IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi24/364728.html

Nature sanctuary, agricultural production site or opportunities from innovative land use? How political actors frame the future use of German peatlands

Author

Listed:
  • Petrick, Cora
  • Nowak, Wiebke
  • Grethe, Harald

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Petrick, Cora & Nowak, Wiebke & Grethe, Harald, 2024. "Nature sanctuary, agricultural production site or opportunities from innovative land use? How political actors frame the future use of German peatlands," GEWISOLA 64th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 25–27, 2024 364728, GEWISOLA.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi24:364728
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364728/files/Petrick.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashlie Delshad & Leigh Raymond, 2013. "Media Framing and Public Attitudes Toward Biofuels," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 30(2), pages 190-210, March.
    2. Teresa Pinto-Correia & José Muñoz-Rojas & Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe & Egon Bjørnshave Noe, 2019. "Governance Discourses Reflecting Tensions in a Multifunctional Land Use System in Decay; Tradition Versus Modernity in the Portuguese Montado," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Coleman, William D. & Skogstad, Grace D. & Atkinson, Michael M., 1996. "Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks: Cumulative Change in Agriculture," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 273-301, September.
    4. Johanna Norris & Bettina Matzdorf & Rena Barghusen & Christoph Schulze & Bart van Gorcum, 2021. "Viewpoints on Cooperative Peatland Management: Expectations and Motives of Dutch Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Angelika Zimmermann & Nora Albers & Jasper O. Kenter, 2022. "Deliberating Our Frames: How Members of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives Use Shared Frames to Tackle Within-Frame Conflicts Over Sustainability Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 757-782, July.
    6. Eerika Albrecht, 2018. "Discursive Struggle and Agency—Updating the Finnish Peatland Conservation Network," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cora Petrick & Wiebke Nowack & Harald Grethe, 2025. "Climate protection or agricultural production site? How political actors frame the future use of German peatlands," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(4), pages 2759-2771, December.
    2. FOUILLEUX, Eve, 2015. "Jean-Claude Bureau, Sophie Thoyer, La politique agricole commune," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(4), November.
    3. Natalia V. TRUSOVA & Oleksandr S. PRYSTEMSKYI & Oksana V. HRYVKIVSKA & Alina Zh. SAKUN & Yurii Y. KYRYLOV, 2021. "Modeling Of System Factors Of Financial Security Of Agricultural Enterprises Of Ukraine," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 169-182, June.
    4. Shapiro, Matthew A., 2020. "Next-generation battery research and development: Non-politicized science at the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Lijuan Du & Li Xu & Yanping Li & Changshun Liu & Zhenhua Li & Jefferson S. Wong & Bo Lei, 2019. "China’s Agricultural Irrigation and Water Conservancy Projects: A Policy Synthesis and Discussion of Emerging Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Ève FOUILLEUX, 2015. "Jean-Claude Bureau, Sophie Thoyer, La politique agricole commune," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(4), pages 755-762.
    7. Tosun, Jale & Schaub, Simon, 2015. "To mobilize or not: political attention and the regulation of GMOs," GMCC-15: Seventh GMCC, November 17-20, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 211493, International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC).
    8. Goldfarb, Jillian L. & Kriner, Douglas L., 2021. "U.S. public support for biofuels tax credits: Cost frames, local fuel prices, and the moderating influence of partisanship," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Huber, Robert & Ammann, Sara & Bethwell, Claudia & Carlin, Caitriona & Fahrni, Viviane & Fürholz, Andrea & Karner, Katrin & Hussain, Raja Imran & Kindermann, Gesche & Suškevičs, Monika, 2025. "Human–AI framework reveals design levers for collective landscape stewardship in agriculture," SocArXiv pfhk5_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. Ilona Rac & Karmen Erjavec & Emil Erjavec, 2024. "Agriculture and environment: friends or foes? Conceptualising agri-environmental discourses under the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(1), pages 147-166, March.
    11. Alina Georgiana Manta & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Gabriela Badareu & Claudia Gherțescu & Cătălin Valentin Mihai Lăpădat, 2024. "Does Common Agricultural Policy Influence Regional Disparities and Environmental Sustainability in European Union Countries?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Danny Otto & Maria Pfeiffer & Mariana Madruga de Brito & Matthias Gross, 2022. "Fixed Amidst Change: 20 Years of Media Coverage on Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Tyllianakis, Emmanouil, 2024. "Assessing the Landscape Recovery Scheme in the UK: a Q methodology study in Yorkshire, UK," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 13(01), May.
    14. Jingdong Li & Weidong Liu & Zhouying Song, 2020. "Sustainability of the Adjustment Schemes in China’s Grain Price Support Policy—An Empirical Analysis Based on the Partial Equilibrium Model of Wheat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Marlee Tichenor & Sally E Merry & Sotiria Grek & Justyna Bandola-Gill, 2022. "Global public policy in a quantified world: Sustainable Development Goals as epistemic infrastructures [The ethics of a formula: Calculating a financial-humanitarian price for water]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(4), pages 431-444.
    16. Léa Sénégas, 2025. "Power struggles within regional policy networks to develop organic farming: the territorialisation of sectoral tensions," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 137-164, May.
    17. Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K. & Howe, Peter D. & Leiserowitz, Anthony, 2018. "The influence of extractive activities on public support for renewable energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 117-126.
    18. Robin Vanner & Martha Bicket, 2016. "The Role of Paradigm Analysis in the Development of Policies for a Resource Efficient Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    19. Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich & Sutherland, Lee-Ann, 2016. "Patterns of attention to renewable energy in the British farming press from 1980 to 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 959-973.
    20. Shapiro, Matthew A. & Bolsen, Toby, 2019. "Korean perceptions of transboundary air pollution and domestic coal development: Two framing experiments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 333-342.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi24:364728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.