IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/eschap/312784.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Mobilität und Korporatismus: Die Transformation der Automobilindustrie und ihre Akteure

In: Handbuch Mobilität und Gesellschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Schroeder, Wolfgang
  • Speidel, Frederic
  • Zindel, Jannik

Abstract

Die Automobilindustrie ist seit den 1950er-Jahren das Herzstück der deutschen Wirtschaft. Aufgrund ihrer sozio-ökonomischen und sozio-kulturellen Prägekraft gilt sie als deutsche Schlüsselindustrie und Konjunkturlokomotive. Soziokulturell hält sich die Vorstellung vom Auto als dem inszenierten Statussymbol mit kulturellen Flexibilitätsvorteilen, womit sich soziale Teilhabe sowie die Befriedigung von materiellen Lebensbedürfnissen realisieren lassen. Im Kontext der Klimakrise ist die Privilegierung des motorisierten Individualverkehrs (MIV) zunehmend in die Kritik geraten. Inwieweit es zu der vieldiskutierten Verkehrswende kommt, bestehend aus alternativen Mobilitätsformen, der Reduktion des Individualverkehrs, dem Aufbau kollektiver Infrastruktur und gemeinschaftlicher Fortbewegungsmittel, hängt nicht zuletzt an den Gestaltungs- aber auch Vetoabsichten der tripartistischen Akteursgruppen, Kapital, Arbeit und Staat, ab. Ob eine Neujustierung der Automobilwirtschaft durch kooperatives Handeln der genannten Akteursgruppen gelingen kann oder ob die bestehenden akteursbezogenen Handlungspräferenzen eine Wende verlangsamen, wenn nicht sogar scheitern lassen, ist das Thema des vorliegenden Beitrags.

Suggested Citation

  • Schroeder, Wolfgang & Speidel, Frederic & Zindel, Jannik, 2024. "Mobilität und Korporatismus: Die Transformation der Automobilindustrie und ihre Akteure," EconStor Open Access Book Chapters, in: Handbuch Mobilität und Gesellschaft, pages 1-16, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:eschap:312784
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-37804-2_22-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/312784/1/Full-text-chapter-Schroeder-et-al-Mobilit%c3%a4t-und-Korporatismus.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/978-3-658-37804-2_22-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schroeder, Wolfgang, 2021. "Von der Schließung zur Öffnung: Akteurskonstellationen in der Energie- und Verkehrswende," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 74(3), pages 199-206.
    2. Anne Binderkrantz, 2005. "Interest Group Strategies: Navigating Between Privileged Access and Strategies of Pressure," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53, pages 694-715, December.
    3. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1991. "Die Handlungsfähigkeit des Staates am Ende des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts," MPIfG Discussion Paper 91/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Anne Binderkrantz, 2005. "Interest Group Strategies: Navigating Between Privileged Access and Strategies of Pressure," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(4), pages 694-715, December.
    5. Doll, Claus & Krauss, Konstantin, 2022. "Nachhaltige Mobilität und innovative Geschäftsmodelle," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Colli & Johan Adriaensen, 2020. "Lobbying the state or the market? A framework to study civil society organizations’ strategic behavior," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 501-513, July.
    2. Paul Cairney & Federico Toth, 2023. "The politics of COVID-19 experts: comparing winners and losers in Italy and the UK," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(3), pages 392-405.
    3. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline & Thomas P. Lyon, 2016. "Merchants of Doubt: Corporate Political Influence when Expert Credibility is Uncertain," CESifo Working Paper Series 6165, CESifo.
    4. David Coen & Alexander Katsaitis, 2021. "Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 37-47.
    5. David Coen & Alexander Katsaitis, 2021. "Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 37-47.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:f6t5y_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Nicole Bolleyer, 2021. "Civil society – Politically engaged or member-serving? A governance perspective," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 495-520, September.
    8. Lasse F. Henriksen & Jacob Lunding & Christoph H. Ellersgaard & Anton G. Larsen, 2025. "The hardcore brokers: Core-periphery structure and political representation in Denmark's corporate elite network," Papers 2501.17209, arXiv.org.
    9. Peter Aagaard, 2022. "A Price to Pay? The Backsides of the Privileged Access to the Political System," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1157-1171, December.
    10. Nayara F. Macedo de Medeiros Albrecht, 2023. "Bureaucrats, interest groups and policymaking: a comprehensive overview from the turn of the century," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Coban, Mehmet Kerem, 2020. "Diffuse interest groups and regulatory policy change: Financial consumer protection in Turkey," OSF Preprints f6t5y, Center for Open Science.
    12. Danica Fink-Hafner & Sara Bauman, 2023. "Interest Group Strategic Responses to Democratic Backsliding," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 39-49.
    13. Glatz, Annika, 2013. "Interest Groups in International Intellectual Property Negotiations," Papers 928, World Trade Institute.
    14. Oliver Huwyler, 2020. "Interest groups in the European Union and their hiring of political consultancies," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(2), pages 333-354, June.
    15. Max Grömping & Darren R. Halpin, 2021. "Do think tanks generate media attention on issues they care about? Mediating internal expertise and prevailing governmental agendas," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 849-866, December.
    16. Danica Fink-Hafner & Sara Bauman, 2023. "Interest Group Strategic Responses to Democratic Backsliding," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 39-49.
    17. Naciye Bey, 2022. "Configurational analysis of environmental NGOs and their influence on environmental policy in Turkey," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. M. Kerem Coban, 2024. "Rethinking de facto autonomy? A multi‐policy area approach and the regulatory policy process," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(3), pages 508-530, May.
    19. Adam W Chalmers, 2013. "With a lot of help from their friends: Explaining the social logic of informational lobbying in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(4), pages 475-496, December.
    20. Keller, Eileen, 2015. "Forging a new Mittelstand compromise : lobbying strategies and business influence after the financial crisis," Economics Working Papers MWP2015/19, European University Institute.
    21. Azad Bali & Darren Halpin, 2021. "Agenda-setting instruments: means and strategies for the management of policy demands [Mayflies and old bulls: Organization persistence in state interest communities]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 333-344.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:eschap:312784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.