IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eptddp/16089.html

Public-Private Partnerships In Agricultural Research: An Analysis Of Challenges Facing Industry And The Consultative Group On International Agricultural Research

Author

Listed:
  • Spielman, David J.
  • von Grebmer, Klaus

Abstract

Public-private partnerships offer potentially important opportunities for pro-poor agricultural research in developing countries. Yet in the international agricultural research community--and with regard to the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) itself--we see few examples of successful public-private partnerships, and fewer examples where such collaborations have contributed to food security, poverty reduction and economic growth. This study assesses the opportunities for, and challenges to, creating and sustaining public-private partnerships between the international agricultural research centers of the CGIAR and leading multinational, research-based agribusiness companies. The study hypothesizes that the willingness and ability of public agencies and private firms to enter into partnerships are constrained by fundamentally different incentive structures; by insufficient minimization of the costs and risks of collaboration; by an inability to overcome mutually negative perceptions; by limited use of creative organizational mechanisms that reduce competition over key assets and resources; and by insufficient access to information on successful partnership models. The study methodology is based on interviews and discussions with key stakeholders and a wide review of the literature on public-private partnership. Tentative findings suggest that while incentives and perceptions do differ between sectors, sufficient common space exists or can be created through incentive structuring to facilitate greater partnership. However, both public- and private-sector partners inadequately account for and minimize the costs and risks of partnership. Similarly, partners discount the need for brokers and third-party actors to manage research collaborations and reduce competition between sectors. Finally, partners are operating without sufficient information on existing partnership experiences, lessons, and models, potentially contributing to a persistent or widening gap between sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Spielman, David J. & von Grebmer, Klaus, 2004. "Public-Private Partnerships In Agricultural Research: An Analysis Of Challenges Facing Industry And The Consultative Group On International Agricultural Research," EPTD Discussion Papers 16089, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eptddp:16089
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16089/files/ep040113.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.16089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Dosi & Christopher Freeman & Richard Nelson & Gerarld Silverberg & Luc Soete (ed.), 1988. "Technical Change and Economic Theory," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1988.
    2. Pardey, Philip G. & Beintema, Nienke M., 2001. "Slow magic: agricultural R&D a century after Mendel," Food policy statements 36, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Adato, Michelle & Haddad, Lawrence James & Hazell, Peter B.R., 2003. "Impacts Of Agricultural Research On Poverty: Findings Of An Integrated Economic And Social Analysis," Discussion Paper Briefs 15943, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    5. Hartwich, Frank & Janssen, Willem & Tola, Jaime, 2003. "Public-Private Partnerships for Agroindustrial Research: Recommendations from an Expert Consultation," ISNAR Archive 310789, CGIAR > International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Eran Binenbaum & Philip G. Pardey & Brian D. Wright, 2001. "Public-Private Research Relationships: The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 748-753.
    7. Pardey, Philip G. & Beintema, Nienke M., 2001. "Slow Magic: Agricultural R&D A Century After Mendel," Miscellaneous Publications 15911, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Pardey, Philip G. & Beintema, Nienke M., 2001. "Slow Magic: Agricultural R&D A Century After Mendel," Food Policy Statements 16591, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Carl E. Pray, 2001. "Public-Private Sector Linkages in Research and Development: Biotechnology and the Seed Industry in Brazil, China and India," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 742-747.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pardey, Philip G. & Wright, Brian D. & Nottenburg, Carol & Binenbaum, Eran & Zambrano, Patricia, 2003. "Intellectual Property And Developing Countries: Freedom To Operate In Agricultural Biotechnology," Research at a Glance Briefs 16486, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Tokgoz, Simla, 2003. "R&D Spillovers In Agriculture: Results From A Trade Model," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18592, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    3. Shenggen Fan & Xiaobo Zhang, 2008. "Public Expenditure, Growth and Poverty Reduction in Rural Uganda," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 20(3), pages 466-496.
    4. Anwar Naseem & David J. Spielman & Steven Were Omamo, 2010. "Private-sector investment in R&D: a review of policy options to promote its growth in developing-country agriculture," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 143-173.
    5. Lois Muraguri, 2010. "Unplugged!: An analysis of agricultural biotechnology PPPs in Kenya," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 289-307.
    6. Marra, Michele C. & Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M., 2002. "The payoffs to agricultural biotechnology: an assessment of the evidence," EPTD discussion papers 87, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Ryan, James G., 2003. "Evaluating The Impact Of Agricultural Projection Modeling Using The "Impact" Framework," Impact Assessment Discussion Papers 16583, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Fan, Shenggen & Rao, Neetha, 2003. "Public Spending In Developing Coutries: Trends, Determination, And Impact," EPTD Discussion Papers 16080, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Spielman, David J., 2007. "Pro-poor agricultural biotechnology: Can the international research system deliver the goods?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 189-204, April.
    10. Hall, Andy, 2006. "Public private sector partnerships in an agricultural system of innovation: concepts and challenges," MERIT Working Papers 2006-002, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    11. Filippo Belloc, 2010. "The Dark Side of Shareholder Protection: Cross-country Evidence from Innovation Performance," Department of Economics University of Siena 583, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    12. Mogues, Tewodaj & Yu, Bingxin & Fan, Shenggen & McBride, Linden, "undated". "The impacts of public investment in and for agriculture: synthesis of the existing evidence," ESA Working Papers 288994, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    13. Irina A. Zaraychenko & Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Mikhail Y. Shvetsov & Klavdiya G. Erdyneyeva & Lidiya A. Bordonskaya & Aleksandra E. Persidskaya & Sofya A. Rozhkova & Aleksandr A. Afanasyev, 2016. "Innovation Networks Modeling Within the Concept of Open Innovations," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 192-198.
    14. Spielman, David J. & Hartwich, Frank & von Grebmer, Klaus, 2007. "Sharing Science, Building Bridges, and Enhancing Impact: Public–Private Partnerships in the CGIAR," IFPRI Discussion Papers 42405, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Hilbert, Martin R. & Katz, Jorge, 2003. "Building an information society: a Latin American and Caribbean perspective," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2743 edited by Eclac.
    16. Silva, Maria José & Leitão, João, 2007. "Cooperation in Innovation Practices among Portuguese Firms: Do Universities Interface Innovative Advances?," MPRA Paper 5215, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Carreira, Carlos & Teixeira, Paulino, 2011. "Entry and exit as a source of aggregate productivity growth in two alternative technological regimes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 135-150, June.
    19. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    20. Miguel Espinosa, 2021. "Labor Boundaries and Skills: The Case of Lobbyists," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1586-1607, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eptddp:16089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.