IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pfr378.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Uwe R. Fritsche

Personal Details

First Name:Uwe
Middle Name:R.
Last Name:Fritsche
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pfr378
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://iinas.org

Affiliation

IINAS - Internationales Institut für Nachhaltigkeitsanalysen und -strategien

http://www.iinas.org
Darmstadt, Germany

Research output

as
Jump to: Articles

Articles

  1. Ronald S. Zalesny & Göran Berndes & Ioannis Dimitriou & Uwe Fritsche & Constance Miller & Mark Eisenbies & Solomon Ghezehei & Dennis Hazel & William L. Headlee & Blas Mola‐Yudego & M. Cristina Negri &, 2019. "Positive water linkages of producing short rotation poplars and willows for bioenergy and phytotechnologies," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), September.
  2. Uwe R. Fritsche & Leire Iriarte, 2014. "Sustainability Criteria and Indicators for the Bio-Based Economy in Europe: State of Discussion and Way Forward," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, October.
  3. Uwe R. Fritsche & Leire Iriarte & Johnny de Jong & Alessandro Agostini & Nicolae Scarlat, 2014. "Extending the EU Renewable Energy Directive sustainability criteria to solid bioenergy from forests," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(2), pages 129-140, May.
  4. Jörg Adolf & Horst Fehrenbach & Uwe Fritsche & Dorothea Liebig, 2013. "Welche Rolle können Biokraftstoffe im Verkehrssektor spielen?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 93(2), pages 124-131, February.
  5. Volrad Wollny & Günter Dehoust & Uwe R. Fritsche & Peter Weinem, 2001. "Comparison of Plastic Packaging Waste Management Options: Feedstock Recycling versus Energy Recovery in Germany," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 5(3), pages 49-63, July.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Articles

  1. Ronald S. Zalesny & Göran Berndes & Ioannis Dimitriou & Uwe Fritsche & Constance Miller & Mark Eisenbies & Solomon Ghezehei & Dennis Hazel & William L. Headlee & Blas Mola‐Yudego & M. Cristina Negri &, 2019. "Positive water linkages of producing short rotation poplars and willows for bioenergy and phytotechnologies," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), September.

    Cited by:

    1. Oskar Englund & Ioannis Dimitriou & Virginia H. Dale & Keith L. Kline & Blas Mola‐Yudego & Fionnuala Murphy & Burton English & John McGrath & Gerald Busch & Maria Cristina Negri & Mark Brown & Kevin G, 2020. "Multifunctional perennial production systems for bioenergy: performance and progress," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(5), September.
    2. Di Vaio, Assunta & Trujillo, Lourdes & D'Amore, Gabriella & Palladino, Rosa, 2021. "Water governance models for meeting sustainable development Goals:A structured literature review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

