Series 6020, CESifo.
    8. Larry Dwyer & Peter Forsyth & Ray Spurr, 2003. "Inter-Industry Effects of Tourism Growth: Implications for Destination Managers," Tourism Economics, , vol. 9(2), pages 117-132, June.
    9. Rumler, Fabio, 1999. "Computable general equilibrium modeling. Numerical simulations in a 2-country monetary general equilibrium model," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 65, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Adams, Philip D. & Dixon, Peter B., 1997. "Generating detailed commodity forecasts from a computable general equilibrium model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 223-236, June.
    11. Eduardo A. Haddad & Jaime Bonet-Mor�n & Gerson Javier P�rez-Valbuena, 2022. "Impacto regional de las regalías en Colombia," Documentos de Trabajo Sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 20125, Banco de la República, Economía Regional.
    12. Li, Ji Feng & Wang, Xin & Zhang, Ya Xiong & Kou, Qin, 2014. "The economic impact of carbon pricing with regulated electricity prices in China—An application of a computable general equilibrium approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 46-56.
    13. J. A. Giesecke & W. J. Burns & A. Barrett & E. Bayrak & A. Rose & P. Slovic & M. Suher, 2012. "Assessment of the Regional Economic Impacts of Catastrophic Events: CGE Analysis of Resource Loss and Behavioral Effects of an RDD Attack Scenario," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 583-600, April.
    14. Zawalińska, Katarzyna & Ciechomska, Anna & Jendrzejewski, Błażej, 2016. "Challenges for Modelling CAP 2014–2020 within CGE Model Framework," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(173).
    15. Fan Zhai, 2008. "Armington Meets Melitz: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model of Trade," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 23, pages 575-604.
    16. Bhattarai, Keshab, 2017. "Impacts of GST reforms on efficiency, growth and redistribution of income in India: A Dynamic CGE Analysis," MPRA Paper 92139, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. John Rust, 1996. "Dealing with the Complexity of Economic Calculations," Computational Economics 9610002, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Oct 1997.
    18. Jussila, Mira & Tamminen, Saara & Kinnunen, Jouko, 2012. "The estimation of LES demand elasticities for CGE models," Working Papers 39, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Anderson, Kym & Martin, Will & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2005. "Market and Welfare Implications of Doha Reform Scenarios," Conference papers 331428, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Geoff W. Edwards, 1987. "Agricultural Policy Debate: A Survey," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 63(2), pages 129-143, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.