IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/276024.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of Technical Innovations to Protect Resources: The Case of Plaice in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Salamon, P.
  • Angulo, L.

Abstract

The paper analyses effects in the European fish sector which might occur due to technological innovations (pulse trawling in the case plaice) introduced under a regime of output controls to protect fish resources using. A partial equilibrium model (AGMEMOD) which covers among other agri-food products also 8 different fish categories is applied to conduct model simulations for the EU countries and some additional neighbouring countries European countries and the Rest of the world. The paper concentrates on plaice because the categories comprises very few fish species which allows to implement fish quotas and well as technological innovation. Therefore, this technology should contribute with the biomass protection as well as it proclaimed to increase fisher’s profits. Hence, model results indicate production increases may occur due to slight bio mass growth or cost decline until quotas are reached. Hence, all production growth will affect future prices negatively as expected growth of use in European countries is lower than production growth. The implementation of the pulse will enhance the currently existing price pressure whereas the impacts will vary significantly across the different European countries, affected by the size of the margin and the share of energy cost in total cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Salamon, P. & Angulo, L., 2018. "Impact of Technical Innovations to Protect Resources: The Case of Plaice in the EU," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276024, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:276024
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276024/files/2103.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ignacio Perez Dominguez & Thomas Fellmann & Thomas Chatzopoulos & Simone Pieralli & Hans Jensen & Jesus Barreiro-Hurle & Fabio Micale, 2017. "EU commodity market development: Medium-term agricultural outlook. Proceedings of the October 2017 workshop," JRC Research Reports JRC109451, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Angulo, Laura & Salamon, Petra & Banse, Martin & Döring, Ralf & Keller, Matthias & Van Leeuwen, Myrna, 2017. "Future Developments in German Fish Market – Integration of Market Expert Knowledge into a Modelling System," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276895, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Branch, Trevor A. & Rutherford, Kate & Hilborn, Ray, 2006. "Replacing trip limits with individual transferable quotas: implications for discarding," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 281-292, May.
    4. Newell, Richard G. & Sanchirico, James N. & Kerr, Suzi, 2005. "Fishing quota markets," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 437-462, May.
    5. Hidemichi Fujii & Yoshitaka Sakakura & Atsushi Hagiwara & John Bostock & Kiyoshi Soyano & Yoshiki Matsushita, 2017. "Research and Development Strategy for Fishery Technology Innovation for Sustainable Fishery Resource Management in North-East Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. G. M.P. Swann, 2009. "The Economics of Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13211.
    7. PEREZ DOMINGUEZ Ignacio & GOMEZ BARBERO Manuel & FELLMANN Thomas & CHATZOPOULOS Thomas & JENSEN Hans & PHILIPPIDIS George, 2018. "EU commodity market development: Medium-term agricultural outlook," JRC Research Reports JRC113987, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Angulo, Laura & Salamon, Petra & Banse, Martin & Döring, Ralf & Keller, Matthias & Van Leeuwen, Myrna, 2018. "Future Developments in German Fish Market – Integration of Market Expert Knowledge into a Modelling System," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(1), January.
    9. Pinkerton, Evelyn & Edwards, Danielle N., 2009. "The elephant in the room: The hidden costs of leasing individual transferable fishing quotas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 707-713, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ropicki, Andrew & Larkin, Sherry, 2015. "Implied Discount Rates in the Gulf of Mexico Commercial Red Snapper IFQ Program," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205711, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Oostdijk, Maartje & Santos, Maria J. & Agnarsson, Sveinn & Woods, Pamela J., 2019. "Structure and evolution of cod quota market networks in Iceland over times of financial volatility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 279-290.
    3. Cooper, Rachel & Leiman, Anthony & Jarre, Astrid, 2014. "An analysis of the structural changes in the offshore demersal hake (Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus) trawl fishery in South Africa," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 270-279.
    4. Tévécia Ronzon & Robert M’Barek, 2018. "Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor the EU’s Bioeconomy in Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Angulo, Laura & Salamon, Petra & Banse, Martin & Döring, Ralf & Keller, Matthias & Van Leeuwen, Myrna, 2018. "Future Developments in German Fish Market – Integration of Market Expert Knowledge into a Modelling System," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(1), January.
    6. Péreau, J.-C. & Doyen, L. & Little, L.R. & Thébaud, O., 2012. "The triple bottom line: Meeting ecological, economic and social goals with individual transferable quotas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 419-434.
    7. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2014. "Has Medical Innovation Reduced Cancer Mortality?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 60(1), pages 135-177.
    8. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    9. Cowling, Marc & Ughetto, Elisa & Lee, Neil, 2018. "The innovation debt penalty: Cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 166-176.
    10. Alhassan Abdul-Wakeel Karakara & Evans Osabuohien, 2020. "ICT adoption, competition and innovation of informal firms in West Africa: a comparative study of Ghana and Nigeria," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 397-414, June.
    11. Bharat Diwakar & Gilad Sorek, 2016. "Dynamics of Human Capital Accumulation, IPR Policy, and Growth," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2016-11, Department of Economics, Auburn University.
    12. Dana Benešová & Miroslav Hušek, 2019. "Factors for efficient use of information and communication technologies influencing sustainable position of service enterprises in Slovakia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1182-1194, March.
    13. Marina Rybalka, 2015. "The innovative input mix. Assessing the importance of R&D and ICT investments for firm performance in manufacturing and services," Discussion Papers 801, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    14. ManYing Kang & Marcel Ausloos, 2017. "An Inverse Problem Study: Credit Risk Ratings as a Determinant of Corporate Governance and Capital Structure in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Xuebing Tang, 2012. "The Assessment on Environmental Value of Thermal Power in China," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 115-120, March.
    16. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    17. Galasso, Alberto & Schankerman, Mark, 2013. "Patents and Cumulative Innovation:Causal Evidence from the Courts," IIR Working Paper 13-16, Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    18. Jos� Lobo & Charlotta Mellander & Kevin Stolarick & Deborah Strumsky, 2014. "The Inventive, the Educated and the Creative: How Do They Affect Metropolitan Productivity?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 155-177, February.
    19. Laura Barbieri & Daniela Bragoli & Flavia Cortelezzi & Giovanni Marseguerra, 2015. "Public Support to Innovation Strategies," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1509, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    20. Chin Hee Hahn & Dionisius Narjoko & Heiwai Tang & Yifan Zhang & Tomohiko Inui & Keiko Ito & Keishi Shoji & Nguyen Dinh Chuc & Nguyen Ngoc Anh & Li Hai Anh & Nguyen Thi Phuong Mai & Sadayuki Takii & Di, 2011. "Dynamics of Firm Selection Process in Globalized Economies," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2011-RPR-03 edited by Chin Hee Hahn & Dionisius Narjoko, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; International Relations/Trade;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:276024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.