IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ovdeia/295979.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quantifying Indigenous Knowledge: A Rapid Method For Assessing Crop Performance Without Field Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Villiers, Anne

Abstract

This paper describes the development and use of a methodology for quantifying indigenous technical knowledge. Matrix ranking is adapted and used in systematic interviews with experienced farmers to generate numerical data on crop performance. Data sets compiled from a number of interviews are then subjected to statistical analysis. This enables hypotheses to be tested and agronomic parameters to be quantified without field trials. The methodology was developed to complement on-farm and station research. It may also have potential as an alternative to field trials because it provides information that is directly relevant to the farm situation at afar lower cost than field trials. This is particularly true for perennial crops, as conventional trials for these may take many years to yield data. Though the methodology has only been tested in the field of agronomy, the concept may have wider applications in a number of other disciplines in which indigenous technical knowledge is important in the research and development process. The paper therefore comments on both the risks and the potential of using the methodology.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:ovdeia:295979
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.295979
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/295979/files/odi059.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.295979?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ovdeia:295979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.