  2. Uwe R. Fritsche & Leire Iriarte, 2014. "Sustainability Criteria and Indicators for the Bio-Based Economy in Europe: State of Discussion and Way Forward," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Nina Hagemann & Erik Gawel & Alexandra Purkus & Nadine Pannicke & Jennifer Hauck, 2016. "Possible Futures towards a Wood-Based Bioeconomy: A Scenario Analysis for Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Patricia D. Fuentes-Saguar & Alfredo J. Mainar-Causapé & Emanuele Ferrari, 2017. "The Role of Bioeconomy Sectors and Natural Resources in EU Economies: A Social Accounting Matrix-Based Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Enrica Imbert, 2018. "Social Life Cycle Approach as a Tool for Promoting the Market Uptake of Bio-Based Products from a Consumer Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Ilaria Zambon & Massimo Cecchini & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Andrea Colantoni, 2019. "Revolutionizing Towards Sustainable Agricultural Systems: The Role of Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-11, September.
    5. de Souza, Lorena Mendes & Mendes, Pietro A.S. & Aranda, Donato A.G., 2018. "Assessing the current scenario of the Brazilian biojet market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 426-438.
    6. Alfredo J. Mainar-Causapé, 2019. "Análisis de los sectores de Bioeconomía a través de matrices de contabilidad social específicas (BioSAMs): el caso de España," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 45, pages 273-282.
    7. Rolf Meyer, 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-32, June.
    8. Philippidis, George & M'Barek, Robert & Urban-Boysen, Kirsten & Van Zeist, Willem-Jan, 2023. "Exploring economy-wide sustainable conditions for EU bio-chemical activities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Paweł Chmieliński & Wioletta Wrzaszcz & Marek Zieliński & Marek Wigier, 2022. "Intensity and Biodiversity: The ‘Green’ Potential of Agriculture and Rural Territories in Poland in the Context of Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Alfredo J. Mainar Causape & George Philippidis & Ana Isabel Sanjuán, 2017. "Analysis of structural patterns in highly disaggregated bioeconomy sectors by EU Member States using SAM/IO multipliers," JRC Research Reports JRC106676, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Wiebke Jander & Sven Wydra & Johann Wackerbauer & Philipp Grundmann & Stephan Piotrowski, 2020. "Monitoring Bioeconomy Transitions with Economic–Environmental and Innovation Indicators: Addressing Data Gaps in the Short Term," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Philippidis, George & Bartelings, Heleen & Smeets, Edward, 2018. "Sailing into Unchartered Waters: Plotting a Course for EU Bio-Based Sectors," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 410-421.
    13. Stefan Bößner & Francis X. Johnson & Zoha Shawoo, 2020. "Governing the Bioeconomy: What Role for International Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Beatriz M. Paredes-Sánchez & José P. Paredes-Sánchez & Paulino J. García-Nieto, 2020. "Energy Multiphase Model for Biocoal Conversion Systems by Means of a Nodal Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
    15. George Philippidis & Robert M'barek & Willem‐Jan van Zeist, 2023. "Bioeconomy Transition Pathways – Potential Impacts for the EU Bio‐based Chemicals Sector," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 22(3), pages 28-36, December.
    16. Papagianni, Stavroula & Capellán-Pérez, Iñigo & Adam, Alexandros & Pastor, Amandine, 2024. "Review and meta-analysis of Energy Return on Investment and environmental indicators of biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Erik Gawel & Nadine Pannicke & Nina Hagemann, 2019. "A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Florian MARIN, 2020. "Collective Agreement - A Tool For Strengthening Public Policies In The Area Of Social Responsibility," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 41-60, March.
    19. Philippidis, George & Álvarez, Rodrigo Xavier & Di Lucia, Lorenzo & Hermoso, Hugo González & Martinez, Ana González & M'barek, Robert & Moiseyev, Alexander & Panoutsou, Calliope & Itoiz, Eva Sevigne &, 2024. "The development of bio-based industry in the European Union: A prospective integrated modelling assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    20. Carmen Priefer & Juliane Jörissen & Oliver Frör, 2017. "Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, February.
    21. Pulighe, Giuseppe & Bonati, Guido & Colangeli, Marco & Morese, Maria Michela & Traverso, Lorenzo & Lupia, Flavio & Khawaja, Cosette & Janssen, Rainer & Fava, Francesco, 2019. "Ongoing and emerging issues for sustainable bioenergy production on marginal lands in the Mediterranean regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 58-70.
    22. R. N. Ossei-Bremang & F. Kemausuor, 2021. "A decision support system for the selection of sustainable biomass resources for bioenergy production," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 437-454, September.
    23. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen, J., 2021. "Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    24. Alfredo J. Mainar Causape & George Philippidis & Arnaldo Caivano, 2018. "BioSAMs for the EU Member States: Constructing Social Accounting Matrices with a detailed disaggregation of the bio-economy," JRC Research Reports JRC111812, Joint Research Centre.
    25. Baldoni, Edoardo & Philippidis, George & Spekreijse, Jurjen & Gurría, Patricia & Lammens, Tijs & Parisi, Claudia & Ronzon, Tévécia & Vis, Martijn & M'Barek, Robert, 2021. "Getting your hands dirty: A data digging exercise to unearth the EU's bio-based chemical sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    26. Jakob Hildebrandt & Alberto Bezama & Daniela Thrän, 2020. "Insights from the Sustainability Monitoring Tool SUMINISTRO Applied to a Case Study System of Prospective Wood-Based Industry Networks in Central Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, May.
    27. George Philippidis & Robert M’barek & Emanuele Ferrari, 2016. "Is ‘Bio-Based’ Activity a Panacea for Sustainable Competitive Growth?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, October.
    28. Van Schoubroeck, Sophie & Van Dael, Miet & Van Passel, Steven & Malina, Robert, 2018. "A review of sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 115-126.

  3. Uwe R. Fritsche & Leire Iriarte & Johnny de Jong & Alessandro Agostini & Nicolae Scarlat, 2014. "Extending the EU Renewable Energy Directive sustainability criteria to solid bioenergy from forests," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(2), pages 129-140, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Giuntoli, J. & Barredo, J.I. & Avitabile, V. & Camia, A. & Cazzaniga, N.E. & Grassi, G. & Jasinevičius, G. & Jonsson, R. & Marelli, L. & Robert, N. & Agostini, A. & Mubareka, S., 2022. "The quest for sustainable forest bioenergy: win-win solutions for climate and biodiversity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

  4. Volrad Wollny & Günter Dehoust & Uwe R. Fritsche & Peter Weinem, 2001. "Comparison of Plastic Packaging Waste Management Options: Feedstock Recycling versus Energy Recovery in Germany," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 5(3), pages 49-63, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Raoul Voss & Roh Pin Lee & Magnus Fröhling, 2023. "A consequential approach to life cycle sustainability assessment with an agent‐based model to determine the potential contribution of chemical recycling to UN Sustainable Development Goals," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 726-745, June.
    2. Bassey, Uduak & Sarquah, Khadija & Hartmann, Michael & Tom, Abasi-ofon & Beck, Gesa & Antwi, Edward & Narra, Satyanarayana & Nelles, Michael, 2023. "Thermal treatment options for single-use, multilayered and composite waste plastics in Africa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Piya Kerdlap & Aloisius Rabata Purnama & Jonathan Sze Choong Low & Daren Zong Loong Tan & Claire Y. Barlow & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2022. "Comparing the environmental performance of distributed versus centralized plastic recycling systems: Applying hybrid simulation modeling to life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 252-271, February.
    4. Ricardo Marques Sastre & Istefani Carísio de Paula & Marcia Elisa Soares Echeveste, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review on Packaging Sustainability: Contents, Opportunities, and Guidelines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, May.
    5. Alba Bala & Marco Raugei & Carlos Afonso Teixeira & Alberto Fernández & Francisco Pan-Montojo & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer, 2021. "Assessing the Environmental Performance of Municipal Solid Waste Collection: A New Predictive LCA Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Seyedehfarzaneh Nojabaei & Omid Nematshahi & Matthew Franchetti, 2015. "An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of the Em-Ferro Plastic Sorting Technology," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 7(1), pages 33-47, May.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Uwe R. Fritsche should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.