IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaae/23639.html

Marketing Mechanisms In Gm Grains And Oilseeds

Author

Listed:
  • Maxwell, Brett J.
  • Wilson, William W.
  • Dahl, Bruce L.

Abstract

A number of challenges exist for genetically modified (GM) crop development at the production level. Contract strategies can resolve these challenges. Contracts can be designed to induce legal adoption of GM wheat by varying technology fees, violation detection, and penalties. The primary objective of this research is to analyze contracting strategies to determine terms to minimize technology agreement violation and to induce legal adoption of GM wheat. A simulation model of a crop budget for Hard Red Spring wheat was developed. Results illustrate that contracts can be designed to induce desired behavior. Technology fee, probability of detection, and the level of non-GM premium were the most notable factors influencing adoption decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxwell, Brett J. & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2004. "Marketing Mechanisms In Gm Grains And Oilseeds," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23639, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:23639
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23639/files/aer547.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.23639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kinwa-Muzinga, Annie & Mazzocco, Michael A., 2002. "Examining Price Paths Of A Portfolio Of Agro-Biotechnology Seeds: The Effects Of Competition And Farmers' Response," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19829, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. R.W. Fraser, 1991. "Price‐Support Effects On Ec Producers," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. repec:cup:jagaec:v:28:y:1996:i:02:p:247-262_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Dahl, Bruce L. & Wilson, William W. & Johnson, D. Demcey & Nganje, William E., 2001. "Valuation Of New Spring Wheat Varieties: Tradeoffs For Growers And End-Users (Summary)," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23590, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    5. Meyer, Jack, 1977. "Choice among distributions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 326-336, April.
    6. Jefferson, Kenrett Y. & Traxler, Greg, 2002. "The Economics Of Value Enhanced Crops: An Analysis Of Benefit Sharing In The U.S," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19619, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. repec:cup:jagaec:v:22:y:1990:i:02:p:49-55_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. McCarl, Bruce A., 1990. "Generalized Stochastic Dominance: An Empirical Examination," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(01), pages 1-7, December.
    9. Lukin, Vladimir & Epplin, Francis M., 1999. "Value Of Soil Test Information For Crop Production," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21586, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Meyer, Jack, 1977. "Second Degree Stochastic Dominance with Respect to a Function," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 18(2), pages 477-487, June.
    11. Dias, Weeratilake & Helmers, Glenn A. & Eghball, Bahman, 1999. "Economic And Environmental Risk Efficiency Analysis Of Land Application Of Cattle Feedlot Manure: Generalized Stochastic Dominance Analysis," 1999 Annual Meeting, July 11-14, 1999, Fargo, ND 35715, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    12. Giannakas, Konstantinos, 2001. "The Economics Of Intellectual Property Rights Under Imperfect Enforcement," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20584, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Qaim, Matin & de Janvry, Alain, 2002. "Bt Cotton In Argentina: Analyzing Adoption And Farmers' Willingness To Pay," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19710, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L. & Johnson, D. Demcey & Nganje, William E., 2001. "Valuation Of New Spring Wheat Varieties: Tradeoffs For Growers And End-Users," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23622, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    15. Kingwell, Ross S., 2000. "Incentive Design for Introducing Genetically Modified Crops," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123687, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Alexander, Corinne E. & Goodhue, Rachael E., 1999. "Production Systems Competition And The Pricing Of Innovations: An Application To Biotechnology And Seed Corn," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21646, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Harrison, R. Wes & Bobst, Barry W. & Benson, Fred J. & Meyer, Lee, 1996. "Analysis Of The Risk Management Properties Of Grazing Contracts Versus Futures And Option Contracts," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ritchie, John W. & Abawi, G. Yahya & Dutta, Sunil C. & Harris, Trevor R. & Bange, Michael, 2004. "Risk management strategies using seasonal climate forecasting in irrigated cotton production: a tale of stochastic dominance," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(01), pages 1-29.
    2. John W. Ritchie & G. Yahya Abawi & Sunil C. Dutta & Trevor R. Harris & Michael Bange, 2004. "Risk management strategies using seasonal climate forecasting in irrigated cotton production: a tale of stochastic dominance," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(1), pages 65-93, March.
    3. Parsch, Lucas D. & Loewer, Otto J., 1986. "Risk-Efficiency of Beef-Forage Rotational Grazing Under Weather Uncertainty," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278411, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Hardaker, J. Brian & Lien, Gudbrand D., 2003. "Stochastic Efficiency Analysis With Risk Aversion Bounds: A Simplified Approach," Working Papers 12954, University of New England, School of Economics.
    5. David J. Pannell, 1991. "Pests and pesticides, risk and risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 361-383, August.
    6. Larson, James A. & Roberts, Roland K. & Tyler, Donald D. & Duck, Bob N. & Slinsky, Stephen P., 1998. "Nitrogen-Fixing Winter Cover Crops and Production Risk: A Case Study for No-Tillage Corn," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 163-174, July.
    7. Torkamani, Javad, 2005. "Using a whole-farm modelling approach to assess prospective technologies under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 138-154, August.
    8. Christian Laudag'e & Felix-Benedikt Liebrich, 2025. "Meyer risk measures," Papers 2509.24747, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
    9. Drynan, Ross G., 1987. "Sufficient Conditions for Dominance of Simply Related Prospects," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(01), pages 1-12, April.
    10. Light, Bar & Perlroth, Andres, 2021. "The Family of Alpha,[a,b] Stochastic Orders: Risk vs. Expected Value," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Marshall, Graham R. & Jones, Randall E. & Wall, Lisa M., 1997. "Tactical Opportunities, Risk Attitude and Choice of Farming Strategy: an Application of the Distribution Method," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 41(4), pages 1-21.
    12. Li, Jingyuan & Wang, Jianli & Zhou, Lin, 2024. "Correlation aversion and bivariate stochastic dominance with respect to reference functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 157-174.
    13. Liqun Liu & Jack Meyer, 2021. "Stochastic superiority," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 225-246, June.
    14. McCarl, Bruce A., 1988. "Preference Among Risky Prospects Under Constant Risk Aversion," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Liu, Liqun & Meyer, Jack, 2025. "Almost stochastic dominance: Magnitude constraints on risk aversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 82-90.
    16. Johnson, C. Scott & Foster, Kenneth A., 1994. "Risk Preferences And Contracting In The U.S. Hog Industry," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Zheng, Buhong, 2000. "Minimum Distribution-Sensitivity, Poverty Aversion, and Poverty Orderings," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 116-137, November.
    18. Jock R. Anderson & William E. Griffiths, 1982. "Production Risk And Efficient Allocation Of Resources," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 26(3), pages 226-232, December.
    19. Wilson, Paul N. & Eidman, Vernon R., 1983. "An Empirical Test Of The Interval Approach For Estimating Risk Preferences," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Post, Thierry & Kopa, Miloš, 2013. "General linear formulations of stochastic dominance criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 321-332.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:23639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.