IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/era/chaptr/2015-rpr-23-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Socio-economic Impacts of an LPG Subsidy Removal on the Household Sector in India

In: Institutional Policy and Economic Impacts of Energy Subsidies Removal in East Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Sangeeta V. Sharma
  • Vinod K. Sharma

Abstract

This study examines the socio-economically acceptable strategies that India should adopt for removing its liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) subsidies. In India, a large number of rural households and poorer households in urban areas still use inefficient fuels for cooking and other household needs. The use of clean forms of energy, namely LPG, as a cooking fuel and for lighting, is mostly restricted to urban and affluent households. This energy-use inequity has adverse socio-economic impacts, such as negative effects on health, increased deforestation, and environmental degradation. The Government of India provides large subsidies on LPG use in the household sector, resulting in a negative impact on the country’s economy. To reduce the LPG subsidy burden on the fiscal budget, the Government of India has introduced many ameliorative measures, such as fixing the number of annual subsidised LPG cylinders per household, providing direct beneficiary cash transfers, and encouraging affluent consumers to forgo their subsidies. In our study, we use sets of regressions to predict the socio-economic impacts of the removal of LPG subsidies on the Indian economy. However, a limitation of our analysis is the availability of data, as we use data for the period 2001–2014. This data is available only on an annual basis, so we have 14 observations per variable for all sets of regressions. From our analysis, we infer that the impact of the LPG subsidy removal indicates a positive relationship between gross domestic product and the consumption of LPG, as income generated during the fiscal year is positively related to LPG consumption. Secondly, estimating the total LPG subsidy as a function of total consumption, we see that consumption is not a determinant of the total subsidy bill of LPG. Thirdly, when total LPG consumption is regressed on the LPG market price, gross domestic product, and the regressand’s lagged value, the results indicate that the price of LPG, with or without the subsidy, is not a significant determinant of its consumption expenditure. Finally, evaluating the macroeconomic impact of a change in the LPG subsidy on the economy suggests that the rate of growth of the economy is not affected by changes in the LPG subsidy. Thus, we summarise that removal or reduction of the current LPG subsidy will not have a significant impact on the Indian economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangeeta V. Sharma & Vinod K. Sharma, 2017. "Socio-economic Impacts of an LPG Subsidy Removal on the Household Sector in India," Chapters, in: Han Phoumin & Shigeru Kimura (ed.), Institutional Policy and Economic Impacts of Energy Subsidies Removal in East Asia, chapter 5, pages 83-99, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
  • Handle: RePEc:era:chaptr:2015-rpr-23-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eria.org/RPR_FY2015_No.23_Chapter_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2008. "Climate Change and the World Bank Group - Phase I : An Evaluation of World Bank Win-Win Energy Policy Reforms," World Bank Publications - Reports 10594, The World Bank Group.
    2. Gangopadhyay, Shubhashis & Ramaswami, Bharat & Wadhwa, Wilima, 2005. "Reducing subsidies on household fuels in India: how will it affect the poor?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(18), pages 2326-2336, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han Phoumin & Shigeru Kimura, 2017. "Institutional Policy and Economic Impacts of Energy Subsidies Removal in East Asia," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2015-rpr-23 edited by Han Phoumin & Shigeru Kimura, March.
    2. Acharya, Rajesh H. & Sadath, Anver C., 2017. "Implications of energy subsidy reform in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 453-462.
    3. Wang, Yanxiang & Ali Almazrooei, Shaikha & Kapsalyamova, Zhanna & Diabat, Ali & Tsai, I-Tsung, 2016. "Utility subsidy reform in Abu Dhabi: A review and a Computable General Equilibrium analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1352-1362.
    4. Shan Zhou & Douglas S. Noonan, 2019. "Justice Implications of Clean Energy Policies and Programs in the United States: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Cathrine Hagem & Halvor Briseid Storrøsten, 2019. "Supply‐ versus Demand‐Side Policies in the Presence of Carbon Leakage and the Green Paradox," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(1), pages 379-406, January.
    6. Iuliia Ogarenko & Klaus Hubacek, 2013. "Eliminating Indirect Energy Subsidies in Ukraine: Estimation of Environmental and Socioeconomic Effects Using Input–Output Modeling," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 2(1), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Balachandra, P. & Kristle Nathan, Hippu Salk & Reddy, B. Sudhakara, 2010. "Commercialization of sustainable energy technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1842-1851.
    8. International Monetary Fund, 2008. "India: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2008/052, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Khalid, Syed Adnan & Salman, Verda, 2020. "“Welfare impact of electricity subsidy reforms in Pakistan: A micro model study”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Yawale, Satish Kumar & Hanaoka, Tatsuya & Kapshe, Manmohan & Pandey, Rahul, 2023. "End-use energy projections: Future regional disparity and energy poverty at the household level in rural and urban areas of India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Rajesh Kalli & Pradyot Ranjan Jena & Shunsuke Managi, 2022. "Subsidized LPG Scheme and the Shift to Cleaner Household Energy Use: Evidence from a Tribal Community of Eastern India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Solaymani, Saeed & Kari, Fatimah, 2014. "Impacts of energy subsidy reform on the Malaysian economy and transportation sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 115-125.
    13. Rehman, I.H. & Kar, Abhishek & Banerjee, Manjushree & Kumar, Preeth & Shardul, Martand & Mohanty, Jeevan & Hossain, Ijaz, 2012. "Understanding the political economy and key drivers of energy access in addressing national energy access priorities and policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(S1), pages 27-37.
    14. Bazilian, Morgan & Onyeji, Ijeoma, 2012. "Fossil fuel subsidy removal and inadequate public power supply: Implications for businesses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-5.
    15. Pani, Marco & Perroni, Carlo, 2018. "Energy subsidies and policy commitment in political equilibrium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 149-160.
    16. B. Sudhkara Reddy & Hippu Salk Kristle Nathan, 2010. "Energy infrastructure for a high humane and low corbon future," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2010-007, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    17. van Ruijven, Bas J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & de Vries, Bert J.M. & Isaac, Morna & van der Sluijs, Jeroen P. & Lucas, Paul L. & Balachandra, P., 2011. "Model projections for household energy use in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7747-7761.
    18. Aryanpur, Vahid & Fattahi, Mahshid & Mamipour, Siab & Ghahremani, Mahsa & Gallachóir, Brian Ó & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Glynn, James, 2022. "How energy subsidy reform can drive the Iranian power sector towards a low-carbon future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Lin, Boqiang & Jiang, Zhujun, 2011. "Estimates of energy subsidies in China and impact of energy subsidy reform," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 273-283, March.
    20. Yaqoot, Mohammed & Diwan, Parag & Kandpal, Tara C., 2015. "Public financing of solar lanterns versus subsidizing kerosene for domestic lighting in India: A feasibility assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 564-572.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:era:chaptr:2015-rpr-23-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ranti Amelia The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ranti Amelia to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eriadid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.