IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ksaesp/117991.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic Analysis of Carbon Sequestration for Wheat and Grain Sorghum Production in Kansas

Author

Listed:
  • Aller, Taryn D.
  • Williams, Jeffery R.
  • Nelson, Richard G.
  • Claassen, Mark M.
  • Rice, Charles W.

Abstract

This study examined the economic potential with and without carbon credit payments of two crop and tillage systems in South Central Kansas that could reduce carbon dioxide emissions and sequester carbon in the soil. Experiment station cropping practices, yield data, and soil carbon data for continuously cropped wheat and grain sorghum produced with conventional tillage and no-tillage from1986 to 1995 were used to determine soil carbon changes and to develop enterprise budgets to determine expected net returns for a typical dryland farm in South Central Kansas. No-till had lower net returns because of lower yields and higher overall costs. Both crops produced under no-till had higher annual soil C gains than under conventional tillage. Carbon credit payments may be critical to induce farm managers to use cropping practices, such as no-till, that sequester soil carbon. The carbon credit payments needed will be highly dependent on cropping system production costs, especially herbicide costs, which substitute for tillage as a means of weed control. The C values estimated in this study that would provide an incentive to adopt no-tillage range from $0 to $95.991ton/year, depending upon the assumption about herbicide costs. In addition, if producers were compensated for other environmental benefits associated with no-till, carbon credits could be reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Aller, Taryn D. & Williams, Jeffery R. & Nelson, Richard G. & Claassen, Mark M. & Rice, Charles W., 2001. "An Economic Analysis of Carbon Sequestration for Wheat and Grain Sorghum Production in Kansas," Staff Papers 117991, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ksaesp:117991
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.117991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117991/files/02-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.117991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paudel, Krishna P. & Lohr, Luanne, 2000. "Meeting The Kyoto Target Through Conservation Tillage And Its Implication For Natural Capital Maintenance, Production Efficiency, And Sustainability," Series Reports 23812, Auburn University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    2. McCarl, Bruce A. & Schneider, Uwe A., 1999. "Curbing Greenhouse Gases: Agriculture's Role," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-4.
    3. Langemeier, Larry N., 2000. "Kansas Farm Management Data Bank Documentation," Staff Papers 117996, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    4. Drennen, Thomas E. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1994. "Global Warming and Agriculture: The Basics," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-3.
    5. Smith, Elwin G. & Lerohl, Mel L. & Messele, Teklay & Janzen, H. Henry, 2000. "Soil Quality Attribute Time Paths: Optimal Levels And Values," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Williams, Jeffery R. & Nelson, Richard G. & Aller, Taryn D. & Claassen, Mark M. & Rice, Charles W., 2002. "Derived Carbon Credit Values For Carbon Sequestration: Do Co2 Emissions From Production Inputs Matter ?," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19798, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Brausmann, Alexandra & Bretschger, Lucas, 2018. "Economic development on a finite planet with stochastic soil degradation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-19.
    3. Singh, O.P. & Singh, H.P. & Badal, P.S. & Singh, Rakesh & Pandey, Divya, 2010. "Impact of Resource Conservation Technologies on Carbon Emission in Major Wheat Growing Regions of India," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 65(3), pages 1-14.
    4. Michelle Wander & Todd Nissen, 2004. "Value of Soil Organic Carbon in Agricultural Lands," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 417-431, October.
    5. Alice Issanchou & Karine Daniel & Pierre Dupraz & Carole Ropars-Collet, 2018. "Soil resource and the profitability and sustainability of farms: A soil quality investment model," Working Papers SMART 18-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    6. Hengā€Chi Lee & Bruce A. McCarl & Dhazn Gillig, 2005. "The Dynamic Competitiveness of U.S. Agricultural and Forest Carbon Sequestration," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 53(4), pages 343-357, December.
    7. Ekbom, Anders & Brown, Gardner M. & Sterner, Thomas, 2009. "Muddy Waters: Soil Erosion and Downstream Externalities," Working Papers in Economics 341, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    8. Janssen, Larry & Harer, Justin, 2010. "An Economic Analysis of No-Till Rotations and Effects on Carbon Sequestration and Long Term Sustainability of Agriculture," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61176, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Uwe Schneider & Bruce McCarl, 2003. "Economic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 24(4), pages 291-312, April.
    10. Hongli Feng & Jinhua Zhao & Catherine L. Kling, 2000. "Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 00-wp261, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    11. Delin, Huang, 2012. "Policy Implications and Mitigation Potential in China Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emission," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 124848, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Alice Issanchou, 2016. "Soil resource, at the core of competitiveness and sustainability issues in agriculture: an economic approach," Working Papers SMART 16-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    13. Antle, John M. & Capalbo, Susan Marie & Mooney, Sian & Elliott, Edward T. & Paustian, Keith H., 2000. "Economics Of Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration In The Northern Great Plains," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21879, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Dhazn Gillig & Bruce McCarl & Ronald Sands, 2004. "Integrating agricultural and forestry GHG mitigation response into general economy frameworks: Developing a family of response functions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 241-259, July.
    15. X. Liu & S.J. Herbert & A.M. Hashemi & X. Zhang & G. Ding, 2006. "Effects of agricultural management on soil organic matter and carbon transformation - a review," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(12), pages 531-543.
    16. Elbakidze, Levan & McCarl, Bruce A., 2007. "Sequestration offsets versus direct emission reductions: Consideration of environmental co-effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 564-571, January.
    17. Lucas Bretschger & Alexandra Vinogradova, 2016. "Preservation of Agricultural Soils with Endogenous Stochastic Degradation," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 16/232, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    18. Issanchou, Alice, 2016. "Soil resource, at the core of competitiveness and sustainability issues in agriculture: an economic approach," Working Papers 230002, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ksaesp:117991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daksuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.