IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/bis/bisbpc/102-08.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comments on "Measuring corporate bond liquidity in emerging markets: price- vs quantity-based measures"

In: Asia-Pacific fixed income markets: evolving structure, participation and pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Dragon Yongjun Tang

Abstract

The authors of this paper (Hameed, Helwege, Li and Packer) examine the liquidity of corporate bonds in emerging market economies (EMEs). Their main goal is to identify the most effective measures of corporate bond liquidity in EMEs. Six quantity-based (eg turnover) and six price-based (eg the absolute return over volume ratio or the Amihud measure) measures are studied. Analysing a large sample of corporate bonds from Malaysia during the period 1997–2017 with transactions recorded on an electronic trading platform, the authors find that quantity-based measures are more effective in capturing bond liquidity differences than price-based measures. Their findings are the same for both Islamic and conventional bonds. Overall, the bonds under study are considerably illiquid. Establishing ways to accurately measure bond liquidity is of interest to traders and policy makers. Bond market makers may demand premiums for liquidity provisions. If liquidity is not measured correctly, market makers will be less able to support the proper functioning of the bond market. Policy makers are also keen to gauge the current liquidity status of the bond market so as to effectively intervene, when necessary, to improve financial conditions and thus benefit society in general. For example, in recent years, central banks worldwide have begun engineering bond purchase programmes to improve bond market liquidity and corporate finance (eg the European Central Bank initiated the corporate sector purchase programme in June 2016). This paper contributes to the literature by providing evidence showing that quantity-based measures are more appropriate than price-based measures in capturing bond liquidity differences in EMEs. Moreover, it sheds light on the development of the corporate bond market in EMEs. Despite its great potential, the Islamic bond market has not grown much. New issuances have been fluctuating at around $80 billion per year (see Table 1). A potential cause of the stagnation of the market is lack of liquidity. Given that the majority of the sample bonds are Islamic bonds, this study makes a useful contribution to our understanding of the Islamic bond market.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragon Yongjun Tang, 2019. "Comments on "Measuring corporate bond liquidity in emerging markets: price- vs quantity-based measures"," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Asia-Pacific fixed income markets: evolving structure, participation and pricing, volume 102, pages 63-66, Bank for International Settlements.
    • Handle: RePEc:bis:bisbpc:102-08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap102_f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raphael Schestag & Philipp Schuster & Marliese Uhrig-Homburg, 2016. "Measuring Liquidity in Bond Markets," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(5), pages 1170-1219.
    2. Marlene Amstad & Zhiguo He, 2019. "Chinese Bond Market and Interbank Market," NBER Working Papers 25549, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Alzahrani, Mohammed, 2019. "Islamic corporate finance, financial markets, and institutions: An overview," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-5.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, He & Yao, Yang & Zhou, Yue, 2022. "Markets price politicians: Evidence from China’s municipal bond markets," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Xuanjuan Chen & Jing-Zhi Huang & Zhenzhen Sun & Tong Yao & Tong Yu, 2020. "Liquidity Premium in the Eye of the Beholder: An Analysis of the Clientele Effect in the Corporate Bond Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 932-957, February.
    3. Goldstein, Itay & Jiang, Hao & Ng, David T., 2017. "Investor flows and fragility in corporate bond funds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 592-613.
    4. Gan, Tian & Jiang, Yan & Wu, Xi & Zhang, Mingxin, 2023. "Oil price uncertainty and the cost of debt: Evidence from the Chinese bond market," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Grosse-Rueschkamp, Benjamin & Steffen, Sascha & Streitz, Daniel, 2019. "A capital structure channel of monetary policy," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 357-378.
    6. Goldstein, Michael A. & Namin, Elmira Shekari, 2023. "Corporate bond liquidity and yield spreads: A review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Diego Leal Gonzalez & Bryan Stanhouse & Duane Stock & Xin Yue Zhou, 2025. "Nonlinear structural estimation of corporate bond liquidity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 799-827, February.
    8. Kaviani, Mahsa S. & Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Maleki, Hosein & Savor, Pavel, 2020. "Policy uncertainty and corporate credit spreads," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 838-865.
    9. Chen, Bing & Li, Li & Peng, Fei & Anwar, Sajid, 2020. "Risk contagion in the banking network: New evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Boyarchenko, Nina & Crump, Richard K. & Kovner, Anna & Shachar, Or, 2025. "Corporate bond market distress," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Zhao, Yang & Yu, Min-Teh, 2019. "Measuring the liquidity impact on catastrophe bond spreads," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 197-210.
    12. Muñiz, José Antonio & Larkin, Charles & Corbet, Shaen, 2025. "Understanding the use of unconventional monetary policy for portfolio decarbonisation in Europe," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Broto, Carmen & Lamas, Matías, 2020. "Is market liquidity less resilient after the financial crisis? Evidence for US Treasuries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 217-229.
    14. Weigerding, Michael, 2020. "Seasonal liquidity effects and their determinants on the covered bond market," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 288-303.
    15. Lena Boneva & David Elliott & Iryna Kaminska & Oliver Linton & Nick McLaren & Ben Morley, 2022. "The Impact of Corporate QE on Liquidity: Evidence from the UK," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(648), pages 2615-2643.
    16. Jean-Edouard Colliard & Thierry Foucault & Peter Hoffmann, 2018. "Inventory Management, Dealers' Connections, and Prices in OTC Markets," Working Papers hal-01933855, HAL.
    17. Díaz, Antonio & Escribano, Ana, 2022. "Liquidity dimensions in the U.S. corporate bond market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1163-1179.
    18. Qin, Nan & Wang, Ying, 2021. "Does portfolio concentration affect performance? Evidence from corporate bond mutual funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    19. Olivier Accominotti & Thilo N H Albers & Kim Oosterlinck, 2024. "Selective Default Expectations," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 37(6), pages 1979-2015.
    20. Mengting Fan & Zan Mo & Qizhi Zhao & Yi Liang & Shaoyang Guo & Yanjun Chen, 2024. "Unraveling Double Shocks: An In-Depth Analysis of Risk Contagion in China’s Inter-Bank Market," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 20251-20298, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:bisbpc:102-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Fessler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.