IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v56y2019i12p2515-2531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lobbying for rent regulation in Hong Kong: Rental market politics and framing strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Mandy HM Lau

Abstract

Growing demand for private renting has stimulated debates on rent regulation in many cities. In Hong Kong, grassroots groups have lobbied for stronger rent regulation, in the context of rapidly rising rents. This paper seeks to interpret the evolving dynamics of the rent regulation debate in Hong Kong, from the 1990s to the present. In particular, the paper seeks to interpret changes in the lobbying strategies of advocacy groups, through applying theories from the sociological literature on framing processes. The findings reveal that advocates and opponents disagree because of divergent prognostic frames, despite their similar diagnosis of rental affordability problems. Furthermore, existing motivational frames are unable to mobilise support from a broader range of households. These insights are relevant not only to debates on housing policy, but also to other public policy areas, where the degree of resonance of motivational frames helps explain the change in momentum of policy advocacy work.

Suggested Citation

  • Mandy HM Lau, 2019. "Lobbying for rent regulation in Hong Kong: Rental market politics and framing strategies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2515-2531, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:12:p:2515-2531
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098018791951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098018791951
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098018791951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneider, Anne & Ingram, Helen, 1993. "Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(2), pages 334-347, June.
    2. Marietta Haffner & Marja Elsinga & Joris Hoekstra, 2008. "Rent Regulation: The Balance between Private Landlords and Tenants in Six European Countries," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 217-233.
    3. Kath Hulse & Judith Yates, 2017. "A private rental sector paradox: unpacking the effects of urban restructuring on housing market dynamics," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 253-270, April.
    4. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Andreas Mense & Claus Michelsen, 2016. "Market Break or Simply Fake? Empirics on the Causal Effects of Rent Controls in Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1584, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Marietta Haffner & Marja Elsinga & Joris Hoekstra, 2008. "Rent Regulation: The Balance between Private Landlords and Tenants in Six European Countries," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 217-233.
    6. Peter A. Kemp, 2015. "Private Renting After the Global Financial Crisis," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 601-620, July.
    7. Huib Ernste, 2012. "Framing Cultures of Spatial Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 87-101.
    8. Keith Jacobs, 2015. "The 'Politics' of Australian Housing: The Role of Lobbyists and Their Influence in Shaping Policy," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 694-710, July.
    9. Nicole Gurran & Peter Phibbs, 2015. "Are Governments Really Interested in Fixing the Housing Problem? Policy Capture and Busy Work in Australia," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 711-729, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomschke, Lorenz, 2016. "Distributional price effects of rent controls in Berlin: When expectation meets reality," CAWM Discussion Papers 89, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).
    2. Kim Mckee & Tom Moore & Adriana Soaita & Joe Crawford, 2017. "‘Generation Rent’ and The Fallacy of Choice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 318-333, March.
    3. Steffen Wetzstein, 2017. "The global urban housing affordability crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(14), pages 3159-3177, November.
    4. O’Toole, Conor & Martinez-Cillero, Maria & Ahrens, Achim, 2021. "Price regulation, inflation, and nominal rigidity in housing rents," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    5. Lau, Mandy H.M. & Wei, Xueji, 2018. "Housing size and housing market dynamics: The case of micro-flats in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 278-286.
    6. Kath Hulse & Margaret Reynolds, 2018. "Investification: Financialisation of housing markets and persistence of suburban socio-economic disadvantage," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1655-1671, June.
    7. Luís Mendes, 2022. "The Dysfunctional Rental Market in Portugal: A Policy Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Marietta E. A. Haffner, 2016. "Aides et financements de projets de logements (Subsidies and finance of housing projects)," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 625-627, July.
    9. Murray, Cameron & Ryan-Collins, Josh, 2020. "When homes earn more than jobs: the rentierization of the Australian housing market," OSF Preprints 8f67h, Center for Open Science.
    10. Joris Hoekstra, 2009. "Two Types of Rental System? An Exploratory Empirical Test of Kemeny's Rental System Typology," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 45-62, January.
    11. Are Oust, 2018. "The end of Oslo's rent control: Impact on rent level," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 443-458.
    12. Pnina O. Plaut1 & Steven E. Plaut, 2013. "Who Wants to be a Landlord? Factors that Affect the Inclination of Israeli Households to Rent out Property," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 16(1), pages 119-133.
    13. Wilhelmsson, Mats, 2021. "Demand for rent-regulated apartments:The case of Sweden," Working Paper Series 21/4, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    14. Hulse, Kath & Martin, Chris & James, Amity & Stone, Wendy & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Private rental in transition: institutional change, technology and innovation in Australia," SocArXiv yqbxj, Center for Open Science.
    15. Caroline Dewilde, 2018. "Explaining the declined affordability of housing for low-income private renters across Western Europe," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(12), pages 2618-2639, September.
    16. Hulse, Kath & Parkinson, Sharon & Martin, Chris & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Inquiry into the future of the private rental sector," SocArXiv 6sb8r, Center for Open Science.
    17. Weber, Jan Philip & Lee, Gabriel, . "On the Measure of Private Rental Market Regulation Index and its Effect on Housing Rents: Cross Country Evidence," Beiträge zur Immobilienwirtschaft, University of Regensburg, Department of Economics, number 21, August.
    18. Maddison, Jonathan & Watts, Richard, 2011. "The technological fix as a frame in media debates about tailpipe emissions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 294-303.
    19. Fritz Sager & Yvan Rielle, 2013. "Sorting through the garbage can: under what conditions do governments adopt policy programs?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Cody Hochstenbach, 2018. "Spatializing the intergenerational transmission of inequalities: Parental wealth, residential segregation, and urban inequality," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(3), pages 689-708, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:12:p:2515-2531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.