IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/361114.html

The Effect of Mobile Banking Access on Bank Entry and Exit in the Southern Great Plains

Author

Listed:
  • Welch, Katie
  • Van Leuven, Andrew
  • Lambert, Dayton M.

Abstract

Bank or branch closure resulting in loss of access to lending institutions has been linked to limited economic growth and long-term vitality of a region (Nguyen, 2019; Conroy et al., 2017). Since the 1980’s, changes in banking, such as higher efficiency in branches, greater numbers of ATMs, and the emergence of alternative banking forms, coincided with declines in the total number of physical banks; by 1997, the total number of banking institutions had declined by 33% in the US and 40% in the Southern Great Plains (SGP) (Spong and Harvey, 1998). Following the advent of smart technology in the late 2000s, alternative banking options have become even more readily available with over half of all commercial banks in the United States offering online banking services by the end of 2003. In 2022, surveys found that 72% of banking Americans preferred to access their accounts through mobile or online portals (ABA, 2022). The availability and adoption of mobile technology begs the question, are brick-and-mortar bank entries and exits affected by technologies that increase mobile banking access? This study estimates the relationship between mobile banking access and bank entry and exit in the SGP, defined as the states of Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. These findings will lend insight to the question of whether there are areas without banking access or if the availability of mobile banking impacts physical bank presence.

Suggested Citation

  • Welch, Katie & Van Leuven, Andrew & Lambert, Dayton M., 2025. "The Effect of Mobile Banking Access on Bank Entry and Exit in the Southern Great Plains," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361114, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361114
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361114/files/75321_95253_105300_Mobile_Access_and_Banking.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.361114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Lars Peter & Heaton, John & Yaron, Amir, 1996. "Finite-Sample Properties of Some Alternative GMM Estimators," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 262-280, July.
    2. Hersh, Jonathan & Lang, Bree J. & Lang, Matthew, 2022. "Car accidents, smartphone adoption and 3G coverage," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 278-293.
    3. James Harvey & Kenneth Spong, 1998. "The changing structure of banking : a look at traditional and new ways of delivering banking services," Financial Industry Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue May, pages 1-16.
    4. Hernández-Murillo, Rubén & Llobet, Gerard & Fuentes, Roberto, 2010. "Strategic online banking adoption," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1650-1663, July.
    5. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    6. Hoai-Luu Q. Nguyen, 2019. "Are Credit Markets Still Local? Evidence from Bank Branch Closings," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, January.
    7. Valerien O. Pede, 2013. "Diversity And Regional Economic Growth: Evidence From Us Counties," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 38(3), pages 111-127, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Whitney K. Newey & Frank Windmeijer, 2005. "GMM with many weak moment conditions," CeMMAP working papers CWP18/05, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Maurice J. G. Bun & Frank Windmeijer, 2010. "The weak instrument problem of the system GMM estimator in dynamic panel data models," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 13(1), pages 95-126, February.
    3. Giorgio Calzolari & Laura Magazzini, 2014. "Improving GMM efficiency in dynamic models for panel data with mean stationarity," Working Papers 12/2014, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    4. Frank Kleibergen, 2004. "Expansions of GMM statistics that indicate their properties under weak and/or many instruments and the bootstrap," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 408, Econometric Society.
    5. Guilhem Bascle, 2008. "Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research," Post-Print hal-00576795, HAL.
    6. Nobel Prize Committee, 2013. "Understanding Asset Prices," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2013-1, Nobel Prize Committee.
    7. Hwang, Young Kyu & Venter, Alanda, 2025. "The impact of the digital economy and institutional quality in promoting low-carbon energy transition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    8. Donald, Stephen G. & Imbens, Guido W. & Newey, Whitney K., 2003. "Empirical likelihood estimation and consistent tests with conditional moment restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 55-93, November.
    9. Mihai Giurcanu & Brett Presnell, 2018. "Bootstrap inference for misspecified moment condition models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(3), pages 605-630, June.
    10. Fong, Tom Pak Wing & Sze, Angela Kin Wan & Ho, Edmund Ho Cheung, 2021. "Assessing cross-border interconnectedness between shadow banking systems," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. Alberto Posso, 2017. "Preferential trade agreements with labour provisions and child labour: evidence from Asia and the Pacific," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 24(2), pages 89-112, December.
    12. In Choi & Sanghyun Jung, 2021. "Cross-sectional quasi-maximum likelihood and bias-corrected pooled least squares estimators for short dynamic panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 177-203, January.
    13. Demian Pouzo, 2014. "Bootstrap Consistency for Quadratic Forms of Sample Averages with Increasing Dimension," Papers 1411.2701, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    14. E. Tsanana & X. Chapsa & C. Katrakilidis, 2016. "Is growth corrupted or bureaucratic? Panel evidence from the enlarged EU," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(33), pages 3131-3147, July.
    15. Tue Gørgens & Allan H. Würtz, 2019. "Threshold Regression with Endogeneity for Short Panels," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, May.
    16. Honore, Bo E. & Hu, Luojia, 2004. "Estimation of cross sectional and panel data censored regression models with endogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 293-316, October.
    17. Hayakawa, K. & Pesaran, M.H., 2012. "Robust Standard Errors in Transformed Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Panel Models," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1224, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    18. Richard A. Ashley & Xiaojin Sun, 2016. "Subset-Continuous-Updating GMM Estimators for Dynamic Panel Data Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, November.
    19. Inkmann, Joachim, 2000. "Finite Sample Properties of One-step, Two-step and Bootstrap Empirical Likelihood Approaches to Efficient GMM Estimation," CoFE Discussion Papers 00/03, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    20. Mamkhezri, Jamal, 2025. "Assessing price elasticity in US residential electricity consumption: A comparison of monthly and annual data with recession implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.