IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/baumwp/208707.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relative productive efficiency of different tenure classes in selected areas of Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Jabbar, M. A.

Abstract

Field data based evidence presented in this study suggested that for measuring relative efficiency of different groups of farms, tenurial classification was more appropriate than size classification on the basis of land or any other singly input category. It was found that different tenure classes achieved different levels of efficiency but owner-operators were the most efficient. That means, taken as a whole, the farms did not achieve optimum level of efficiency in using resources from the point of view of the society. Relative inefficiency of tenure classes involving sharecropping (part-operators, part-tenants and tenants) implies that the existing pattern of resource ownership and property relations are improper for attaining higher level of efficiency. Development policy implies government policy. Since objectives and methods of governments differ according to ideologies, specific policy actions could not be recommended on the basis of the findings of this study. However, the findings indicated that any government with a genuine desire to develop the agricultural sector should initiate an agrarian reform programme by correcting the present maldistribution of land, labour and capital resources and by reorganizing the government institutions serving agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Jabbar, M. A., 1977. "Relative productive efficiency of different tenure classes in selected areas of Bangladesh," Research Report/Working Paper 208707, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:baumwp:208707
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/208707/files/1977-Production%20Effeciency-BDS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.208707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bardhan, P K & Srinivasan, T N, 1971. "Cropsharing Tenancy in Agriculture: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 48-64, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bey, Brota S. & Singh, Ram & Gogoi, Jeemoni & Ahmed, Rizwan & Lapasam, Raplang & Buragohain, R. & Deka, Nivedita, 2022. "Resource Use in Sugarcane Cultivation under Tenant and Owner Farms of Assam: A Comparative Economic Analysis," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), June.
    2. Jabbar, M. A., 1978. "Conceptual issues related to classification of land tenure systems in Bangladesh," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 1(1).
    3. Jabbar, Mohammad A., 1985. "Animal power situation in Bangladesh," Research Report/Working Paper 183887, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dumas, Christelle, 2013. "Market Imperfections and Child Labor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 127-142.
    2. M. A. Taslim, 1992. "A Survey of Theories of Cropshare Tenancy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 68(3), pages 254-275, September.
    3. Subhasish Dugar & Haimanti Bhattacharya, 2019. "Can Concerns for Social Status Mitigate the ‘Lemons Problem’? Experimental Evidence from the Indian Caste Hierarchy," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 14(2), pages 151-179, August.
    4. Padhan, Sujit & Vijay, R., 2021. "Agrarian Relations and Agrarian Growth: An analysis of undivided state of Andhra Pradesh," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329406, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    5. Brandão, Antônio Salazar P. & Schuh, G. Edward, 1979. "Entrepreneurial Talent, Sharecropping, Resource Allocation And Land Ownership," Staff Papers 14009, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Herath Hmg., 1983. "Role of rural institutions in the diffusion of agricultural innovations in Sri Lanka," ILO Working Papers 992220103402676, International Labour Organization.
    7. Sen, Debapriya, 2011. "A theory of sharecropping: The role of price behavior and imperfect competition," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 181-199.
    8. M. A. Taslim, 1992. "Labour Market Dualism, Threat Of Eviction And Cropshare Tenancy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 43-55, January.
    9. Brooks A. Kaiser & James A. Roumasset, 2014. "Transitional Forces in a Resource Based Economy: Phases of Economic and Institutional Development in Hawaii," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 5(2).
    10. Nabi, Ijaz, 1983. "Contracts, Resource Use And Productivity In Sharecropping," Discussion Papers 272816, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    11. Debapriya Sen, 2005. "Sharecropping, interlinkage, and price variation," Department of Economics Working Papers 05-10, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
    12. Laha, A. & Kuri, P.K, 2008. "Productivity Differences under Alternative Tenurial Contracts in Agriculture and Access to Credit: Evidence from Rural West Bengal, India," Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), vol. 10, pages 1-18.
    13. Ghose, Ajit Kumar,, 1980. "Agrarian reform in West Bengal: objectives, achievements and limitations," ILO Working Papers 992032743402676, International Labour Organization.
    14. Jon Reiersen, 2001. "Bargaining and Efficiency in Sharecropping," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 1-15, May.
    15. J. G. Sutinen, 1975. "The Rational Choice of Share Leasing and Implications for Efficiency," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(4), pages 613-621.
    16. Roy, Jaideep & Serfes, Konstantinos, 2001. "Intertemporal discounting and tenurial contracts," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 417-436, April.
    17. Ray, Tridip, 1999. "Share tenancy as strategic delegation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 45-60, February.
    18. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Sullins, Martha, 1994. "Water markets in Pakistan: participation and productivity," EPTD discussion papers 4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. James, William E. & Roumasset, James A., 1979. "Explaining Variations In Share Contracts: Land Quality, Population Pressure And Technological Change," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 23(2), pages 1-12, August.
    20. Naziruddin Abdullah, 2000. "The Effects of Price-support Programme on Farm Tenancy Patterns and Farm Profitability: Some Evidence from Malaysia," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 51-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:baumwp:208707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/febaubd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.