How is Digital Evidence Used in the International Criminal Court? A Theoretical and Empirical Approach
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Obidzinski, Marie & Oytana, Yves, 2019.
"Identity errors and the standard of proof,"
International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 73-80.
- Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2019. "Identity errors and the standard of proof," Post-Print hal-04035094, HAL.
- Dominique Demougin & Claude Fluet, 2008.
"Rules of proof, courts, and incentives,"
RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(1), pages 20-40, March.
- Dominique Demougin & Claude Fluet, 2006. "Rules of Proof, Courts, and Incentives," Cahiers de recherche 0633, CIRPEE.
- Dominique Demougin & Claude Fluet, 2007. "Rules of Proof, Courts, and Incentives," CESifo Working Paper Series 2014, CESifo.
- Froeb, Luke M. & Kobayashi, Bruce H., 2001. "Evidence production in adversarial vs. inquisitorial regimes," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 267-272, February.
- Claude Fluet, 2009.
"Accuracy Versus Falsification Costs: The Optimal Amount of Evidence under Different Procedures,"
The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 134-156, May.
- Emons, Winand & Fluet, Claude, 2007. "Accuracy versus Falsification Costs: The Optimal Amount of Evidence under Different Procedures," CEPR Discussion Papers 6150, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Winand Emons & Claude Fluet, 2007. "Accuracy versus Falsification Costs: the Optimal Amount of Evidence under Different Procedures," Cahiers de recherche 0703, CIRPEE.
- Winand Emons & Claude Fluet, 2007. "Accuracy versus Falsification Costs: The optimal Amount of Evidence under different Procedures," Diskussionsschriften dp0702, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
- Murat C. Mungan, 2011. "A Utilitarian Justification for Heightened Standards of Proof in Criminal Trials," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 167(2), pages 352-370, June.
- Elliott Ash & Daniel L. Chen & Sergio Galletta, 2022.
"Measuring Judicial Sentiment: Methods and Application to US Circuit Courts,"
Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(354), pages 362-376, April.
- Elliott Ash & Daniel L. Chen & Sergio Galletta, 2022. "Measuring Judicial Sentiment: Methods and Application to US Circuit Courts," Post-Print hal-03597819, HAL.
- Matteo Rizzolli & Margherita Saraceno, 2013. "Better that ten guilty persons escape: punishment costs explain the standard of evidence," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 395-411, June.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Claude Fluet, 2020.
"L'économie de la preuve judiciaire,"
L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 96(4), pages 585-620.
- Claude Fluet, 2010. "L’économie de la preuve judiciaire," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 86(4), pages 451-486.
- Claude Denys Fluet, 2011. "L'économie de la preuve judiciaire," CIRANO Working Papers 2011s-18, CIRANO.
- Claude Fluet, 2011. "L'économie de la preuve judiciaire," Cahiers de recherche 1102, CIRPEE.
- Murat C Mungan & Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2023.
"Accuracy and Preferences for Legal Error,"
American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 190-227.
- Murat C Mungan & Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2020. "Accuracy and Preferences for Legal Error," Working Papers hal-04229266, HAL.
- Murat C. Mungan & Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2023. "Accuracy and Preferences for Legal Error," Working Papers AFED 23-03, Association Francaise d'Economie du Droit (AFED).
- Murat C Mungan & Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2023. "Accuracy and Preferences for Legal Error," Working Papers hal-04320337, HAL.
- Murat C. Mungan & Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2020. "Accuracy and Preferences for Legal Error," Working Papers 2020-09, CRESE.
- Chulyoung Kim, 2014. "Adversarial and Inquisitorial Procedures with Information Acquisition," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 767-803.
- Kim, Chulyoung, 2015. "Centralized vs. Decentralized Institutions for Expert Testimony," MPRA Paper 69618, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2020.
"Presumption of Innocence and Deterrence,"
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 176(2), pages 377-412.
- Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytanay, 2018. "Presumption of innocence and deterrence," TEPP Working Paper 2018-07, TEPP.
- Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2020. "Presumption of Innocence and Deterrence," Post-Print hal-04035073, HAL.
- Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2018. "Presumption of innocence and deterrence," Working Papers halshs-01879554, HAL.
- Winand Emons & Claude Fluet, 2020.
"Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Testimony,"
Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 71(3), pages 429-457.
- Emons, Winand & Fluet, Claude, 2009. "Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Testimony," CEPR Discussion Papers 7476, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Winand Emons & Claude Fluet, 2011. "Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Testimony," Cahiers de recherche 1122, CIRPEE.
- Winand Emons & Claude Fluet, 2009. "Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Testimony," Diskussionsschriften dp0904, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
- Alice Guerra & Maria Maraki & Baptiste Massenot & Christian Thöni, 2023. "Deterrence, settlement, and litigation under adversarial versus inquisitorial systems," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 331-356, September.
- Chulyoung Kim, 2017.
"An economic rationale for dismissing low-quality experts in trial,"
Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 64(5), pages 445-466, November.
- Kim, Chulyoung, 2015. "An Economic Rationale for Dismissing Low-Quality Experts in Trial," MPRA Paper 69620, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Chulyoung Kim & Paul S. Koh, 2020.
"Court‐appointed experts and accuracy in adversarial litigation,"
International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 16(3), pages 282-305, September.
- Chulyoung Kim & Paul S. Koh, 2018. "Court-Appointed Experts and Accuracy in Adversarial Litigation," Working papers 2018rwp-136, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
- Nakao Keisuke & Tsumagari Masatoshi, 2012. "The Inquisitor Judge's Trilemma," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 137-159, May.
- Winand Emons & Claude Fluet, 2019.
"Strategic communication with reporting costs,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(3), pages 341-363, October.
- Claude Fluet & Winand Emons, 2016. "Strategic Communication with Reporting Costs," Diskussionsschriften dp1601, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
- Winand Emons & Claude Denys Fluet, 2016. "Strategic Communication with Reporting Costs," CIRANO Working Papers 2016s-06, CIRANO.
- Emons, Winand & Fluet, Claude, 2016. "Strategic Communication with Reporting Costs," CEPR Discussion Papers 11105, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Mungan Murat C., 2018. "Mere Preparation," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, July.
- Obidzinski, Marie & Oytana, Yves, 2019.
"Identity errors and the standard of proof,"
International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 73-80.
- Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2019. "Identity errors and the standard of proof," Post-Print hal-04035094, HAL.
- Matteo Rizzolli, 2016. "Adjudication: Type-I and Type-II Errors," CERBE Working Papers wpC15, CERBE Center for Relationship Banking and Economics.
- Kim, Chulyoung, 2016.
"Adversarial bias, litigation, and the Daubert test: An economic approach,"
International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 67-75.
- Kim, Chulyoung, 2016. "Adversarial Bias, Litigation, and the Daubert Test: An Economic Approach," MPRA Paper 69978, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Yves Oytana & Marie Obidzinski, 2017.
"How does the probability of wrongful conviction affect the standard of proof?,"
Working Papers
2017-02, CRESE.
- Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2017. "How does the probability of wrongful conviction affect the standard of proof?," Working Papers hal-01462844, HAL.
- Luke M. Froeb & Bernhard Ganglmair & Steven Tschantz, 2016.
"Adversarial Decision Making: Choosing between Models Constructed by Interested Parties,"
Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(3), pages 527-548.
- Froeb, Luke M. & Ganglmair, Bernhard & Tschantz, Steven, 2016. "Adversarial decision-making: Choosing between models constructed by interested parties," MPRA Paper 71501, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Francesco Parisi & Ram Singh, 2024. "Decisiveness, Correctness and Accuracy in Criminal Adjudication," Working papers 350, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
- Mungan Murat C., 2020. "The Optimal Standard of Proof with Adjudication Avoidance," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-7, March.
- Mungan, Murat C., 2015. "Wrongful convictions and the punishment of attempts," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 79-87.
More about this item
Keywords
;JEL classification:
- K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-LAW-2025-07-14 (Law and Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afd:wpaper:2505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFED (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afeddea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.