IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abk/jajeba/ajebasp.2015.33.47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of the Em-Ferro Plastic Sorting Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Seyedehfarzaneh Nojabaei
  • Omid Nematshahi
  • Matthew Franchetti

Abstract

Recycling has been continually practiced since the dawn of mankind; however, increasing production costs as well as environmental impacts of the conventional waste disposal methods have shed a light on the importance of recycling as a sustainable way to produce goods and services. Recycling has proven to be beneficial, economically and environmentally: It saves resources, prevents pollution, supports public health and creates jobs. Recycling can be applied to different materials present in the Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). Plastics constitute a substantial portion of the MSW. In 2012, plastics accounted for 12.7% of the total MSW generated in the United States. However, only of the total amount of plastic generated in 2012 was recovered for recycling. Currently, the major part of the plastics generated is disposed of through incineration or landfilling. These conventional disposal methods impose serious threats to the environment such as greenhouse gas emission and soil and underground water contamination. These effects along with the versatility of the plastic waste have led the development of more environmental friendly plastic recycling methods. Prior to recovery, the plastic waste should be sorted into the different plastic types it is composed of. Traditional plastic sorting methods used optical or manual sortation which was not only costly but also susceptible to high nonconformance rates. Newer technologies have been developed that have higher output and are more economically justifiable. This thesis performs and economical and environmental comparison between five plastic sorting methods that are currently in use and one emerging technology which uses Electromagnetic (EM) waves and ferrofluid to sort plastics. Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA) is the method used to collect the data and perform the analyses. Two economic measures are used to evaluate the methods from an economical point of view. The objective is to study how the new method compares to the existing methods both economically and environmentally using a case study in Toledo, Ohio. The data related to cost, energy requirements and carbon emissions were collected through contacting local vendors. The results of the study showed that all of the methods have positive economic performance with minor variations in energy use and carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyedehfarzaneh Nojabaei & Omid Nematshahi & Matthew Franchetti, 2015. "An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of the Em-Ferro Plastic Sorting Technology," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 7(1), pages 33-47, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2015.33.47
    DOI: 10.3844/ajebasp.2015.33.47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/pdf/ajebasp.2015.33.47.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/abstract/ajebasp.2015.33.47
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3844/ajebasp.2015.33.47?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volrad Wollny & Günter Dehoust & Uwe R. Fritsche & Peter Weinem, 2001. "Comparison of Plastic Packaging Waste Management Options: Feedstock Recycling versus Energy Recovery in Germany," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 5(3), pages 49-63, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bassey, Uduak & Sarquah, Khadija & Hartmann, Michael & Tom, Abasi-ofon & Beck, Gesa & Antwi, Edward & Narra, Satyanarayana & Nelles, Michael, 2023. "Thermal treatment options for single-use, multilayered and composite waste plastics in Africa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    2. Raoul Voss & Roh Pin Lee & Magnus Fröhling, 2023. "A consequential approach to life cycle sustainability assessment with an agent‐based model to determine the potential contribution of chemical recycling to UN Sustainable Development Goals," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 726-745, June.
    3. Ricardo Marques Sastre & Istefani Carísio de Paula & Marcia Elisa Soares Echeveste, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review on Packaging Sustainability: Contents, Opportunities, and Guidelines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, May.
    4. Piya Kerdlap & Aloisius Rabata Purnama & Jonathan Sze Choong Low & Daren Zong Loong Tan & Claire Y. Barlow & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2022. "Comparing the environmental performance of distributed versus centralized plastic recycling systems: Applying hybrid simulation modeling to life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 252-271, February.
    5. Alba Bala & Marco Raugei & Carlos Afonso Teixeira & Alberto Fernández & Francisco Pan-Montojo & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer, 2021. "Assessing the Environmental Performance of Municipal Solid Waste Collection: A New Predictive LCA Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2015.33.47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jeffery Daniels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thescipub.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.