IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pbh175.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Swati Bhatt

Personal Details

First Name:Swati
Middle Name:
Last Name:Bhatt
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pbh175
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Department of Economics
Princeton University

Princeton, New Jersey (United States)
https://economics.princeton.edu/
RePEc:edi:deprius (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books

Working papers

  1. Swati Bhatt, 1987. "The role of stock index derivative products in equity market volatility," Research Paper 8709, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  2. Swati Bhatt, 1987. "The impact of stock index arbitrage on equity markets - theory and evidence," Research Paper 8707, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Articles

  1. Swati Bhatt & Nusret Cakici, 1990. "Premiums on stock index futures‐some evidence," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 367-375, August.
  2. Bhatt, Swati, 1989. "Demand uncertainty in a durable goods monopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 341-355.
  3. Bhatt, Swati, 1987. "Strategic Product Choice in Differentiated Markets," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 207-216, December.

Books

  1. Swati Bhatt, 2017. "How Digital Communication Technology Shapes Markets," Palgrave Advances in Economics of Innovation and Technology, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-319-47250-8, December.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

    Sorry, no citations of working papers recorded.

Articles

  1. Swati Bhatt & Nusret Cakici, 1990. "Premiums on stock index futures‐some evidence," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 367-375, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Lafuente Luengo, Juan Ángel, 2000. "Optimal hedging under departures from the cost of carry valuation: evidence from the spanish stock index futures market," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB 9853, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    2. Bühler, Wolfgang & Kempf, Alexander, 1994. "DAX Index Futures: Mispricing and Arbitrage in German Markets," ZEW Discussion Papers 94-15, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Białkowski, Jędrzej & Perera, Devmali, 2019. "Stock index futures arbitrage: Evidence from a meta-analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 284-294.
    4. Joseph K.W. Fung, 2006. "Order Imbalance and the Pricing of Index Futures," Working Papers 132006, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.
    5. Chris Bilson & Tim Brailsford & Twm Evans, 2005. "The International Transmission of Arbitrage Information Across Futures Markets," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5‐6), pages 973-1000, June.
    6. Tim Brailsford & Allan Hodgson, 1997. "Mispricing in Stock Index Futures: A Re†Examination Using the SPI," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 22(1), pages 21-45, June.
    7. Hsinan Hsu & Hsing-Chi Wu & Hsien-Yi Lee & Janchung Wang, 2010. "A measurement of the extent of market imperfections between markets and applications," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(16), pages 2111-2126.
    8. Seungho Lee, 2022. "The COVID-19 pandemic, short-sale ban, and market efficiency: empirical evidence from the European equity markets," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 156-171, March.
    9. Lai, Ya-Wen & Lin, Chiou-Fa & Tang, Mei-Ling, 2017. "Mispricing and trader positions in the S&P 500 index futures market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 250-265.
    10. Lee, Seungho & Meslmani, Nabil El & Switzer, Lorne N., 2020. "Pricing Efficiency and Arbitrage in the Bitcoin Spot and Futures Markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    11. Bühler, Wolfgang & Kempf, Alexander, 1993. "Der DAX-Future: Kursverhalten und Arbitragemöglichkeiten," ZEW Discussion Papers 93-02, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Kristoffer Glover & Hardy Hulley, 2022. "Financially constrained index futures arbitrage," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(9), pages 1688-1703, September.

  2. Bhatt, Swati, 1989. "Demand uncertainty in a durable goods monopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 341-355.

    Cited by:

    1. Preyas S. Desai & Oded Koenigsberg & Devavrat Purohit, 2007. "Research Note--The Role of Production Lead Time and Demand Uncertainty in Marketing Durable Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 150-158, January.
    2. Gregory Goering & Michael Pippenger, 2002. "Durable Goods Monopoly and Forward Markets," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 271-282.
    3. Gregory E. Goering, 2012. "Taxation and Durable-Goods Monopoly: Does a Current Tax Influence Firm Behavior?," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 2, pages 20-28, August.
    4. Jorge Padilla & Joe Perkins & Salvatore Piccolo, 2020. "Self-Preferencing in Markets with Vertically-Integrated Gatekeeper Platforms," CSEF Working Papers 582, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    5. Paul S. Calem, 1997. "Durable Goods Monopoly with Limited Choice of Commitment Strategy: When Should the Monopolist Precommit?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(1), pages 104-117, July.
    6. Usategui Díaz de Otalora, José María, 2001. "Commitment Power in a Non-Stationary Durable-Good Market," BILTOKI 1134-8984, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística).
    7. Gregory Goering & Michael Pippenger, 2009. "Exchange Rates and Concurrent Leasing and Selling in Durable-Goods Monopoly," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 37(2), pages 187-196, June.
    8. Tilson, Vera & Zheng, Xiaobo, 2014. "Monopoly production and pricing of finitely durable goods with strategic consumers׳ fluctuating willingness to pay," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 217-232.
    9. Jorge Padilla & Joe Perkins & Salvatore Piccolo, 2022. "Self‐Preferencing in Markets with Vertically Integrated Gatekeeper Platforms," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 371-395, June.
    10. Rajeev Goel, 2006. "Uncertain innovation with uncertain product durability," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(13), pages 829-834.
    11. Patrick Leoni, 2012. "Rational expectations and monopolistic trades," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 129-140, October.

  3. Bhatt, Swati, 1987. "Strategic Product Choice in Differentiated Markets," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 207-216, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Fontana & Lionel Nesta, 2007. "Product entry in a fast growing industry: The LAN switch market," Springer Books, in: Uwe Cantner & Franco Malerba (ed.), Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation, pages 87-106, Springer.
    2. Sarangi, Subrat & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Triantis, Konstantinos P., 2021. "Multimarket competition effects on product line decisions – A multi-objective decision model in fast moving consumer goods industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 388-398.
    3. Zhihong Chen & Zhiqi Chen, 2014. "Product Line Rivalry and Firm Asymmetry," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 417-435, September.
    4. Zhihong Chen & Zhiqi Chen, 2011. "Product Line Rivalry: A Further Analysis," Carleton Economic Papers 11-04, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    5. Fontana, Roberto & Vezzulli, Andrea, 2016. "Technological leadership and persistence in product innovation in the Local Area Network industry 1990–1999," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1604-1619.

Books

  1. Swati Bhatt, 2017. "How Digital Communication Technology Shapes Markets," Palgrave Advances in Economics of Innovation and Technology, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-319-47250-8, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Rauf Gönenç & Béatrice Guérard, 2017. "Austria’s digital transition: The diffusion challenge," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1430, OECD Publishing.
    2. Frolov, Daniil, 2019. "Блокчейн и институциональная сложность: постинституционализм vs. неоинституционализм," MPRA Paper 95963, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ulrich Schmitt, 2021. "Reframing a Novel Decentralized Knowledge Management Concept as a Desirable Vision: As We May Realize the Memex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-37, April.
    4. Frolov, Daniil, 2019. "Постинституциональная Теория Блокчейна: Трансакционная Ценность И Ассамбляжи [Post-Institutional Theory of Blockchain: Transaction Value and Assemblages]," MPRA Paper 95962, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ulrich Schmitt, 2021. "Projectability and Heritage Management of Design Knowledge: A Grass-Roots Artefact Perspective of a Longitudinal Research Project for Knowledge Management System Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Swati Bhatt should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.