IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea24/343644.html

When Protection Becomes a Pitfall: Evaluating the Impact of Labor Policies on Women’s Workforce Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jiawen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jiawen, 2024. "When Protection Becomes a Pitfall: Evaluating the Impact of Labor Policies on Women’s Workforce Participation," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343644, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea24:343644
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343644/files/28169.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Berck & Sofia B. Villas-Boas, 2016. "A note on the triple difference in economic models," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 239-242, March.
    2. Elena Rey & Andreas Kyriacou & José I. Silva, 2021. "Maternity leave and female labor force participation: evidence from 159 countries," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 34(3), pages 803-824, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henri Bello Fika, 2024. "Gender Gap in the Paid Economic Activity and Economic Growth in the CEMAC Zone," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 2329-2349, July.
    2. Lebedinski, Lara & Liedl, Bernd & Skirbekk, Vegard & Steiber, Nadia & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2025. "Faith and the Child Penalty: Religious Affiliation and Gendered Earnings Losses After Childbirth," IHS Working Paper Series 59, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    3. José Ignacio Garcia-Pérez & Manuel Serrano-Alarcón & Judit Vall-Castelló, 2024. "Long-term unemployment subsidies and middle-aged disadvantaged workers’ health," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Lichtenberg Frank R, 2018. "The Impact of New Drug Launches on Longevity Growth in Nine Middle Eastern and African Countries, 2007–2015," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Martina Querejeta Rabosto & Estefanía Galván & Cecilia Parada & Soledad Salvador, 2021. "Gender Gaps and Family Policies in Latin America," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4509, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    6. Lee, Sung-Tae & Jung, Sun-Moon, 2024. "The interactive effect of maternity leaves and child care enrollment on maternal employment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 344-353.
    7. Annette Bergemann & Regina T. Riphahn, 2023. "Maternal employment effects of paid parental leave," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 139-178, January.
    8. Francesca Barigozzi & Helmuth Cremer & Emmanuel Thibault, 2024. "The motherhood wage and income traps," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(4), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Youjin Choi, 2023. "The likelihood and timing of mothers returning to work after parental leave," Economic and Social Reports 202300300002e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies and Modelling Branch.
    10. Bates, Lillian & Hall, Oliver & Jakiela, Pamela, 2023. "Understanding the Impacts of Paid Maternity Leave on Women's Labor Market Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 16565, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Carolin Linckh & Caroline Neuber-Pohl & Harald Pfeifer, 2023. "The employment effects of raising negotiated minimum wages for apprentices," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0202, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    12. Bediha Sahin, 2025. "Gender Knowledges, Cultures of Equality, and Structural Inequality: Interpreting Female Employment Patterns in Manufacturing Through Interpretable Machine Learning," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Del Rey, Elena & Racionero, Maria & Silva, Jose I., 2024. "Employer vs government parental leave: Labour market effects," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    14. Jorgen M. Harris & Eleonora Patacchini, 2024. "Closing the gender gap: promoting labour market participation," Chapters, in: Stéphane Carcillo & Stefano Scarpetta (ed.), Handbook on Labour Markets in Transition, chapter 24, pages 463-482, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Li, Jianqiang & Hu, Ailian & Chen, Wanyi & Fang, Shiyao, 2024. "Social security fee reduction, industrial robots, and labor income share," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Andreas Olden & Jarle Møen, 2022. "The triple difference estimator [Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 531-553.
    17. Gao, Shangyi & Cheong, Chee Seng & Zurbruegg, Ralf, 2024. "Do paid maternity leave mandates affect corporate cash holdings?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    18. Cintolesi, Andrea, 2022. "Political polarization and primary elections," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 596-617.
    19. Estefanía Galván & Cecilia Parada & Martina Querejeta & Soledad Salvador, 2024. "Gender Gaps and Family Leaves in Latin America," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 387-414, June.
    20. Leonardo M. Giuffrida & Gabriele Rovigatti, 2017. "Can the Private Sector Ensure the Public Interest? Evidence from Federal Procurement," CEIS Research Paper 411, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 20 Jul 2017.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea24:343644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.