IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404763.html

Rural Electrification, Agricultural Transformation, and Distributional Change

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Yifang

Abstract

Rural electrification is usually studied as a bridge to nonfarm employment and manufacturing growth. This paper studies a different and historically central margin: how the arrival of reliable rural power changes agricultural production, rural industrial activity, and the distribution of gains across places. I use China's Rural Primary Electrification Program as a staggered natural experiment. Counties entered certified cohorts in 1990, 1995, and 2000; the analysis combines a 1981-2015 county panel from the county-level agricultural database with climate, terrain, baseline economic conditions, and poverty-status controls. The empirical strategy is a twostage difference-in-differences estimator that residualizes outcomes with county fixed effects, year fixed effects, and province-year shocks before estimating treatment effects with countyclustered standard errors. Electrification increased agricultural machinery power by 11.9 percent, fertilizer use by 11.1 percent, effective irrigated area by 4.8 percent, total sown area by 6.4 percent, grain sown area by 7.8 percent, and agricultural labor by 9.5 percent. These input and scale margins translate into an 8.2 percent increase in grain output, a 7.9 percent increase in aggregate agricultural output value, and a 6.8 percent increase in agricultural income; rural industrial output value also rises by 10.8 percent. The estimates do not show robust effects on grain yield, plastic film use, cultivated land stock, aggregate farmer income, township-enterprise employment, or industrial income. Heterogeneity by baseline county income shows a progressive pattern: the lowest-income counties gain 22.4 percent in agricultural income, far more than richer counties. Event-study evidence supports the identifying assumption for major production and income outcomes and shows that the effects build gradually after certification. The results suggest that early electrification in poor agrarian settings is not merely an industrial policy. It is a general-purpose rural technology that relaxes production constraints, expands the cultivated margin, and can narrow spatial inequality when targeted toward lagging counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Yifang, 2026. "Rural Electrification, Agricultural Transformation, and Distributional Change," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404763, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404763
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404763/files/177682_194387_115232_Rural_Electrification_Agricultural_Transformation_and_Distributional_Change.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    2. Molly Lipscomb & A. Mushfiq Mobarak & Tania Barham, 2013. "Development Effects of Electrification: Evidence from the Topographic Placement of Hydropower Plants in Brazil," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 200-231, April.
    3. Hunt Allcott & Allan Collard-Wexler & Stephen D. O'Connell, 2016. "How Do Electricity Shortages Affect Industry? Evidence from India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(3), pages 587-624, March.
    4. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    5. Rud, Juan Pablo, 2012. "Electricity provision and industrial development: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 352-367.
    6. Taryn Dinkelman, 2011. "The Effects of Rural Electrification on Employment: New Evidence from South Africa," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3078-3108, December.
    7. Kenneth Lee & Edward Miguel & Catherine Wolfram, 2020. "Experimental Evidence on the Economics of Rural Electrification," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(4), pages 1523-1565.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ngawang Dendup, 2021. "Returns to Grid Electricity on Firewood Consumption and Mechanism," Working Papers 2109, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    2. Lai, Wangyang & Lin, Liguo & Shen, Xiaochi & Zhou, Maigeng, 2025. "Investing in a transition fuel: The remarkable decline in mortality from China's rollout of natural gas infrastructure," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    3. Khanna, Shefali & Rowe, Kevin, 2024. "The long-run value of electricity reliability in India," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Dendup, Ngawang, 2022. "Returns to grid electricity on firewood and kerosene: Mechanism," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Deutschmann, Joshua W. & Postepska, Agnieszka & Sarr, Leopold, 2021. "Measuring willingness to pay for reliable electricity: Evidence from Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Lin, Youhong & Xu, Chunhua, 2024. "Electrification and economic growth: Evidence from china's rural primary electrification program," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Meeks, Robyn C. & Omuraliev, Arstan & Isaev, Ruslan & Wang, Zhenxuan, 2023. "Impacts of electricity quality improvements: Experimental evidence on infrastructure investments," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Kassem, Dana, 2024. "Does electrification cause industrial development? Grid expansion and firm turnover in Indonesia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Chaurey, Ritam & Le, Duong Trung, 2022. "Infrastructure maintenance and rural economic activity: Evidence from India," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    10. David Boisclair & Roxane Borgès Da Silva & Nathalie De Marcellis-Warin & Pierre-Carl Michaud & Ingrid Peignier, 2022. "Combien de personnes ont développé des symptômes ou contracté la Covid-19 au Québec ? Une étude exploratoire," CIRANO Working Papers 2022s-05, CIRANO.
    11. Bo, Shiyu & Chen, Ting & Liu, Cong, 2022. "Trade shocks, industrial growth, and electrification in early 20th-century China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 732-749.
    12. Maria Vagliasindi & Nisan Gorgulu, 2025. "Disentangling the Key Economic Channels through Which Infrastructure Affects Jobs," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11096, The World Bank.
    13. Daniela Vidart, 2024. "Human Capital, Female Employment, and Electricity: Evidence from the Early 20th-Century United States," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(1), pages 560-594.
    14. Bensch, Gunther & Gotz, Gunnar & Peters, Jörg, 2020. "Effects of rural electrification on employment: A comment on Dinkelman (2011)," Ruhr Economic Papers 840, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. repec:osf:metaar:zhn9b_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Mario Liebensteiner & Johannes Paha, 2026. "Renewable Investment and Electricity Rationing: Evidence from South Africa," CESifo Working Paper Series 12540, CESifo.
    17. Fried, Stephie & Lagakos, David, 2021. "Rural electrification, migration and structural transformation: Evidence from Ethiopia," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Andrea Xamo & Roberto Ricciuti, 2025. "Electricity and the Geography of Industrial Development in a Latecomer Country: Preliminary Evidence on Italy, 1901-1911," Working Papers 01/2025, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    19. Abiodun, Kehinde & Gilbert, Ben, 2022. "Does universal electrification shield firms from productivity loss?," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    20. Ly, Alpha & Chakir, Raja & Creti, Anna, 2024. "Electrification or deforestation? Evidence from household practices in Côte d’Ivoire," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    21. Perez Sebastian,Fidel & Steinbuks,Jevgenijs & Feres,Jose Gustavo & Trotter,Ian Michael, 2020. "Electricity Access and Structural Transformation : Evidence from Brazil's Electrification," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9182, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.