IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iwmirr/329153.html

How agricultural research for development achieves developmental outcomes: learning lessons to inform One CGIAR science and technology policy research

Author

Listed:
  • Douthwaite, B.
  • Child, K.

Abstract

At the end of 2021, CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs) will be replaced by Initiatives housed within One CGIAR. This new modality is intended to achieve higher levels of impact at a faster rate and at reduced cost compared to the CRPs. As One CGIAR begins, there is a unique opportunity to reflect on what has worked in different contexts. In this paper, we provide findings that relate to One CGIAR’s overarching view of how it will achieve positive and measurable impacts, and for agricultural research for development (AR4D) more generally. Specifically, we draw from three related CRP evaluations to identify how different types of AR4D approaches have contributed to successful outcomes. In the final section of the paper, we present our conclusions and provide a list of recommendations for the science and technology policy of One CGIAR and possibly other integrated research for development programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Douthwaite, B. & Child, K., "undated". "How agricultural research for development achieves developmental outcomes: learning lessons to inform One CGIAR science and technology policy research," IWMI Research Reports 329153, International Water Management Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iwmirr:329153
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329153/files/H050909.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spielman, David J. & Ekboir, Javier & Davis, Kristin, 2009. "The art and science of innovation systems inquiry: Applications to Sub-Saharan African agriculture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 399-405.
    2. Shah, Tushaar & Scott, Christopher A. & Kishore, Avinash & Sharma, Abhishek, 2004. "Energy-irrigation nexus in South Asia: Improving groundwater conservation and power sector viability," IWMI Research Reports 44557, International Water Management Institute.
    3. repec:iwt:rerpts:h036593 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:iwt:bosers:h050909 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ludovic Temple & Vanessa Casadella, 2020. "Innovation policies and models in Africa: Systemic and structural challenges through capacity building [Politiques et modèles d'innovation en Afrique : enjeux systémiques et structurels par le renforcement des capacités]," Post-Print hal-03820716, HAL.
    3. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Golam Saleh Ahmed Salem & So Kazama & Shamsuddin Shahid & Nepal C. Dey, 2018. "Groundwater-dependent irrigation costs and benefits for adaptation to global change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 953-979, August.
    5. repec:iwt:conppr:h042693 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Amadu, Festus O. & McNamara, Paul E. & Davis, Kristin E., 2021. "Soil health and grain yield impacts of climate resilient agriculture projects: Evidence from southern Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Verburg, René W. & Verberne, Emma & Negro, Simona O., 2022. "Accelerating the transition towards sustainable agriculture: The case of organic dairy farming in the Netherlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Leclère, Margot & Gorissen, Lenn & Cuijpers, Yvonne & Colombo, Luca & Schoonhoven-Speijer, Mirjam & Rossing, Walter A.H., 2024. "Fostering action perspectives to support crop diversification: Lessons from 25 change-oriented case studies across Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    9. Ray, Sudatta, 2020. "Beyond Lights: The Changing Impact of Rural Electrification on Indian Agriculture," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304223, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Crow, Ben & Singh, Nirvikar, 2009. "The Management of International Rivers as Demands Grow and Supplies Tighten: India, China, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh," Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, Working Paper Series qt48n485pc, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz.
    11. Ivan S. Adolwa & Stefan Schwarze & Imogen Bellwood-Howard & Nikolaus Schareika & Andreas Buerkert, 2017. "A comparative analysis of agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in Kenya and Ghana: sustainable agricultural intensification in the rural–urban interface," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 453-472, June.
    12. M. Dinesh Kumar, 2016. "Distressed Elephants: Policy Initiatives for Sustainable Groundwater Management in India," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 5(1), pages 51-62, January.
    13. Sina Razzaghi Asl & Asif Rahman & Eric Tate & William Lehman & Oliver Wing, 2025. "Social vulnerability correlates of flood risk to crops and buildings," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(7), pages 8137-8158, April.
    14. Anett Kuntosch & Bettina König, 2018. "Linking system perspectives with user perspectives to identify adoption barriers to food security innovations for smallholder farmers – evidence from rural Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 881-896, August.
    15. Klerkx, Laurens & Aarts, Noelle & Leeuwis, Cees, 2010. "Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(6), pages 390-400, July.
    16. repec:iwt:bosers:h052518 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Lenouvel, Vincent & Montginoul, Marielle, 2010. "Groundwater Management Instruments in a Conjunctive Use System: Assessing the Impact on Farmers’ Income Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP)," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 59(3).
    18. Guy Faure & Aurélie Toillier & Sarah Audouin & Syndhia Mathe & Bernard Triomphe & Ludovic Temple, 2019. "Evaluación de los sistemas de innovación agropecuaria para el diseño de políticas públicas: una revisión de la literatura," Post-Print hal-05174349, HAL.
    19. Isaac, Marney E., 2012. "Agricultural information exchange and organizational ties: The effect of network topology on managing agrodiversity," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 9-15.
    20. Yang, Huan & Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2014. "Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 115-125.
    21. Kaur, S. & Pollitt, M. G., 2024. "Using rewards and penalties to incentivize energy and water saving behaviour in agriculture – Evidence from a choice experiment in Punjab," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2434, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    22. repec:iwt:bosers:h042161 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Ortiz, Oscar & Orrego, Ricardo & Pradel, Willy & Gildemacher, Peter & Castillo, Renee & Otiniano, Ronal & Gabriel, Julio & Vallejo, Juan & Torres, Omar & Woldegiorgis, Gemebredin & Damene, Belew & Kak, 2013. "Insights into potato innovation systems in Bolivia, Ethiopia, Peru and Uganda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 73-83.
    24. Sinyolo, Sikhulumile, 2020. "Technology adoption and household food security among rural households in South Africa: The role of improved maize varieties," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iwmirr:329153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwmiclk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.