IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/arlaba/102941.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Planerische Instrumente in lokalen Kontexten: Einblicke in die Vielfalt von Planungskulturen

In: Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf

Author

Listed:
  • Levin-Keitel, Meike
  • Sondermann, Martin

Abstract

Inwieweit planerische Instrumente ein Hindernis oder einen Weg zum Ziel darstellen, hängt von den lokalen Kontexten ab, in denen sie entstanden sind bzw. angewendet werden. Obwohl der rechtliche Rahmen der räumlichen Planung in allen deutschen Städten prinzipiell gleich ist, werden die Handlungsspielräume und Planungsinstrumente - formelle wie informelle - ganz unterschiedlich genutzt. Dies führen wir auf die Existenz lokaler Planungskulturen zurück. Planungskulturen kennzeichnen sich unter anderem durch die spezifischen Wahrnehmungen, Werte und Bewertungen, Traditionen und Handlungen der Akteure vor Ort. Diese gestalten Instrumente und Verfahren auf bestimmte Art und Weise und unterscheiden sich damit von den Planungspraktiken in anderen räumlichen Kontexten. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, ein analytisches Verständnis von (lokalen) Planungskulturen und damit eine neue Perspektive auf die Theorie und Praxis räumlicher Planung zu aufzuzeigen.

Suggested Citation

  • Levin-Keitel, Meike & Sondermann, Martin, 2014. "Planerische Instrumente in lokalen Kontexten: Einblicke in die Vielfalt von Planungskulturen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 172-191, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arlaba:102941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/102941/1/ab_010_16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Reimer & Hans Blotevogel, 2012. "Comparing Spatial Planning Practice in Europe: A Plea for Cultural Sensitization," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 7-24.
    2. Vincent Nadin, 2012. "International Comparative Planning Methodology: Introduction to the Theme Issue," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-5.
    3. Huib Ernste, 2012. "Framing Cultures of Spatial Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 87-101.
    4. P Healey, 1996. "The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 23(2), pages 217-234, April.
    5. Frank Othengrafen & Mario Reimer, 2013. "The Embeddedness of Planning in Cultural Contexts: Theoretical Foundations for the Analysis of Dynamic Planning Cultures," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1269-1284, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristina Grange, 2014. "In Search of Radical Democracy: The Ideological Character of Current Political Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2670-2685, November.
    2. Mario Reimer, 2013. "Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Przemysław Śleszyński & Maciej Nowak & Paweł Sudra & Magdalena Załęczna & Małgorzata Blaszke, 2021. "Economic Consequences of Adopting Local Spatial Development Plans for the Spatial Management System: The Case of Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Nowak, Maciej J. & Lozynskyy, Roman M. & Pantyley, Viktoriya, 2021. "Local spatial policy in Ukraine and Poland," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, November.
    5. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.
    6. Efrat Eizenberg & Yosef Jabareen, 2017. "Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Quilling, Eike & Köckler, Heike, 2018. "Partizipation für eine gesundheitsfördernde Stadtentwicklung," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Baumgart, Sabine & Köckler, Heike & Ritzinger, Anne & Rüdiger, Andrea (ed.), Planung für gesundheitsfördernde Städte, volume 8, pages 101-117, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    8. Suškevičs, M. & Eiter, S. & Martinat, S. & Stober, D. & Vollmer, E. & de Boer, C.L. & Buchecker, M., 2019. "Regional variation in public acceptance of wind energy development in Europe: What are the roles of planning procedures and participation?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 311-323.
    9. Andy Inch, 2018. "‘Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1076-1092, April.
    10. Krekeler, Martin & Zimmermann, Thomas, 2014. "Politikwissenschaftliche Forschungsheuristiken als Hilfsmittel bei der Evaluation von raumbedeutsamen Instrumenten," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Küpper, Patrick & Levin-Keitel, Meike & Maus, Friederike & Müller, Peter & Reimann, Sara & Sonderman (ed.), Raumentwicklung 3.0 - Gemeinsam die Zukunft der räumlichen Planung gestalten, volume 8, pages 74-90, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    11. Dominic Stead & Jochem de Vries & Tuna Tasan-Kok, 2015. "Planning Cultures and Histories: Influences on the Evolution of Planning Systems and Spatial Development Patterns," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 2127-2132, November.
    12. Fernando Nogueira & Monique Borges & Jan-Hendrik Wolf, 2017. "Collaborative Decision-Making in Non-formal Planning Settings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 875-890, September.
    13. Lowry, Michael B., 2010. "Using optimization to program projects in the era of communicative rationality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 94-101, March.
    14. Mandy HM Lau, 2019. "Lobbying for rent regulation in Hong Kong: Rental market politics and framing strategies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2515-2531, September.
    15. Živanović, Zora & Tošić, Branka & Berisha, Erblin & Perić, Ana, 2023. "An attempt to locate the Russian spatial planning system within the European planning families," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Michael Lowry, 2010. "Online public deliberation for a regional transportation improvement decision," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 39-58, January.
    17. Paul Stangl, 2008. "Evaluating the pedestrian realm: instrumental rationality, communicative rationality and phenomenology," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(6), pages 759-775, November.
    18. Maciej Nowak & Giancarlo Cotella & Przemysław Śleszyński, 2021. "The Legal, Administrative, and Governance Frameworks of Spatial Policy, Planning, and Land Use: Interdependencies, Barriers, and Directions of Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-9, October.
    19. Langmyhr, Tore, 1997. "Managing equity : The case of road pricing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 25-39, January.
    20. Adele Celino & Grazia Concilio, 2011. "Explorative Nature of Negotiation in Participatory Decision Making for Sustainability," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 255-270, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arlaba:102941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arlhade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.