IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v78y2018icp278-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing size and housing market dynamics: The case of micro-flats in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Lau, Mandy H.M.
  • Wei, Xueji

Abstract

Although housing sizes in Hong Kong have typically been smaller than those in other places, micro-flats of less than 40 square metres have become more prevalent in recent years. Many of these micro-flats have been built in the main urban area, although some are found in suburban areas as well. This paper explores possible factors behind the growth of micro-flats, including demographic trends, affordability problems and government land sale policies. Furthermore, micro-flats may not necessarily be perceived as problematic by actual users, since small housing size might be compensated by other factors such as affordability and proximity to amenities. Thus, the study also involved survey interviews with residents of recently completed micro-flats, to investigate their socio-economic background and their perceptions of living space. The findings reveal that per capita living space of micro-flat residents is indeed low, especially for larger households with three or more people. Furthermore, half of the respondents in suburban micro-flats are homeowners, reflecting the strong pull of homeownership versus private renting. The findings point towards the merits of facilitating supply of suburban micro-flats through land sale policies, to provide more affordable options for households less inclined towards long-term renting.

Suggested Citation

  • Lau, Mandy H.M. & Wei, Xueji, 2018. "Housing size and housing market dynamics: The case of micro-flats in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 278-286.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:278-286
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717316745
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kath Hulse & Judith Yates, 2017. "A private rental sector paradox: unpacking the effects of urban restructuring on housing market dynamics," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 253-270, April.
    2. Peter A. Kemp, 2015. "Private Renting After the Global Financial Crisis," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 601-620, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Choy, Siu-Kai & Yu, Carisa K.W. & Lee, Tanki C.L. & Lam, Benson S.Y. & Wong, Catherine Y.W., 2021. "A two-stage variational jump point detection algorithm for real estate analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Jenny Preece & Kim McKee & David Robinson & John Flint, 2023. "Urban rhythms in a small home: COVID-19 as a mechanism of exception," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1650-1667, July.
    3. Yingqi Guo & Cheuk-Yui Yeung & Geoff C. H. Chan & Qingsong Chang & Hector W. H. Tsang & Paul S. F. Yip, 2022. "Mobility Based on GPS Trajectory Data and Interviews: A Pilot Study to Understand the Differences between Lower- and Higher-Income Older Adults in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kath Hulse & Margaret Reynolds, 2018. "Investification: Financialisation of housing markets and persistence of suburban socio-economic disadvantage," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1655-1671, June.
    2. Hulse, Kath & Martin, Chris & James, Amity & Stone, Wendy & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Private rental in transition: institutional change, technology and innovation in Australia," SocArXiv yqbxj, Center for Open Science.
    3. Mandy HM Lau, 2019. "Lobbying for rent regulation in Hong Kong: Rental market politics and framing strategies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2515-2531, September.
    4. Caroline Dewilde, 2018. "Explaining the declined affordability of housing for low-income private renters across Western Europe," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(12), pages 2618-2639, September.
    5. Hulse, Kath & Parkinson, Sharon & Martin, Chris & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Inquiry into the future of the private rental sector," SocArXiv 6sb8r, Center for Open Science.
    6. Kath Hulse & Zoë Goodall, 2023. "Reforming the Private Rental Sector: Challenges in the 2020s and Beyond," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(2), pages 240-248, June.
    7. Engelbert Stockhammer & Christina Wolf, 2019. "Building blocks for the macroeconomics and political economy of housing," Japanese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1-2), pages 43-67, April.
    8. Aveline-Dubach, Natacha, 2022. "The financialization of rental housing in Tokyo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Michael Byrne & Michelle Norris, 2022. "Housing market financialization, neoliberalism and everyday retrenchment of social housing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(1), pages 182-198, February.
    10. Murphy, Michael J. & Grundy, Emily, 2024. "Housing tenure and disability in the UK: trends and projections 2004-2030," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120247, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Cody Hochstenbach, 2018. "Spatializing the intergenerational transmission of inequalities: Parental wealth, residential segregation, and urban inequality," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(3), pages 689-708, May.
    12. Eoin Corrigan, 2019. "The Scale and Impact of the Local Authority Rent Subsidy," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 50(1), pages 159-211.
    13. Caroline Barratt & Gill Green, 2017. "Making a House in Multiple Occupation a Home: Using Visual Ethnography to Explore Issues of Identity and Well-Being in the Experience of Creating a Home Amongst HMO Tenants," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 95-112, February.
    14. P. S. Morawakage & G. Earl & B. Liu & E. Roca & A. Omura, 2023. "Housing Risk and Returns in Submarkets with Spatial Dependence and Heterogeneity," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 695-734, November.
    15. Zahratu Shabrina & Elsa Arcaute & Michael Batty, 2022. "Airbnb and its potential impact on the London housing market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 197-221, January.
    16. Jennifer Hoolachan & Kim McKee, 2019. "Inter-generational housing inequalities: ‘Baby Boomers’ versus the ‘Millennials’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 210-225, January.
    17. Adrienne Csizmady & Lea Kőszeghy, 2022. "‘Generation Rent’ in a Super Homeownership Environment: The Case of Budapest, Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Matthew Palm & Katrina Eve Raynor & Georgia Warren-Myers, 2021. "Examining building age, rental housing and price filtering for affordability in Melbourne, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(4), pages 809-825, March.
    19. Gurran, Nicole & Hulse, Kath & Dodson, Jago & Pill, Madeleine & Dowling, Robyn & reynolds, margaret & Maalsen, Sophia, 2021. "Urban productivity and affordable rental housing supply in Australian cities and regions," SocArXiv qrdb6, Center for Open Science.
    20. ViforJ, Rachel Ong & Singh, Ranjodh & Baker, Emma & Bentley, Rebecca & Hewton, Jack, 2022. "Precarious housing and wellbeing: a multi-dimensional investigation," SocArXiv ezf83, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:278-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.