IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa126/126119.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Service provision and social cohesion in rural areas: interaction between commuting, mobility and the residential preferences in Latvia

Author

Listed:
  • Zobena, Aija
  • Lace, I.
  • Benga, Elita

Abstract

The main issue addressed in this study is interaction of development policy of agricultural and rural areas with the regional and cohesion policies. This paper is based on an empirical study of everyday commuting models and spatial practices of different social groups of rural people in Latvia. This article analyzes data from a survey “Place, capabilities, migration” conducted in 2011 with a total of 1009 respondents in Latvia. The theoretical basis of research is rooted in the mobility studies and sociological and geographical conceptualization of space and place. The main focus is on analysis of relationship between commuting, mobility and the placeattachment. What are the main reasons of rural population mobility and everyday commuting? What services and where rural people use? What should be done to make rural places more attractive for people as places of work and residence?

Suggested Citation

  • Zobena, Aija & Lace, I. & Benga, Elita, 2012. "Service provision and social cohesion in rural areas: interaction between commuting, mobility and the residential preferences in Latvia," 126th Seminar, June 27-29, 2012, Capri, Italy 126119, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa126:126119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/126119
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent Kaufmann & Manfred Max Bergman & Dominique Joye, 2004. "Motility: mobility as capital," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 745-756, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    rural and local development; social cohesion; commuting; mobility; Agricultural and Food Policy; Community/Rural/Urban Development; R58;

    JEL classification:

    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa126:126119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.