Can more education be bad? Some simple analytics on financing better education for development
In: Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 5
While the model in this paper remains close to the Heckscher-Ohlin tradition, it is shown that, contrary to the standard results, it is the net effect of prices, taxation, and accumulation of endowments that determines the Rybczynski-type growth effects, which may help explain the lack of consensus in the empirical literature on education and growth. A central feature of the model is that the accumulation of endowments depends on the output of education, while the changes in labour supply, which determine the effective production possibilities frontier, also depend on individuals’ decisions on allocation of time, affected by relative prices and fiscal policy. On the one hand, in the model the composition of the output of education depends on education quality, so the composition of the inflow of entrants to the labour market can be upgraded by suitable policies. On the other hand, the risks of a skill supply-reducing government intervention are discussed. The analysis has implications for policymakers in developing countries where both the economy’s production possibilities and the education sector need to be enhanced, as it reveals the possibility of a ‘bad reform’ where the expected benefits of government’s interventions in education can be contradicted by the general equilibrium effects of the policy. A sufficient condition to avoid this situation is identified in the paper.
|This chapter was published in: ||This item is provided by Asociación de Economía de la Educación in its series Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 5 with number
05-55.||Handle:|| RePEc:aec:ieed05:05-55||Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.economicsofeducation.com|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Blankenau, William F. & Simpson, Nicole B., 2004. "Public education expenditures and growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 583-605, April.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aec:ieed05:05-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Domingo P. Ximénez-de-Embún)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.