IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afd/wpaper/2505.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How is Digital Evidence Used in the International Criminal Court? A Theoretical and Empirical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yann Lecorps

    (Université Paris Panthéon Assas, CRED, Paris, France)

  • Khaoula Naili

    (Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, CRESE (UR 3190), F-25000 Besançon, France)

  • Marie Obidzinski

    (Université Paris Panthéon Assas, CRED, Paris, France)

  • Yves Oytana

    (Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, CRESE (UR 3190), F-25000 Besançon, France)

  • Téa Toutounji

    (Université Paris Panthéon Assas, CRED, Paris, France)

Abstract

We examine the use of digital evidence in cases handled by the International Criminal Court (ICC) at different stages of the proceedings, both theoretically and empirically, and how the parties use it. Our theoretical findings indicate that the extent to which digital evidence is used versus classical evidence may increase or decrease with the stringency of the standard of proof. This variation depends on the cost of gathering evidence and the degree of complementarity between digital and classical evidence. Our main empirical findings are as follows: i) the intensity of references to classical evidence increases more than that of references to digital evidence between the pretrial and trial phases; ii) the prosecution appears to rely more on digital evidence than the defense; iii) there is a positive correlation between the emotional tone of the prosecution and the defense, but no correlation between their emotional tone and the reference to either types of evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Yann Lecorps & Khaoula Naili & Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana & Téa Toutounji, 2025. "How is Digital Evidence Used in the International Criminal Court? A Theoretical and Empirical Approach," Working Papers AFED 25-05, Association Francaise d'Economie du Droit (AFED).
  • Handle: RePEc:afd:wpaper:2505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://afed.ovh/RePEc/afd/wpaper/AFED-WP-25-05.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    K4;

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afd:wpaper:2505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFED (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afeddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.